Birdingonthe.Net

Recent Postings from
The Lepidoptera List

> Home > Mail
> Alerts

Updated on Tuesday, August 31 at 01:04 PM ET
The most recently received Mail is at the top.


Three-toed Woodpecker

31 Aug Eumorpha elisa, not "anchemolus" NEW US RECORD []
29 Aug Re: New Arizona Sphinx: Eumorpha anchemolus [Hugh McGuinness ]
29 Aug New Arizona Sphinx: Eumorpha anchemolus [Bruce Walsh ]
29 Aug New Arizona Sphinx: Eumorpha anchemolus [Bruce Walsh ]
19 Aug reference needed [Hugh McGuinness ]
16 Aug Re: Best variety of Zinnias to attract butterflies in Eastern US [Gary Sibio ]
15 Aug Re: Best variety of Zinnias to attract butterflies in Eastern US ["Dennis Schlicht" ]
15 Aug RE: Best variety of Zinnias to attract butterflies in Eastern US ["Michael Gochfeld" ]
15 Aug Best variety of Zinnias to attract butterflies in Eastern US [Roger Kuhlman ]
14 Aug A query on Antennae [Kishen Das ]
12 Aug The Xerces Society Receives Funding to Restore Monarch Butterfly Habitat [Matthew Shepherd ]
10 Aug ID help ["frontier News account" ]
10 Aug Re: Gynandromorph ETS []
5 Aug Re: MV shy species (Was: Nemoria splendidaria back in the US) ["jim taylor" ]
5 Aug MV shy species (Was: Nemoria splendidaria back in the US) [Peter Van Zandt ]
3 Aug RE: Help With three Larvae I.D.'s ["Wagner, David" ]
2 Aug Help With three Larvae I.D.'s [Vincent P Lucas ]
18 Jul Re: Nemoria splendidaria back in the US [Bruce Walsh ]
18 Jul Re: Nemoria splendidaria back in the US [Bruce Walsh ]
18 Jul Re: Nemoria splendidaria back in the US [Mike Quinn ]
16 Jul David Attenborough will be doing it - will you? [Neil Jones ]
15 Jul Three rare green gems [Bruce Walsh ]
15 Jul Three rare green gems [Bruce Walsh ]
16 Jul Re: help with larva ID []
15 Jul help with larva ID ["frontier News account" ]
15 Jul Re: Nemoria splendidaria back in the US [Bruce Walsh ]
15 Jul Re: Nemoria splendidaria back in the US [Bruce Walsh ]
15 Jul Re: Nemoria splendidaria back in the US [Vincent P Lucas ]
15 Jul Nemoria splendidaria back in the US [Bruce Walsh ]
15 Jul Nemoria splendidaria back in the US [Bruce Walsh ]
22 Jun Free scientific name spelling checker []
10 Jun Re: SCAM YALE EMAIL ALERT [Stan Gorodenski ]
10 Jun SCAM YALE EMAIL ALERT [Neil Jones ]
9 Jun Acronicta heitzmani ["Gary Anweiler" ]
9 Jun Re: Need Help with ID's ["Gary Anweiler" ]
9 Jun SET LEPS-L ["frontier News account" ]
9 Jun Re: Need Help with ID's [Hugh McGuinness ]
9 Jun Need Help with ID's ["frontier News account" ]
08 Jun Mercury Vapor lights [OscartheGrouch ]
8 Jun Low Rate for LEPSOC 2010 ends this Friday! ["David James" ]
7 Jun RE: Fulvia X Theona ["Hank Brodkin" ]
7 Jun RE: Fulvia X Theona ["Hank Brodkin" ]
7 Jun Re: Fulvia X Theona []
7 Jun Re: Fulvia X Theona []
7 Jun Fulvia X Theona ["Hank Brodkin" ]
7 Jun Fulvia X Theona ["Hank Brodkin" ]
7 Jun Agrostis I.D.? ["Jim Mason" ]
7 Jun desperately seeking Helicoverpa spp samples ["Holder, Peter" ]
2 Jun Book about Ecuadorian butterflies ["Checa,Maria V" ]
26 May Lepsoc 2010: Deadline for submitted papers is May 28 ["David James" ]
18 May RE: Mimic (Hypolimnas misippus) on Fort Hood, Coryell Co., Texas [Roger Kuhlman ]
18 May Re: Mimic (Hypolimnas misippus) on Fort Hood, Coryell Co., Texas [Mike Quinn ]
18 May RE: Mimic (Hypolimnas misippus) on Fort Hood, Coryell Co., Texas ["Grkovich, Alex" ]
18 May Re: Mimic (Hypolimnas misippus) on Fort Hood, Coryell Co., Texas [Richard Worth ]
17 May Fwd: Mimic (Hypolimnas misippus) on Fort Hood, Coryell Co., Texas [Mike Quinn ]
12 May Re: Red Admiral Invasion Year in Great Lakes States ["Bitzer, Royce J [ENT]" ]
12 May Re: Red Admiral Invasion Year in Great Lake States? [James McDermott ]
12 May Re: Red Admiral Invasion Year in Great Lake States? []
11 May RE: Red Admiral Invasion Year in Great Lake States? ["Jonathan Sylvestre" ]
11 May Re: Red Admiral Invasion Year in Great Lake States? [Sheri Moreau ]
11 May Re: Red Admiral Invasion Year in Great Lake States? [Gary Sibio ]
11 May Re: Red Admiral Invasion Year in Great Lake States? [Paul Cherubini ]
11 May Red Admiral Invasion Year in Great Lake States? [Roger Kuhlman ]
10 May LepSoc2010: Register Now! ["David James" ]
07 May DesertLeps [Stan Gorodenski ]
5 May Opler and Powell book images now available [Felix Sperling ]
04 May Powell and Opler book Images now available [Felix Sperling ]
4 May Re: Fwd: Palaeophobetron perornata - CenTex Apr 28, 2010 [Bruce Walsh ]
4 May Fwd: Palaeophobetron perornata - CenTex Apr 28, 2010 [Mike Quinn ]
3 May RE: Relaxing and setting hesperiidae specimens ["Grkovich, Alex" ]
3 May Re: Relaxing and setting hesperiidae specimens [Bruce Walsh ]
03 May Re: Relaxing and setting hesperiidae specimens [Andrew Torry ]
29 Apr Lepidoptera Course in June [Hugh McGuinness ]
28 Apr Arizona Lep course: Still openings! [Bruce Walsh ]
28 Apr Arizona Lep course: Still openings! [Bruce Walsh ]
27 Apr Printed copies of ZooKeys [Bruce Walsh ]

Subject: Eumorpha elisa, not "anchemolus" NEW US RECORD
From: jbwalsh AT email.arizona.edu
Date: Tue, 31 Aug 2010 10:47:10 -0700
Mistaken ID on the Eumorpha "anchemolus" record (August 26 MV lights, 
Foothills
Road, just North of Portal (on the plains just east of the Chirichahua Mts.,
Arizona). Just got an email for Ian Kitching (MNH, London). Its E. elisa, and
so a new US record


 
 ------------------------------------------------------------ 

   For subscription and related information about LEPS-L visit:

   http://www.peabody.yale.edu/other/lepsl 
 
Subject: Re: New Arizona Sphinx: Eumorpha anchemolus
From: Hugh McGuinness <hmcguinness AT ross.org>
Date: Sun, 29 Aug 2010 19:05:25 -0400
Hey Bruce,

That's great! How about posting a photo?

Congrats, Hugh

Hugh McGuinness
The Ross School
18 Goodfriend Drive
East Hampton, NY 11937
hmcguinness AT ross.org




On Aug 29, 2010, at 6:55 PM, Bruce Walsh wrote:

> Just took a Eumorpha anchemolus (IDed by Tuttle) -- second US record  
> and first
> from Arizona! Details: Friday night (August 26) MS lights, Foothills  
> Road, just
> North of Portal (on the plains just east of the Chirichahua Mts.),  
> Arizona
>
>
>
> ------------------------------------------------------------
>
>   For subscription and related information about LEPS-L visit:
>
>   http://www.peabody.yale.edu/other/lepsl
>
>


 
 ------------------------------------------------------------ 

   For subscription and related information about LEPS-L visit:

   http://www.peabody.yale.edu/other/lepsl 
 
Subject: New Arizona Sphinx: Eumorpha anchemolus
From: Bruce Walsh <jbwalsh AT u.arizona.edu>
Date: Sun, 29 Aug 2010 15:55:54 -0700
Just took a Eumorpha anchemolus (IDed by Tuttle) -- second US record and first
from Arizona! Details: Friday night (August 26) MS lights, Foothills Road, just
North of Portal (on the plains just east of the Chirichahua Mts.), Arizona


 
 ------------------------------------------------------------ 

   For subscription and related information about LEPS-L visit:

   http://www.peabody.yale.edu/other/lepsl 
 
Subject: New Arizona Sphinx: Eumorpha anchemolus
From: Bruce Walsh <jbwalsh AT u.arizona.edu>
Date: Sun, 29 Aug 2010 15:55:54 -0700
Just took a Eumorpha anchemolus (IDed by Tuttle) -- second US record and first
from Arizona! Details: Friday night (August 26) MS lights, Foothills Road, just
North of Portal (on the plains just east of the Chirichahua Mts.), Arizona
Subject: reference needed
From: Hugh McGuinness <hmcguinness AT ross.org>
Date: Thu, 19 Aug 2010 10:25:26 -0400
Hey Fellow Leppers,

Can anyone send me a pdf of the following article from the Canadian  
Entomologist (Bioone on line)?

Franclemont, J. G. 1946. A revision of the species of Symmerista  
Hübner known to occur north of the Mexican border (Lepidoptera,  
Notodontidae). Canadian Entomologist 78:96–103.


Hugh



Hugh McGuinness
The Ross School
18 Goodfriend Drive
East Hampton, NY 11937
hmcguinness AT ross.org






 
 ------------------------------------------------------------ 

   For subscription and related information about LEPS-L visit:

   http://www.peabody.yale.edu/other/lepsl 
 
Subject: Re: Best variety of Zinnias to attract butterflies in Eastern US
From: Gary Sibio <garysibio AT gmail.com>
Date: Mon, 16 Aug 2010 01:27:54 -0500
I don't know my zinnia varieties but someone I follow on Twitter and
Facebook posted this today. Maybe you cor someone else could recognize
the variety. It obviously attracts leps.

http://beverlyeverson.posterous.com/swallowtail-on-zinnia

On Sun, Aug 15, 2010 at 1:35 PM, Roger Kuhlman  wrote:
>
> I wonder what people feel is the best variety of Zinnias for attracting 
nectaring butterflies in the eastern United States. In recent years there seems 
to have been a proliferation of new Zinnia variants but many don't seem to 
interest butterflies. 

>
> Roger Kuhlman
> Ann Arbor, Michigan
> 8/15/2010
>
>
-- 
Gary J Sibio

If you would like to see my photos, click here:
http://www.flickr.com/photos/garysibio

 
 ------------------------------------------------------------ 

   For subscription and related information about LEPS-L visit:

   http://www.peabody.yale.edu/other/lepsl 
 
Subject: Re: Best variety of Zinnias to attract butterflies in Eastern US
From: "Dennis Schlicht" <dws1108 AT msn.com>
Date: Sun, 15 Aug 2010 22:17:46 -0500
Best variety of Zinnias to attract butterflies in Eastern USZinnia Cosmos is 
good. 

Dennis Schlicht
  ----- Original Message ----- 
  From: Michael Gochfeld 
 To: rkuhlman AT hotmail.com ; Leps 
List 

  Sent: Sunday, August 15, 2010 2:35 PM
  Subject: RE: Best variety of Zinnias to attract butterflies in Eastern US


 I think that a lot of the horticultural varieties of Zinnia are doubles, with 
the reproductive organs replaced by petal-like structures to make them more 
showy (but at the same time less nectifarous). The ones that look daisy-like 
with disc flowers seem to be more attactive. 


 Michael Gochfeld gochfeld AT eohsi.rutgers.edu 

   


------------------------------------------------------------------------------
 From: owner-leps-l AT lists.yale.edu on 
behalf of Roger Kuhlman 

  Sent: Sun 8/15/2010 2:35 PM
  To: Leps List
  Subject: Best variety of Zinnias to attract butterflies in Eastern US




 I wonder what people feel is the best variety of Zinnias for attracting 
nectaring butterflies in the eastern United States. In recent years there seems 
to have been a proliferation of new Zinnia variants but many don't seem to 
interest butterflies. 


  Roger Kuhlman
  Ann Arbor, Michigan
  8/15/2010                                        


   ------------------------------------------------------------

     For subscription and related information about LEPS-L visit:

 
http://www.peabody.yale.edu/other/lepsl 



Subject: RE: Best variety of Zinnias to attract butterflies in Eastern US
From: "Michael Gochfeld" <gochfeld AT EOHSI.RUTGERS.EDU>
Date: Sun, 15 Aug 2010 15:35:50 -0400
I think that a lot of the horticultural varieties of Zinnia are doubles, with 
the reproductive organs replaced by petal-like structures to make them more 
showy (but at the same time less nectifarous). The ones that look daisy-like 
with disc flowers seem to be more attactive. 

 
Michael Gochfeld gochfeld AT eohsi.rutgers.edu
 

________________________________

From: owner-leps-l AT lists.yale.edu on behalf of Roger Kuhlman
Sent: Sun 8/15/2010 2:35 PM
To: Leps List
Subject: Best variety of Zinnias to attract butterflies in Eastern US




I wonder what people feel is the best variety of Zinnias for attracting 
nectaring butterflies in the eastern United States. In recent years there seems 
to have been a proliferation of new Zinnia variants but many don't seem to 
interest butterflies. 


Roger Kuhlman
Ann Arbor, Michigan
8/15/2010                                        


 ------------------------------------------------------------

   For subscription and related information about LEPS-L visit:

   http://www.peabody.yale.edu/other/lepsl



Subject: Best variety of Zinnias to attract butterflies in Eastern US
From: Roger Kuhlman <rkuhlman AT hotmail.com>
Date: Sun, 15 Aug 2010 14:35:00 -0400
I wonder what people feel is the best variety of Zinnias for attracting 
nectaring butterflies in the eastern United States. In recent years there seems 
to have been a proliferation of new Zinnia variants but many don't seem to 
interest butterflies. 

 
Roger Kuhlman
Ann Arbor, Michigan
8/15/2010 		 	   		  

 
 ------------------------------------------------------------ 

   For subscription and related information about LEPS-L visit:

   http://www.peabody.yale.edu/other/lepsl 
 
Subject: A query on Antennae
From: Kishen Das <malabartreenymph AT gmail.com>
Date: Sat, 14 Aug 2010 12:31:42 -0500
Dear Lepidopterists,

I have a basic question.
Is the pattern( coloration and structure) of Antennae unique for a butterfly
species or can have variations within the species?
I will be interested in papers that talk on these lines.

Thanks and Regards,
Kishen Das
Subject: The Xerces Society Receives Funding to Restore Monarch Butterfly Habitat
From: Matthew Shepherd <mdshepherd AT xerces.org>
Date: Thu, 12 Aug 2010 16:22:28 -0700
Having trouble viewing this email? Click

here 


[image: 
milkweed] 


*The Xerces Society Receives USDA Funding to Restore Monarch Butterfly
Habitat*



*
Project will increase the availability of less common milkweeds to benefit
monarch butterflies and other pollinators***



*August 12, 2010

Contact: Eric Mader, Assistant Director Pollinator Conservation Program:*

*503-232-6639*



PORTLAND, Ore. - The nonprofit Xerces Society for Invertebrate Conservation
received funding today from the USDA's Natural Resources Conservation
Service (NRCS) for a project that will improve habitat for monarch
butterflies. The project, supported by the NRCS Conservation Innovation
Grant Program, will work with native plant nurseries to increase the
abundance of milkweed plants (*Ascelpias* spp.), the food source for monarch
caterpillars.

This work is a outgrowth of the *North American Monarch Conservation Plan*,
published in 2008 by the Commission for Environmental Cooperation, a treaty
organization between the United States, Canada, and Mexico established by
the North American Free Trade Agreement. The *Plan *summarizes the decline
of monarchs across their native range and details a plan for their
conservation. Specifically the *Plan* calls for groups to determine if,
when, and where milkweed is a limiting resource and to develop plans to
plant regionally appropriate species and guidelines for farm buffers for
nectar sources.

While several species of milkweed are common in parts of the United States,
not all are widely used by monarchs. In many cases, where there is a
scarcity of preferred milkweed species in the wild, there is also a lack of
commercially available seed. This is a limiting factor in habitat
restoration efforts for this iconic butterfly. This scarcity of caterpillar
food sources is of special concern in states like California, Texas,
Arizona, and Florida, where monarchs first arrive from overwintering sites
in Mexico and the California coast. Without suitable host plants for egg
laying in these regions, fewer second-generation butterflies are produced to
continue the northward journey and complete the species' annual migration.
Once a common feature of prairies and riparian areas, milkweeds are
increasingly rare. Intensified agriculture, the development of rural lands,
and the use of mowing and herbicides to control roadside vegetation have all
contributed to the decline of these plants.

In response to the decline of monarchs and the critical need for milkweed in
these regions, the NRCS has provided $117,000 to increase the seed
availability of key milkweed species. To conduct the project, the Xerces
Society is partnering with the Monarch Joint Venture (MJV), a coalition of
federal and state agencies, scientists, and nonprofit conservation
organizations.

Over the course of the next three years, the Xerces Society will work with
the NRCS and native seed producers to develop reliable sources of
regionally-appropriate native milkweed. The project will also develop
printed guidelines and an online directory that provides complete
information on using milkweed in habitat restoration projects, and
incorporate information on native milkweeds into educational training Xerces
conducts each year for land managers and conservation professionals.

"Milkweeds benefit a wide array of pollinators and provide another tool for
conserving farmland habitat," said Eric Mader, Assistant Director of the
Xerces Society's Pollinator Conservation Program. "This project will ensure
that monarchs have the critical habitat that they need to sustain healthy
populations."

For more information, please visit

http://www.xerces.org/california-monarchs/ 




*ABOUT THE XERCES SOCIETY*

The Xerces Society is a nonprofit organization that protects wildlife
through the conservation of invertebrates and their habitat. Established in
1971, the Society is at the forefront of invertebrate protection worldwide,
harnessing the knowledge of scientists and the enthusiasm of citizens to
implement conservation programs. To learn more about our work or to donate
to the Society, please visit

www.xerces.org 

.



*ABOUT THE MONARCH JOINT VENTURE*

The Monarch Joint

Venture(MJV) 

is a partnership of federal and state agencies, nongovernmental
organizations, and academic programs that are working together in a
coordinated effort to protect the monarch migration. MJV partners are
committed to a science-based approach to monarch conservation work, guided
by the North American Monarch Conservation

Plan 

.



*PHOTO CREDIT*

Milkweed (*Asclepias* spp.) © R.A. Howard  AT  USDA-NRCS PLANTS Database

The Xerces Society • 4828 SE Hawthorne Blvd. Portland, Oregon 97215 USA •
tel 503.232.6639
info AT xerces.org •

www.xerces.org 


Copyright © 2010 The Xerces Society. All rights reserved.
Subject: ID help
From: "frontier News account" <trgarden AT frontiernet.net>
Date: Tue, 10 Aug 2010 15:24:57 -0500
Hi all

This moth is a Virbia but I am not sure what species.  My guess is 
immaculata.  Was wondering what others thought it was?  Found it in the 
grass along a Railroad Track during the day

Data:
Nobles County, MN.
Worthington
August 3, 2010

Wingspan 20mm

Here is a link to the Pic.

 http://frontiernet.net/~trgarden/TomMidda/DSCN3841a.jpg

Thanks
Tom Middagh 


 
 ------------------------------------------------------------ 

   For subscription and related information about LEPS-L visit:

   http://www.peabody.yale.edu/other/lepsl 
 

Subject: Re: Gynandromorph ETS
From: jadams AT daltonstate.edu
Date: Tue, 10 Aug 2010 01:13:25 +0000 (GMT)
Neil and others,

 Please pass this image along to other list serves where people might be 
interested. I collected a similar gynandromorph a few years back. Here's the 
link, not only to my image as well as a page on gynandromorphs and how it works 
on my Georgia Lepidoptera website. Thanks for sharing the image!! Beautiful 
with the other Tigers as well. 


James

Here's the link:  http://www.daltonstate.edu/galeps/Gynandromorphs.htm

James K. Adams 
Professor of Biology, Dalton State College 
706-272-4427; 678-767-5938 
Check out Georgia Lepidoptera at: 
  http://www.daltonstate.edu/galeps 
Subject: Re: MV shy species (Was: Nemoria splendidaria back in the US)
From: "jim taylor" <drivingiron AT bellsouth.net>
Date: Thu, 5 Aug 2010 16:00:02 -0400
Peter:

I run my black light about a foot from the sheet. I also have a monster sodium 
vapor, which I hang a couple of feet in front of the sheet when I use it. 
Should be interesting to see how others are doing. 


Jim Taylor


From: Peter Van Zandt 
Sent: Thursday, August 05, 2010 2:45 PM
To: leps-l AT lists.yale.edu 
Subject: MV shy species (Was: Nemoria splendidaria back in the US)


These are great suggestions, especially for a newbie like me. I'm curious if 
one would get the same benefit from either: 

1) running a black light on another sheet some distance (10 feet?) away, or
2) using a black light on the opposite side of the sheet from the MV light.
Thanks for any feedback,

Pete Van Zandt
Birmingham-Southern College
Birmingham, AL

> Date: Sun, 18 Jul 2010 22:36:01 -0700
> From: jbwalsh AT u.arizona.edu
> To: entomike AT gmail.com
> CC: LEPS-L AT lists.yale.edu; TILS-moth-rah AT yahoogroups.com; 
SoWestLep AT yahoogroups.com; john.palting AT ventana.roche.com; 
rnagle AT email.arizona.edu 

> Subject: Re: Nemoria splendidaria back in the US
> 
> Quoting Mike Quinn :
> 
> > Bruce,
> >
> > You might wanna try an ol' beetle collectors trick (taught to me by Ed
> > Riley).
> >
> > After a while, turn off your mercury vapor light and run a 2 foot black
> > light bulb. The merc often overpowers the bugs, so to speak, keeping them 
at 

> > a distance. The small blacklight allows the bugs to reach your sheet...
> >
> 
> 
> Mike:
> 
> Excellent suggestion, as this is exactly what I do. Basically, the amount of
> stuff on the sheet doubles right after!
> 
> 
> 
> ------------------------------------------------------------ 
> 
> For subscription and related information about LEPS-L visit:
> 
> http://www.peabody.yale.edu/other/lepsl 
> 
> 
Subject: MV shy species (Was: Nemoria splendidaria back in the US)
From: Peter Van Zandt <pvz19 AT hotmail.com>
Date: Thu, 5 Aug 2010 18:45:01 +0000
These are great suggestions, especially for a newbie like me. I'm curious if 
one would get the same benefit from either: 

1) running a black light on another sheet some distance (10 feet?) away, or
2) using a black light on the opposite side of the sheet from the MV light.
Thanks for any feedback,

Pete Van Zandt
Birmingham-Southern College
Birmingham, AL

> Date: Sun, 18 Jul 2010 22:36:01 -0700
> From: jbwalsh AT u.arizona.edu
> To: entomike AT gmail.com
> CC: LEPS-L AT lists.yale.edu; TILS-moth-rah AT yahoogroups.com; 
SoWestLep AT yahoogroups.com; john.palting AT ventana.roche.com; 
rnagle AT email.arizona.edu 

> Subject: Re: Nemoria splendidaria back in the US
> 
> Quoting Mike Quinn :
> 
> > Bruce,
> >
> > You might wanna try an ol' beetle collectors trick (taught to me by Ed
> > Riley).
> >
> > After a while, turn off your mercury vapor light and run a 2 foot black
> > light bulb. The merc often overpowers the bugs, so to speak, keeping them 
at 

> > a distance. The small blacklight allows the bugs to reach your sheet...
> >
> 
> 
> Mike:
> 
> Excellent suggestion, as this is exactly what I do.  Basically, the amount of
> stuff on the sheet doubles right after!
> 
> 
>  
>  ------------------------------------------------------------ 
> 
>    For subscription and related information about LEPS-L visit:
> 
>    http://www.peabody.yale.edu/other/lepsl 
>  
> 
 		 	   		  
Subject: RE: Help With three Larvae I.D.'s
From: "Wagner, David" <david.wagner AT uconn.edu>
Date: Tue, 3 Aug 2010 15:49:41 -0400
Vincent,

I am the final throes of authoring a guide to owlet (noctuid) caterpillars. I 
would love to include a putative image of Cydosia nobilitella in the work. Is 
there anyway you could help me track down a more pixel-rich image and help 
obtain permission to reproduce the image in my guide?-with full credit of 
course. 


What a splendid animal and what a great capstone for the book which is due at 
Princeton in October. 


Cheers and thanks.

David L. Wagner
Professor, Ecology and Evolutionary Biology
Storrs, CT 06269-3043
v. (860) 486-2139; f. (860) 486-6364


PS I think the arctiid might be Hyphantria cunea.  Not sure.



________________________________
From: owner-leps-l AT lists.yale.edu [mailto:owner-leps-l AT lists.yale.edu] On 
Behalf Of Vincent P Lucas 

Sent: Monday, August 02, 2010 6:12 PM
To: Leps-l
Subject: Help With three Larvae I.D.'s

A photographer friend of mine photographed these three larvae in Miami-Dade 
County, Florida. In two of them, he identifies the plant that they are on but 
not for the third. Can anyone offer some insight into what they might be? The 
only larvae that I can find that utilize Spigelia anthelmia (West Indian 
Pinkroot aka Wormweed) as a foodplant host is a member of the Noctuidae i.e. 
Cydosia nobilitella (MONA 9000) formerly Cydosia submutata. My friend did 
photograph an adult of this species not less than 100 yards away from where he 
photographed the larva on West Indian Pinkroot. . . . J.B. Heppner in 
_Arthropods of Florida And Neighboring Land Areas: LEPIDOPTERA OF FLORIDA, Part 
1 Introduction And Catalog_ (2003), states that the hostplant is unknown for 
this species. . . . However, Tietz in _An Index To The Described Life 
Histories, Early Stages And Hosts Of The Macrolepidoptera Of The Continental 
United States And Canada_ (1972) lists Cydosia nobilitella (now) as the lep 
that utilizes West Indian Pinkroot as the larval hostplant. The photo of the 
yellow "dangling" caterpillar looks like a geometrid of some type to me, but 
I'm not sure. The last photo of the larva on cypress could possibly be an 
Arctiid, but again, I don't know. Have a look at these three photos and if you 
can shed any light on them as to the identities of these larvae, feel free to 
chime in with your response. Thanks. 


Vincent Lucas
Naples, FL
vplucas AT comcast.net

http://www.flickr.com/photos/rpilla001/4809620864/

http://www.flickr.com/photos/rpilla001/3911968333/

http://www.flickr.com/photos/rpilla001/2892597823/
Subject: Help With three Larvae I.D.'s
From: Vincent P Lucas <vplucas AT comcast.net>
Date: Mon, 2 Aug 2010 18:11:38 -0400
A photographer friend of mine photographed these three larvae in Miami- 
Dade County, Florida. In two of them, he identifies the plant that  
they are on but not for the third. Can anyone offer some insight into  
what they might be? The only larvae that I can find that utilize  
Spigelia anthelmia (West Indian Pinkroot aka Wormweed) as a foodplant  
host is a member of the Noctuidae i.e. Cydosia nobilitella (MONA 9000)  
formerly Cydosia submutata. My friend did photograph an adult of this  
species not less than 100 yards away from where he photographed the  
larva on West Indian Pinkroot. . . . J.B. Heppner in _Arthropods of  
Florida And Neighboring Land Areas: LEPIDOPTERA OF FLORIDA, Part 1  
Introduction And Catalog_ (2003), states that the hostplant is unknown  
for this species. . . . However, Tietz in _An Index To The Described  
Life Histories, Early Stages And Hosts Of The Macrolepidoptera Of The  
Continental United States And Canada_ (1972) lists Cydosia nobilitella  
(now) as the lep that utilizes West Indian Pinkroot as the larval  
hostplant. The photo of the yellow "dangling" caterpillar looks like a  
geometrid of some type to me, but I'm not sure. The last photo of the  
larva on cypress could possibly be an Arctiid, but again, I don't  
know. Have a look at these three photos and if you can shed any light  
on them as to the identities of these larvae, feel free to chime in  
with your response. Thanks.

Vincent Lucas
Naples, FL
vplucas AT comcast.net

http://www.flickr.com/photos/rpilla001/4809620864/

http://www.flickr.com/photos/rpilla001/3911968333/

http://www.flickr.com/photos/rpilla001/2892597823/
Subject: Re: Nemoria splendidaria back in the US
From: Bruce Walsh <jbwalsh AT u.arizona.edu>
Date: Sun, 18 Jul 2010 22:36:01 -0700
Quoting Mike Quinn :

> Bruce,
>
> You might wanna try an ol' beetle collectors trick (taught to me by Ed
> Riley).
>
> After a while, turn off your mercury vapor light and run a 2 foot black
> light bulb. The merc often overpowers the bugs, so to speak, keeping them at
> a distance. The small blacklight allows the bugs to reach your sheet...
>


Mike:

Excellent suggestion, as this is exactly what I do.  Basically, the amount of
stuff on the sheet doubles right after!


 
 ------------------------------------------------------------ 

   For subscription and related information about LEPS-L visit:

   http://www.peabody.yale.edu/other/lepsl 
 
Subject: Re: Nemoria splendidaria back in the US
From: Bruce Walsh <jbwalsh AT u.arizona.edu>
Date: Sun, 18 Jul 2010 22:36:01 -0700
Quoting Mike Quinn :

> Bruce,
>
> You might wanna try an ol' beetle collectors trick (taught to me by Ed
> Riley).
>
> After a while, turn off your mercury vapor light and run a 2 foot black
> light bulb. The merc often overpowers the bugs, so to speak, keeping them at
> a distance. The small blacklight allows the bugs to reach your sheet...
>


Mike:

Excellent suggestion, as this is exactly what I do.  Basically, the amount of
stuff on the sheet doubles right after!
Subject: Re: Nemoria splendidaria back in the US
From: Mike Quinn <entomike AT gmail.com>
Date: Sun, 18 Jul 2010 23:51:31 -0500
Bruce,

You might wanna try an ol' beetle collectors trick (taught to me by Ed
Riley).

After a while, turn off your mercury vapor light and run a 2 foot black
light bulb. The merc often overpowers the bugs, so to speak, keeping them at
a distance. The small blacklight allows the bugs to reach your sheet...

Mike Quinn, Austin
________________
Texas Entomology
http://texasento.net


On Thu, Jul 15, 2010 at 1:33 PM, Bruce Walsh  wrote:

> The striking green geo Nemoria splendidaria (MONA 7038), figured at
>
> 
http://nitro.biosci.arizona.edu/zeeb/butterflies/figs/moths/Geometridae/Geometrinae/7038.jpg 

> is a bug of legend for us moth-ers here in SE Arizona.  In Ferguson's
> (1985)
> MONA on the green geos, he lists two US records, both from the Huachuca Mts
> in
> SE Arizona):  The holotype from Palmerlee (described in 1910) and a record
> from
> Sunnyside Canyon in 1958.
>
> As all great lep tales go, this one happened by accident.  Tucson
> collectors
> John Palting and Ray Nagle were planning on heading up to Mt Graham last
> Saturday for some lighting, a three hour drive.  Running late, they decided
> to
> collect up on Carr Canyon in the Huachucas.  At around 3:30 am, a very
> fresh
> pslendidaria came to the light, but settled away from the sheet, on the
> ground.
>  John ended up taking three more around (but never on) his sheet, and one
> in his
> trap.  An outstanding record!
>
> Last night, I ventured back to the same location (round 7400 feet).  Around
> 1:30, a splendiadaria settled on the ground about 3 feet away from my
> lights,
> also very fresh.  It was eventually joined by three others (the last being
> detected around 4:30 am), again, all away from the lights.  My two light
> traps
> yielded three more, for a total of seven.  Again, as with John's all were
> very
> fresh.
>
> I suspect that this is not a case of splendidaria becoming reestablished,
> but
> rather a local bug that does not come directly to light that flies (high
> elevation, start of the monsoon) at locations not generally collected.
>
> cheers
>
> bruce
>
Subject: David Attenborough will be doing it - will you?
From: Neil Jones <neil AT nwjones.demon.co.uk>
Date: Fri, 16 Jul 2010 17:51:15 +0100
 
------------------------------------------------------------------------

*From:* Louise Keeling
*Sent:* 09 July 2010 16:34
*To:* All Staff
*Subject:* David Attenborough will be doing it - will you?

 

Butterflies are both beautiful and vital to the health of our environment.

 

Their survival is crucial yet they are in serious decline.

 

*Be part of the big butterfly count from the 24^th July to the 1^st of 
August this year and help us gather information to save them. *

 

Just find a place where you might see butterflies, such as a garden or 
park, and count the different butterflies you see in just 15 minutes. 
You can make counts in several places during the week.

 

Submit your sightings at www.bigbutterflycount.org 
  and you'll receive 10 per cent 
off plants when you shop online at M&S.  * 

 

Butterflies are disappearing fast and we can't help them without your 
support.

 

See the website for details.

 

**Please forward this email to your friends of relatives** - the more 
people who join in, the more accurate a picture we can build of our 
changing butterflies.

 

Thank you

 

*Terms and conditions apply.  See www.marksandspencer.com/offers 
 for details.   

 

 

*Lou Keeling*
*Senior Publicity Officer*
lkeeling AT butterfly-conservation.org

* *

*Join the **big butterfly count** and help us take the pulse of nature ***

*24 July -- 1 August at** **www.bigbutterflycount.org 
*

BBC-logo-copy2.jpg

 

 BC-master_new-strapline-lo2.jpg          IYB2010_Logo_English_sm2.jpg

 

Butterfly Conservation
Manor Yard
East Lulworth
Wareham
Dorset BH20 5QP
Tel Direct: 01929 406005. Tel Reception: 01929 400209 Fax: 01929 400210
Company limited by guarantee, registered in England (2206468). Charity 
registered in England & Wales (254937) and in Scotland (SCO39268)

*************************************************************************
Butterfly Conservation is dedicated to saving butterflies, moths and the 
environment. If you would like further information please view our 
website at_ __<>_

**Over 40 years of saving butterflies, moths and their habitats.**

*************************************************************************
The views and comments expressed in this email do not necessarily 
express the views of Butterfly Conservation.
If you do not wish to receive any further information about the 
conservation, campaigning and fundraising work of the Society please 
reply to this email with the word 'unsubscribe' in the subject line.

************************************************************************

 

No virus found in this incoming message.
Checked by AVG - www.avg.com 
Version: 8.5.441 / Virus Database: 271.1.1/3008 - Release Date: 07/15/10 
18:35:00 

Subject: Three rare green gems
From: Bruce Walsh <jbwalsh AT u.arizona.edu>
Date: Thu, 15 Jul 2010 21:24:15 -0700
One of the fun things (among a large number to choose from!) about collecting 
in 

SE Arizona is a rather large number of species known from just a few
individuals.  Are these rare strays from strange (and uncollected) locations in
nearby Mexico?  Are they locally common at the right time and location, which
(for some reason) collectors seem to avoid?

In 1985 when Ferguson published his MONA on the green Geos, three AZ species
were all known from four individuals (or less).

A recent post dealt with Nemoria splendidaria [ MONA 7038 ]

A second species, Nemoria mutaticolor [ MONA 7017 ], is known from just three
individuals (as of 1985), the type from Mexico and two individuals from Madera
Canyon.  Given that Madera is a classic location, perhaps these are rare strays
from the top of the Santa Ritas (which rise to over 9500 feet) around the 5500
feet of Madera.  Keep looking, but have never taken this.  No online photo, see
the MONA.  One reason is that it very closely resembles the more common
Nemoria strigataria [ MONA 7039 ]

http://nitro.biosci.arizona.edu/zeeb/butterflies/figs/moths/Geometridae/Geometrinae/7039.jpg 


The third little green gem is Lophochorista lesteraria [ MONA 7069 ],

http://nitro.biosci.arizona.edu/zeeb/butterflies/figs/moths/Geometridae/Geometrinae/L_brynei.jpg 

Pretty obvious, only green geo with large white spots.  Ferguson lists four
records from the Santa Catalinas (which I collect all the time) and Brown
Canyon in the Baboquivari Mts.  I also collect here regularly, but no luck!  In
2006, out-of-towner Tomas Mustelin took one in Brown when he was trapping with
me, and there are two records from the 1990's from Pena Blanca.

So, if you find yourself collecting in SE Arizona, keep an eye out for these, 
as 

 you never know when/where they might turn up!

cheers

bruce





 
 ------------------------------------------------------------ 

   For subscription and related information about LEPS-L visit:

   http://www.peabody.yale.edu/other/lepsl 
 
Subject: Three rare green gems
From: Bruce Walsh <jbwalsh AT u.arizona.edu>
Date: Thu, 15 Jul 2010 21:24:15 -0700
One of the fun things (among a large number to choose from!) about collecting 
in 

SE Arizona is a rather large number of species known from just a few
individuals.  Are these rare strays from strange (and uncollected) locations in
nearby Mexico?  Are they locally common at the right time and location, which
(for some reason) collectors seem to avoid?

In 1985 when Ferguson published his MONA on the green Geos, three AZ species
were all known from four individuals (or less).

A recent post dealt with Nemoria splendidaria [ MONA 7038 ]

A second species, Nemoria mutaticolor [ MONA 7017 ], is known from just three
individuals (as of 1985), the type from Mexico and two individuals from Madera
Canyon.  Given that Madera is a classic location, perhaps these are rare strays
from the top of the Santa Ritas (which rise to over 9500 feet) around the 5500
feet of Madera.  Keep looking, but have never taken this.  No online photo, see
the MONA.  One reason is that it very closely resembles the more common
Nemoria strigataria [ MONA 7039 ]

http://nitro.biosci.arizona.edu/zeeb/butterflies/figs/moths/Geometridae/Geometrinae/7039.jpg 


The third little green gem is Lophochorista lesteraria [ MONA 7069 ],

http://nitro.biosci.arizona.edu/zeeb/butterflies/figs/moths/Geometridae/Geometrinae/L_brynei.jpg 

Pretty obvious, only green geo with large white spots.  Ferguson lists four
records from the Santa Catalinas (which I collect all the time) and Brown
Canyon in the Baboquivari Mts.  I also collect here regularly, but no luck!  In
2006, out-of-towner Tomas Mustelin took one in Brown when he was trapping with
me, and there are two records from the 1990's from Pena Blanca.

So, if you find yourself collecting in SE Arizona, keep an eye out for these, 
as 

 you never know when/where they might turn up!

cheers

bruce



Subject: Re: help with larva ID
From: jadams AT daltonstate.edu
Date: Fri, 16 Jul 2010 03:27:09 +0000 (GMT)
Tom,

             This is Harrismemna trisignata.  Hope this helps!

James

 
 ------------------------------------------------------------ 

   For subscription and related information about LEPS-L visit:

   http://www.peabody.yale.edu/other/lepsl 
 
Subject: help with larva ID
From: "frontier News account" <trgarden AT frontiernet.net>
Date: Thu, 15 Jul 2010 21:10:59 -0500
Hi

Received this fuzzy pic of a larva.  Was wondering if anybody had an idea 
what it is.

found in Minnesota
about 3" long
Appears to have some hair with some odd bits on the ends projecting from the 
head.
Some hair patches on the sides
Not sure what the shubbery it is feeding on.

Sorry for the odd description and the fuzzy picture.  The young gal that 
sent it to me only was able to get this pic.

Looks quite interesting.

Link to pic::

http://frontiernet.net/~trgarden/TomMidda/larva.jpg


Thanks
Tom Middagh 


 
 ------------------------------------------------------------ 

   For subscription and related information about LEPS-L visit:

   http://www.peabody.yale.edu/other/lepsl 
 

Subject: Re: Nemoria splendidaria back in the US
From: Bruce Walsh <jbwalsh AT u.arizona.edu>
Date: Thu, 15 Jul 2010 13:12:18 -0700
Quoting Vincent P Lucas :

> So, by my calculations, that's a total of 12 or so specimens taken in
> all. Just how big do you think this "local" population is and if it's
> that rare, perhaps prudence should be the operative word with
> regarding to collecting it? Just my 2-cents' worth. . . .
>
> Vincent Lucas
> Naples, FL
>
>

Vincent:

Excellent question.  Given that all 12 were very fresh males, and 
collected in a
roughly 10 foot circle in the middle of thousands of acres of identical 
habitat,
its pretty clear the bug is in good shape.  For example, until recently,
"Biston" multidentata (Guedet 1941) [ MONA 6641 ] was known from 
roughly a dozen
total specimens, all but 2 females.  However, this year in the right 
habitat we
routinely saw 30-50 males, all of which flew just before sunset or just before
sunrise.  Again, much more common than thought, just that the normal sampling
methods, locations, and time only catch those few individuals that strayed
widely from their core habitat.

We are blessed here in SE Arizona with huge areas of habitat for almost 
all our
bugs.  If this was a small isolated hammock in S FLorida, we would have 
treated
it very differently!


 
 ------------------------------------------------------------ 

   For subscription and related information about LEPS-L visit:

   http://www.peabody.yale.edu/other/lepsl 
 
Subject: Re: Nemoria splendidaria back in the US
From: Bruce Walsh <jbwalsh AT u.arizona.edu>
Date: Thu, 15 Jul 2010 13:12:18 -0700
Quoting Vincent P Lucas :

> So, by my calculations, that's a total of 12 or so specimens taken in
> all. Just how big do you think this "local" population is and if it's
> that rare, perhaps prudence should be the operative word with
> regarding to collecting it? Just my 2-cents' worth. . . .
>
> Vincent Lucas
> Naples, FL
>
>

Vincent:

Excellent question.  Given that all 12 were very fresh males, and 
collected in a
roughly 10 foot circle in the middle of thousands of acres of identical 
habitat,
its pretty clear the bug is in good shape.  For example, until recently,
"Biston" multidentata (Guedet 1941) [ MONA 6641 ] was known from 
roughly a dozen
total specimens, all but 2 females.  However, this year in the right 
habitat we
routinely saw 30-50 males, all of which flew just before sunset or just before
sunrise.  Again, much more common than thought, just that the normal sampling
methods, locations, and time only catch those few individuals that strayed
widely from their core habitat.

We are blessed here in SE Arizona with huge areas of habitat for almost 
all our
bugs.  If this was a small isolated hammock in S FLorida, we would have 
treated
it very differently!
Subject: Re: Nemoria splendidaria back in the US
From: Vincent P Lucas <vplucas AT comcast.net>
Date: Thu, 15 Jul 2010 15:17:23 -0400
So, by my calculations, that's a total of 12 or so specimens taken in  
all. Just how big do you think this "local" population is and if it's  
that rare, perhaps prudence should be the operative word with  
regarding to collecting it? Just my 2-cents' worth. . . .

Vincent Lucas
Naples, FL

On Jul 15, 2010, at 2:33 PM, Bruce Walsh wrote:

> The striking green geo Nemoria splendidaria (MONA 7038), figured at
> 
http://nitro.biosci.arizona.edu/zeeb/butterflies/figs/moths/Geometridae/Geometrinae/7038.jpg 

> is a bug of legend for us moth-ers here in SE Arizona.  In  
> Ferguson's (1985)
> MONA on the green geos, he lists two US records, both from the  
> Huachuca Mts in
> SE Arizona):  The holotype from Palmerlee (described in 1910) and a  
> record from
> Sunnyside Canyon in 1958.
>
> As all great lep tales go, this one happened by accident.  Tucson  
> collectors
> John Palting and Ray Nagle were planning on heading up to Mt Graham  
> last
> Saturday for some lighting, a three hour drive.  Running late, they  
> decided to
> collect up on Carr Canyon in the Huachucas.  At around 3:30 am, a  
> very fresh
> pslendidaria came to the light, but settled away from the sheet, on  
> the ground.
> John ended up taking three more around (but never on) his sheet, and  
> one in his
> trap.  An outstanding record!
>
> Last night, I ventured back to the same location (round 7400 feet).   
> Around
> 1:30, a splendiadaria settled on the ground about 3 feet away from  
> my lights,
> also very fresh.  It was eventually joined by three others (the last  
> being
> detected around 4:30 am), again, all away from the lights.  My two  
> light traps
> yielded three more, for a total of seven.  Again, as with John's all  
> were very
> fresh.
>
> I suspect that this is not a case of splendidaria becoming  
> reestablished, but
> rather a local bug that does not come directly to light that flies  
> (high
> elevation, start of the monsoon) at locations not generally collected.
>
> cheers
>
> bruce
>
>
>
> ------------------------------------------------------------
>
>   For subscription and related information about LEPS-L visit:
>
>   http://www.peabody.yale.edu/other/lepsl
>
>


 
 ------------------------------------------------------------ 

   For subscription and related information about LEPS-L visit:

   http://www.peabody.yale.edu/other/lepsl 
 
Subject: Nemoria splendidaria back in the US
From: Bruce Walsh <jbwalsh AT u.arizona.edu>
Date: Thu, 15 Jul 2010 11:33:26 -0700
The striking green geo Nemoria splendidaria (MONA 7038), figured at

http://nitro.biosci.arizona.edu/zeeb/butterflies/figs/moths/Geometridae/Geometrinae/7038.jpg 

is a bug of legend for us moth-ers here in SE Arizona.  In Ferguson's (1985)
MONA on the green geos, he lists two US records, both from the Huachuca Mts in
SE Arizona):  The holotype from Palmerlee (described in 1910) and a record from
Sunnyside Canyon in 1958.

As all great lep tales go, this one happened by accident.  Tucson collectors
John Palting and Ray Nagle were planning on heading up to Mt Graham last
Saturday for some lighting, a three hour drive.  Running late, they decided to
collect up on Carr Canyon in the Huachucas.  At around 3:30 am, a very fresh
pslendidaria came to the light, but settled away from the sheet, on the ground.
 John ended up taking three more around (but never on) his sheet, and one in 
his 

trap.  An outstanding record!

Last night, I ventured back to the same location (round 7400 feet).  Around
1:30, a splendiadaria settled on the ground about 3 feet away from my lights,
also very fresh.  It was eventually joined by three others (the last being
detected around 4:30 am), again, all away from the lights.  My two light traps
yielded three more, for a total of seven.  Again, as with John's all were very
fresh.

I suspect that this is not a case of splendidaria becoming reestablished, but
rather a local bug that does not come directly to light that flies (high
elevation, start of the monsoon) at locations not generally collected.

cheers

bruce


 
 ------------------------------------------------------------ 

   For subscription and related information about LEPS-L visit:

   http://www.peabody.yale.edu/other/lepsl 
 
Subject: Nemoria splendidaria back in the US
From: Bruce Walsh <jbwalsh AT u.arizona.edu>
Date: Thu, 15 Jul 2010 11:33:26 -0700
The striking green geo Nemoria splendidaria (MONA 7038), figured at

http://nitro.biosci.arizona.edu/zeeb/butterflies/figs/moths/Geometridae/Geometrinae/7038.jpg 

is a bug of legend for us moth-ers here in SE Arizona.  In Ferguson's (1985)
MONA on the green geos, he lists two US records, both from the Huachuca Mts in
SE Arizona):  The holotype from Palmerlee (described in 1910) and a record from
Sunnyside Canyon in 1958.

As all great lep tales go, this one happened by accident.  Tucson collectors
John Palting and Ray Nagle were planning on heading up to Mt Graham last
Saturday for some lighting, a three hour drive.  Running late, they decided to
collect up on Carr Canyon in the Huachucas.  At around 3:30 am, a very fresh
pslendidaria came to the light, but settled away from the sheet, on the ground.
 John ended up taking three more around (but never on) his sheet, and one in 
his 

trap.  An outstanding record!

Last night, I ventured back to the same location (round 7400 feet).  Around
1:30, a splendiadaria settled on the ground about 3 feet away from my lights,
also very fresh.  It was eventually joined by three others (the last being
detected around 4:30 am), again, all away from the lights.  My two light traps
yielded three more, for a total of seven.  Again, as with John's all were very
fresh.

I suspect that this is not a case of splendidaria becoming reestablished, but
rather a local bug that does not come directly to light that flies (high
elevation, start of the monsoon) at locations not generally collected.

cheers

bruce
Subject: Free scientific name spelling checker
From: SBSP AT aol.com
Date: Tue, 22 Jun 2010 16:33:10 EDT
Visit our web site to get a free copy of LepiLexi, a utility
that will add the scientific names of all North American
butterflies to almost all word processor spelling checkers.
And while there see a demonstration of LepiList, software
used to record lepidoptera sightings and/or collections.
 
SANTA BARBARA SOFTWARE PRODUCTS
Web site: birdbase.com
E-mail: _sbsp AT aol.com_ (mailto:sbsp AT aol.com) 
Subject: Re: SCAM YALE EMAIL ALERT
From: Stan Gorodenski <stanlep AT commspeed.net>
Date: Thu, 10 Jun 2010 17:07:02 -0700
I frequently get this kind of message. My internet provider, Commspeed, 
says they are not attempting to get my personal information, but get 
access to their servers to spread spam. It seems the reverse should be 
true, i.e., they are attempting to get MY personal information, but that 
is what they told me.
Stan


On 6/10/2010 10:23 AM, Neil Jones wrote:
> I have just received an email asking for log on details
> supposedly from Yale where Leps-l is run.
>
> This says that my account will be cancelled if
> I don't reply. Oh yeah!
>
> Do you have a bridge you can sell me too?
>
> The return address is
>
> upgrade.alert AT 9.cn
>
> I don't know the motives but this has all the hallmarks of a scam.
>
> It is very similar to bank account Phishing scams.
>
> Beware
>
> Neil Jones
> neil AT nwjones.demon.co.uk
> www.butterflyguy.com
>
>
>
>
> ------------------------------------------------------------
>   For subscription and related information about LEPS-L visit:
>
>   http://www.peabody.yale.edu/other/lepsl
>
>
>

 
 ------------------------------------------------------------ 

   For subscription and related information about LEPS-L visit:

   http://www.peabody.yale.edu/other/lepsl 
 
Subject: SCAM YALE EMAIL ALERT
From: Neil Jones <neil AT nwjones.demon.co.uk>
Date: Thu, 10 Jun 2010 18:23:56 +0100
I have just received an email asking for log on details
supposedly from Yale where Leps-l is run.

This says that my account will be cancelled if
I don't reply. Oh yeah!

Do you have a bridge you can sell me too?

The return address is

 upgrade.alert AT 9.cn

I don't know the motives but this has all the 
hallmarks of a scam.

It is very similar to bank account Phishing scams.

Beware

Neil Jones
neil AT nwjones.demon.co.uk
www.butterflyguy.com



 
 ------------------------------------------------------------ 

   For subscription and related information about LEPS-L visit:

   http://www.peabody.yale.edu/other/lepsl 
 
Subject: Acronicta heitzmani
From: "Gary Anweiler" <gganweiler AT shaw.ca>
Date: Wed, 9 Jun 2010 13:58:57 -0600
If anyone has or can obtain a specimen or two of Acronicta heitzmani that is 
less than 10 years deceased (preferably even MORE recent) we would very much 
like to beg, borrow or steal them long enough to get a leg or two for 
bar-coding. 


We would be happy to reciprocate with material from this part of the world 
(Canada) 


Thanks!

Gary Anweiler

gganweiler AT hotmail.com
  
Subject: Re: Need Help with ID's
From: "Gary Anweiler" <gganweiler AT shaw.ca>
Date: Wed, 9 Jun 2010 10:04:58 -0600
Try Eurois

Gary
----- Original Message ----- 
From: "frontier News account" 
To: 
Sent: Wednesday, June 09, 2010 7:46 AM
Subject: Need Help with ID's


> Hi all I need some help with a couple moth ID's
>
> Links:
>
> http://frontiernet.net/~trgarden/TomMidda/DSCN3683a.jpg
>
> This one I must be just overlooking when I page through my reference 
> books.
>
> Data:
> Nobles County, Minnesota USA
> June 7, 2010
> wingspan 35mm
>
>
>
> http://frontiernet.net/~trgarden/TomMidda/DSCN3690a.jpg
>
> This moth I think is Acronicta americana but it is the darkest one I have
> ever come across.
>
> Data:
> Nobles County, Minnesota USA
> June 7, 2010
> Wingspan 55mm
>
> Any help would be great
> Thanks
> Tom Middagh
>
>
>
> ------------------------------------------------------------ 
>
>   For subscription and related information about LEPS-L visit:
>
>   http://www.peabody.yale.edu/other/lepsl
>
> 


 
 ------------------------------------------------------------ 

   For subscription and related information about LEPS-L visit:

   http://www.peabody.yale.edu/other/lepsl 
 
Subject: SET LEPS-L
From: "frontier News account" <trgarden AT frontiernet.net>
Date: Wed, 9 Jun 2010 09:43:42 -0500
SET LEPS-L 

 
 ------------------------------------------------------------ 

   For subscription and related information about LEPS-L visit:

   http://www.peabody.yale.edu/other/lepsl 
 

Subject: Re: Need Help with ID's
From: Hugh McGuinness <hmcguinness AT ross.org>
Date: Wed, 9 Jun 2010 10:53:45 -0400
Hi Tom,

The first one is Apamea sordens. The second is NOT Acronicta; I think  
it is a Hadenine, but I don't know it.

Hugh

Hugh McGuinness
The Ross School
18 Goodfriend Drive
East Hampton, NY 11937
hmcguinness AT ross.org




On Jun 9, 2010, at 9:46 AM, frontier News account wrote:

> Hi all I need some help with a couple moth ID's
>
> Links:
>
> http://frontiernet.net/~trgarden/TomMidda/DSCN3683a.jpg
>
> This one I must be just overlooking when I page through my reference  
> books.
>
> Data:
> Nobles County, Minnesota USA
> June 7, 2010
> wingspan 35mm
>
>
>
> http://frontiernet.net/~trgarden/TomMidda/DSCN3690a.jpg
>
> This moth I think is Acronicta americana but it is the darkest one I  
> have
> ever come across.
>
> Data:
> Nobles County, Minnesota USA
> June 7, 2010
> Wingspan 55mm
>
> Any help would be great
> Thanks
> Tom Middagh
>
>
>
> ------------------------------------------------------------
>
>   For subscription and related information about LEPS-L visit:
>
>   http://www.peabody.yale.edu/other/lepsl
>
>


 
 ------------------------------------------------------------ 

   For subscription and related information about LEPS-L visit:

   http://www.peabody.yale.edu/other/lepsl 
 
Subject: Need Help with ID's
From: "frontier News account" <trgarden AT frontiernet.net>
Date: Wed, 9 Jun 2010 08:46:44 -0500
Hi all I need some help with a couple moth ID's

Links:

http://frontiernet.net/~trgarden/TomMidda/DSCN3683a.jpg

This one I must be just overlooking when I page through my reference books.

Data:
Nobles County, Minnesota USA
June 7, 2010
wingspan 35mm



http://frontiernet.net/~trgarden/TomMidda/DSCN3690a.jpg

This moth I think is Acronicta americana but it is the darkest one I have 
ever come across.

Data:
Nobles County, Minnesota USA
June 7, 2010
Wingspan 55mm

Any help would be great
Thanks
Tom Middagh 


 
 ------------------------------------------------------------ 

   For subscription and related information about LEPS-L visit:

   http://www.peabody.yale.edu/other/lepsl 
 

Subject: Mercury Vapor lights
From: OscartheGrouch <tondaleo AT hotmail.com>
Date: Tue, 08 Jun 2010 11:13:38 -0700
http://www.mercuryvaporlight.com/banned-Mercury-Vapor-Lights/energy-policy-act-of-2005.html

I hadn't seen this before. Can this be right? All over the US? I always 
found MV lights to be far superior to black lights as attractants for 
night insects. Please tell me it isn't so. Is there anything on the 
horizon as efficacious?

 
 ------------------------------------------------------------ 

   For subscription and related information about LEPS-L visit:

   http://www.peabody.yale.edu/other/lepsl 
 

Subject: Low Rate for LEPSOC 2010 ends this Friday!
From: "David James" <david_james AT wsu.edu>
Date: Tue, 8 Jun 2010 07:00:48 -0700
If you are planning to spend July 8-11 at LEPSOC 2010 in Leavenworth, 
Washington State (www.lepsoc2010.com) and want to register at the low rate, you 
need to act now! 


Registration at the low rate ends this Friday, June 11. Thereafter you'll need 
to pay more to experience the Bavarian magic and butterflies of Leavenworth at 
the foot of the rugged Cascade Mountains! 


Dr David G James
Associate Professor of Entomology
Department of Entomology,
Washington State University,
Irrigated Agriculture Research and Extension Center,
Bunn Road, Prosser, WA 99350, USA
Subject: RE: Fulvia X Theona
From: "Hank Brodkin" <hbrodkin AT cox.net>
Date: Mon, 7 Jun 2010 13:50:55 -0700
Jim:
Thanks for the plant ID!
The cyneas I have seen are all from above Schelite to Sawmill on the Garden
Canyon Road and at Beatty's in Miller Canyon.
I have seen one fulvia in Garden well above Schelite.  I tried to make it
into a cyneas - but it definitely was fulvia.
I have never seen cyneas as low as our place (5000').
 
Hank Brodkin
Carr Canyon, Cochise County, AZ 
33°58’24”N  118°27’39”W 
  hbrodkin AT cox.net
"Butterflies of Arizona - a Photographic Guide"
"Finding Butterflies in Arizona - a Guide to the Best Sites"
http://members.cox.net/hbrodkin/ 


  _____  

From: JimJoanJoy AT aol.com [mailto:JimJoanJoy AT aol.com] 
Sent: Monday, June 07, 2010 1:15 PM
To: hbrodkin AT cox.net; leps-l AT lists.yale.edu; DesertLeps AT yahoogroups.com;
SoWestLep AT yahoogroups.com
Cc: azbutterflies AT cox.net; raberg2 AT q.com
Subject: Re: Fulvia X Theona


In a message dated 6/7/2010 11:02:18 A.M. US Mountain Standard Time,
hbrodkin AT cox.net writes:

A couple of questions - Can both of these species use the same paintbrush
and does anyone know the species of this plant.  And does anyone know if
these species ever hybridize?  Also do either of these ever hybridize with
C. cynea (Black Checkerspot)?

Hank,
 
The shrub is Castilleja lanata. They might hybridize but have not seen any
specimens to indicate that they do.
 
As far as I have seen cyneas and fulvia do not hybridize and remain
reproductively isolated. They rarely are found together despite the close
(and I mean really close) proximity to each other and literature reports to
the contrary. I have only ever seen two fulvia in Garden Canyon. Once there
were single adults of both fulvia and cyneas on Mimosa ten yards apart near
Scheelite Canyon. That is the only time in 30 years of experience with these
two that I have seen them together. I wonder if cyneas doesn't occasionally
wander down to Crump Hill? I almost doubt they do since you don't have it
from your yard yet do you?
 
Jim B

No virus found in this incoming message.
Checked by AVG - www.avg.com
Version: 9.0.829 / Virus Database: 271.1.1/2923 - Release Date: 06/06/10
23:35:00

Subject: RE: Fulvia X Theona
From: "Hank Brodkin" <hbrodkin AT cox.net>
Date: Mon, 7 Jun 2010 13:50:55 -0700
Jim:
Thanks for the plant ID!
The cyneas I have seen are all from above Schelite to Sawmill on the Garden
Canyon Road and at Beatty's in Miller Canyon.
I have seen one fulvia in Garden well above Schelite.  I tried to make it
into a cyneas - but it definitely was fulvia.
I have never seen cyneas as low as our place (5000').
 
Hank Brodkin
Carr Canyon, Cochise County, AZ 
33°58’24”N  118°27’39”W 
  hbrodkin AT cox.net
"Butterflies of Arizona - a Photographic Guide"
"Finding Butterflies in Arizona - a Guide to the Best Sites"
http://members.cox.net/hbrodkin/ 


  _____  

From: JimJoanJoy AT aol.com [mailto:JimJoanJoy AT aol.com] 
Sent: Monday, June 07, 2010 1:15 PM
To: hbrodkin AT cox.net; leps-l AT lists.yale.edu; DesertLeps AT yahoogroups.com;
SoWestLep AT yahoogroups.com
Cc: azbutterflies AT cox.net; raberg2 AT q.com
Subject: Re: Fulvia X Theona


In a message dated 6/7/2010 11:02:18 A.M. US Mountain Standard Time,
hbrodkin AT cox.net writes:

A couple of questions - Can both of these species use the same paintbrush
and does anyone know the species of this plant.  And does anyone know if
these species ever hybridize?  Also do either of these ever hybridize with
C. cynea (Black Checkerspot)?

Hank,
 
The shrub is Castilleja lanata. They might hybridize but have not seen any
specimens to indicate that they do.
 
As far as I have seen cyneas and fulvia do not hybridize and remain
reproductively isolated. They rarely are found together despite the close
(and I mean really close) proximity to each other and literature reports to
the contrary. I have only ever seen two fulvia in Garden Canyon. Once there
were single adults of both fulvia and cyneas on Mimosa ten yards apart near
Scheelite Canyon. That is the only time in 30 years of experience with these
two that I have seen them together. I wonder if cyneas doesn't occasionally
wander down to Crump Hill? I almost doubt they do since you don't have it
from your yard yet do you?
 
Jim B

No virus found in this incoming message.
Checked by AVG - www.avg.com
Version: 9.0.829 / Virus Database: 271.1.1/2923 - Release Date: 06/06/10
23:35:00




[Non-text portions of this message have been removed]
Subject: Re: Fulvia X Theona
From: JimJoanJoy AT aol.com
Date: Mon, 7 Jun 2010 16:14:32 EDT
 
In a message dated 6/7/2010 11:02:18 A.M. US Mountain Standard Time,  
hbrodkin AT cox.net writes:

A couple of questions - Can both of these species  use the same paintbrush 
and does anyone know the species of this plant.   And does anyone know if 
these species ever hybridize?  Also do either of  these ever hybridize with C. 
cynea (Black  Checkerspot)?


Hank,
 
The shrub is Castilleja lanata. They might hybridize but have not seen any  
specimens to indicate that they do.
 
As far as I have seen cyneas and fulvia do not hybridize and remain  
reproductively isolated. They rarely are found together despite the close (and 
I 

mean really close) proximity to each other and literature reports to the  
contrary. I have only ever seen two fulvia in Garden Canyon. Once there  were 
single adults of both fulvia and cyneas on Mimosa ten yards apart near  
Scheelite Canyon. That is the only time in 30 years of experience with these 
two 

 that I have seen them together. I wonder if cyneas doesn't occasionally 
wander  down to Crump Hill? I almost doubt they do since you don't have it 
from your  yard yet do you?
 
Jim B
Subject: Re: Fulvia X Theona
From: JimJoanJoy AT aol.com
Date: Mon, 7 Jun 2010 16:14:32 EDT
 
In a message dated 6/7/2010 11:02:18 A.M. US Mountain Standard Time,  
hbrodkin AT cox.net writes:

A couple of questions - Can both of these species  use the same paintbrush 
and does anyone know the species of this plant.   And does anyone know if 
these species ever hybridize?  Also do either of  these ever hybridize with C. 
cynea (Black  Checkerspot)?


Hank,
 
The shrub is Castilleja lanata. They might hybridize but have not seen any  
specimens to indicate that they do.
 
As far as I have seen cyneas and fulvia do not hybridize and remain  
reproductively isolated. They rarely are found together despite the close (and 
I 

mean really close) proximity to each other and literature reports to the  
contrary. I have only ever seen two fulvia in Garden Canyon. Once there  were 
single adults of both fulvia and cyneas on Mimosa ten yards apart near  
Scheelite Canyon. That is the only time in 30 years of experience with these 
two 

 that I have seen them together. I wonder if cyneas doesn't occasionally 
wander  down to Crump Hill? I almost doubt they do since you don't have it 
from your  yard yet do you?
 
Jim B


[Non-text portions of this message have been removed]
Subject: Fulvia X Theona
From: "Hank Brodkin" <hbrodkin AT cox.net>
Date: Mon, 7 Jun 2010 11:01:41 -0700
Across the road from our house is a limestone hill called Crump Hill or
Grump Hill depending upon whom you ask.  There is quite a bit of paintbrush
- species unknown to me, but maybe Jim Brock or Rich Bailowitz knows.  Both
C. theona and C. fulvia (Theona and Fulvia Checkerspot) can be found in
numbers on that hill.  Occasionally a small number of both species, usually
singletons, make it over to my yard.  
I have a Wait-a-bit bush (Mimosa sp) that is in good bloom now.  A couple
days ago I noticed what I at first thought were two fulvia nectaring and
yesterday attempting to mate.  The female was larger and somewhat tattered
and the smaller male was in good shape.  I id'd the female by the "ladder"
and veining of the under hind wing, but because the other butterfly was in
good shape I took photos of it.  When I showed them to my wife, Priscilla,
she said that the photo we were looking at was a theona, and upon closer
scrutiny I realized that, as usual, she was correct.  This morning there was
one Chlosyne again on the bush that had the same damage as the female I saw
earlier.  It was indeed the fulvia, and I photographed it.
A couple of questions - Can both of these species use the same paintbrush
and does anyone know the species of this plant.  And does anyone know if
these species ever hybridize?  Also do either of these ever hybridize with
C. cynea (Black Checkerspot)?


Hank Brodkin 
Carr Canyon, Cochise County, AZ
33°58’24”N  118°27’39”W
hbrodkin AT cox.net 
"Butterflies of Arizona - a Photographic Guide"
"Finding Butterflies in Arizona - a Guide to the Best Sites"
http://members.cox.net/hbrodkin/ 

Subject: Fulvia X Theona
From: "Hank Brodkin" <hbrodkin AT cox.net>
Date: Mon, 7 Jun 2010 11:01:41 -0700
Across the road from our house is a limestone hill called Crump Hill or
Grump Hill depending upon whom you ask.  There is quite a bit of paintbrush
- species unknown to me, but maybe Jim Brock or Rich Bailowitz knows.  Both
C. theona and C. fulvia (Theona and Fulvia Checkerspot) can be found in
numbers on that hill.  Occasionally a small number of both species, usually
singletons, make it over to my yard.  
I have a Wait-a-bit bush (Mimosa sp) that is in good bloom now.  A couple
days ago I noticed what I at first thought were two fulvia nectaring and
yesterday attempting to mate.  The female was larger and somewhat tattered
and the smaller male was in good shape.  I id'd the female by the "ladder"
and veining of the under hind wing, but because the other butterfly was in
good shape I took photos of it.  When I showed them to my wife, Priscilla,
she said that the photo we were looking at was a theona, and upon closer
scrutiny I realized that, as usual, she was correct.  This morning there was
one Chlosyne again on the bush that had the same damage as the female I saw
earlier.  It was indeed the fulvia, and I photographed it.
A couple of questions - Can both of these species use the same paintbrush
and does anyone know the species of this plant.  And does anyone know if
these species ever hybridize?  Also do either of these ever hybridize with
C. cynea (Black Checkerspot)?


Hank Brodkin 
Carr Canyon, Cochise County, AZ
33°58’24”N  118°27’39”W
hbrodkin AT cox.net 
"Butterflies of Arizona - a Photographic Guide"
"Finding Butterflies in Arizona - a Guide to the Best Sites"
http://members.cox.net/hbrodkin/ 




[Non-text portions of this message have been removed]
Subject: Agrostis I.D.?
From: "Jim Mason" <jim AT gpnc.org>
Date: Mon, 7 Jun 2010 08:31:31 -0500
Is anyone able to do identification of species of Agrostis from India - or
can anyone suggest someone who could?  If so, please contact:

 

Vishal Pathania
Dept of Entomology,
CSKHPKV, 
Palampur, H.P.
India- 176062
email: pathania17 AT gmail.com

 

Jim Mason, Naturalist

Jim AT gpnc.org

Great Plains Nature Center

6232 E. 29th Street North

Wichita, KS 67220-2200

316-683-5499 x103 - voice

316-688-9555 - fax

www.gpnc.org

 
Subject: desperately seeking Helicoverpa spp samples
From: "Holder, Peter" <Peter.Holder AT lincolnuni.ac.nz>
Date: Mon, 7 Jun 2010 07:05:20 +0000
Dear Leps-L Listers

This is a re-newed requested. I am now desperately seeking adult samples of 
Helicoverpa spp. [Noctuidae], from Indonesia, any pacific island nation, China, 
India, any EU country, USA and Japan. 


I'm conducting a program assessing the value of using isotopes and trace 
element profiles to trace the origin of artificially transported insects, and 
are using H. armigera as the model insect. Am now accepting any Helicoverpa 
species. 


I'm aiming for only 4 moths per centre, but will be happy with what ever number 
come in. 

Ideally collected and stored dry (ie., not in alcohol). Samples do not need to 
be neatly pinned - any degree of worn condition is fine. 


If you have any samples that you can spare, or know of a colleague who may, 
please contact me directly: 
peter.holder AT lincolnuni.ac.nz 
or skype 
peter_w_holder 


Many thanks, Peter
ps. Huge thanks to those who have already supplied material - results looking 
very promising, see long link below 


Peter W Holder
Bio-Protection Research Centre
P O Box 84, Lincoln University 7647, Canterbury, New Zealand
phone +64 3 325 3811 ext 8199 | mobile 021 20 222 95 | skype peter_w_holder
web 
http://bioprotection.org.nz/student-project/project-description/stepping-fight-against-exotic-pest-insects 
/ www.bioprotection.org.nz 


Lincoln University, Te Whare Wanaka o Aoraki
New Zealand's Specialist Land Based University
Subject: Book about Ecuadorian butterflies
From: "Checa,Maria V" <mfcheca AT ufl.edu>
Date: Wed, 2 Jun 2010 09:49:15 -0400 (EDT)
Title:         Mariposas de Canande: sus amenazas, potencial y 
futuro
                  Butterflies from Canande: their threats, 
potential and future
Author: Maria F. Checa
Language: Spanish
Full color, couch?? paper, hard cover. 72 pp.
Trama Editorial, Quito-Ecuador.
ISBN: 978-9978-369104

Abstract
The book provides a photographic guide to the butterflies 
(Nymphalidae) from the Reserve Canande River located in the wet 
forests of the Choco hotspot of diversity in Ecuador. it also 
provides a literature review of the main deforestation factors of 
this area and shows the link between poverty and natural resources 
exploitation  in Ecuador. It also presents the benefits that 
biocommerce of butterflies has produced in developing countries 
and why this is a potential tool to promote conservation and 
provide economic benefits in Ecuador.

Limited availability in USA, US 18 (shipping included), any 
request please send an email to mfcheca AT ufl.edu


--
Checa,Maria V


 
 ------------------------------------------------------------ 

   For subscription and related information about LEPS-L visit:

   http://www.peabody.yale.edu/other/lepsl 
 
Subject: Lepsoc 2010: Deadline for submitted papers is May 28
From: "David James" <david_james AT wsu.edu>
Date: Wed, 26 May 2010 08:30:21 -0700
The (extended) deadline for submitted papers and posters ifor the Annual 
Meeting of the Lepidopterists' Society is May 27 

Meeting details below and at www.lepsoc2010.com 


  
Now that spring butterflies are on the wing in most parts of the US, its time 
to think about where you would like to be in July. 


How about the Bavarian-themed village called Leavenworth nestled in the eastern 
foothills of Washington State's spectacular 

Cascade Mountains?

The Department of Entomology, Washington State University, the Washington 
Butterfly Association and the Pacific Slope Section invite 

you to the 59th Annual Meeting of the Lepidopterists' Society which will be 
held for the first time in Washington State. 


The Young Ones! is the theme of the meeting, a double entendre for immature 
Lepidoptera and youthful lepidopterists! Two symposia, "The Young Ones: 
Research on Immatures" and "The Young Ones: Youngling Research" will feature 
invited presentations on immature stages of butterflies and moths and the 
research of young lepidopterists. In addition, contributed papers and posters 
on any aspect of Lepidoptera will also be featured. 


More details, registration forms etc can be found at www.lepsoc2010.com 

If you're a lepidopterist and havent spent time in Washington's Cascade 
Mountains in July, then this is the year to change that! 


Dr David G James
Associate Professor of Entomology
Department of Entomology,
Washington State University,
Irrigated Agriculture Research and Extension Center,
Bunn Road, Prosser, WA 99350, USA

[Non-text portions of this message have been removed]
Subject: RE: Mimic (Hypolimnas misippus) on Fort Hood, Coryell Co., Texas
From: Roger Kuhlman <rkuhlman AT hotmail.com>
Date: Tue, 18 May 2010 14:49:14 -0400
So the site is walled off by the border fence. Maybe the habitat there will now 
be protected from trampling and other negative human impacts. Sounds like a 
good thing for me. 

 
Roger Kuhlman Ann Arbor, Michigan

>
> Prior Texas record collected in 2001 at the Sabal Palm Grove, Brownsville, 
Cameron Co., Texas. This site is now walled off by the border fence... 

>
>
> Bordelon, C. & E. Knudson. 2002. The Mimic, Hypolimnas misippus (L.), in 
Texas. News of the Lepidopterists' Society 44(1): 25, 30. 

>
>
> Mike Quinn, Austin
> ________________
> Texas Entomology
> http://texasento.net
>
>
>
> On Tue, May 18, 2010 at 11:50 AM, Grkovich, Alex> wrote:
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
> Richard,
>
>
>
> Charles Bordelon took a male in S Texas a couple years ago...
>
>
>
> Alex
>
>
>
>
> ________________________________
>
> From: owner-leps-l AT lists.yale.edu [mailto:owner-leps-l AT lists.yale.edu]
> On Behalf Of Richard Worth
>
> Sent: Tuesday, May 18, 2010 11:51 AM
>
> To: entomike AT gmail.com
>
> Cc: Leps-L
>
> Subject: Re: Mimic (Hypolimnas misippus) on Fort Hood, Coryell Co., Texas
>
>
>
>
>
> Rich via Mike and others,
> Not sure about TX records. I have heard about various Florida accounts and 
myself, saw a male mimic sitting on the sand at the water line near Miami Beach 
in the summer, either in 1976 or 1981, my memory fails me and didn't collect it 
for lack of a net! 

> Unmistakable indeed, especially when, like in other species, the light hits 
the UV patch areas just right and they glow purple. This vision is indelibly 
burned into my brain. Have heard these can ride the air currents from Africa. 
TX is even farther west 

> so I would think "blown" specimens would be even more rare.
>
> All the best, Richard
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
> Richard Worth
>
>
> Entomologist / Lepidopterist
>
>
> Plant Division
>
>
> Oregon Dept. of Agriculture
>
>
> 635 Capitol St. NE
>
>
> Salem, OR 97301
>
>
> 503-986-6461
>
>
> 503-871-7108: cell
>
>
> rworth AT oda.state.or.us
>
>
> http://www.oregon.gov/ODA/index.shtml
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
> So many moths, so little time...
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
> On May 17, 2010, at 7:44 AM, Mike Quinn wrote:
>
>
>
> FYI, Mike Quinn, Austin
>
>
>
> ---------- Forwarded message ----------
>
> From: Rich Kostecke>
>
> Date: Mon, May 17, 2010 at 9:18 AM
>
> Subject: Re: Mimic (Hypolimnas misippus) on Fort Hood, Coryell Co.
>
> To: TX-BUTTERFLY AT listserv.uh.edu
>
>
>
> I have posted a pic of the Mimic on my Flickr account
> http://www.flickr.com/photos/kostecke/4615563222/. Not necessarily the most 
artistic shot, but good enough for ID purposes. Certainly looks like a male 
Mimic to me. Congrats to David Cimprich for recognizing that it was something 
really different and 

> unusual and for getting at least a few pics for documentation.
>
>
>
> Rich
>
>
>
> Richard Kostecke, Ph.D.
>
> The Nature Conservancy
>
> P.O. Box 5190, Fort Hood, Texas 76544-0190
>
> Phone: 254-288-2088 Fax: 254-288-5039
>
> E-mail: rkost73 AT yahoo.com or
> rkostecke AT tnc.org
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
> ----- Original Message ----
>
> From: Rich Kostecke>
>
>
> To: TX-butterfly>
>
> Sent: Sat, May 15, 2010 6:34:37 PM
>
> Subject: Mimic (Hypolimnas misippus) on Fort Hood, Coryell Co.
>
>
>
>
>
>
> I received a call from a colleague, David Cimprich, to report that he 
observed and photographed what appears to be a male Mimic (Hypolimnas misippus) 
on Fort Hood (Coryell Co.) this afternoon. I don't have access to the pictures 
yet, but should 

> by early next week. Anyway, this seems like a pretty obvious and unmistakable 
butterfly, but are there any other possibilities that need to be considered? He 
said it was about the size of a Gulf Fritillary more or less. 

>
>
>
>
> It looks like TX has at least one other record of this species from the Lower 
Rio Grande Valley (Cameron Co.), or are there others? 

>
>
>
> I assume this individual would be a vagrant from the Caribbean? Or, is this a 
species that gets captive-bred and released much? 

>
>
>
> Thanks,
>
>
>
> Rich
>
>
>
> Richard Kostecke, Ph.D.
>
> The Nature Conservancy
>
> P.O. Box 5190, Fort Hood, Texas 76544-0190
>
> Phone: 254-288-2088 Fax: 254-288-5039
>
> E-mail: rkost73 AT yahoo.com or
> rkostecke AT tnc.org
>
>
>
> ==================================
>
> TX-BUTTERFLY archives:
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
> 		 	   		  

 
 ------------------------------------------------------------ 

   For subscription and related information about LEPS-L visit:

   http://www.peabody.yale.edu/other/lepsl 
 
Subject: Re: Mimic (Hypolimnas misippus) on Fort Hood, Coryell Co., Texas
From: Mike Quinn <entomike AT gmail.com>
Date: Tue, 18 May 2010 12:01:36 -0500
Prior Texas record collected in 2001 at the Sabal Palm Grove, Brownsville,
Cameron Co., Texas. This site is now walled off by the border fence...

Bordelon, C. & E. Knudson. 2002. The Mimic, *Hypolimnas misippus* (L.), in
Texas. News of the Lepidopterists' Society 44(1): 25, 30.

Mike Quinn, Austin
________________
Texas Entomology
http://texasento.net


On Tue, May 18, 2010 at 11:50 AM, Grkovich, Alex wrote:

>  *Richard,*
> **
> *Charles Bordelon took a male in S Texas a couple years ago...*
> **
> *Alex*
>
>  ------------------------------
> *From:* owner-leps-l AT lists.yale.edu [mailto:owner-leps-l AT lists.yale.edu] *On
> Behalf Of *Richard Worth
> *Sent:* Tuesday, May 18, 2010 11:51 AM
> *To:* entomike AT gmail.com
> *Cc:* Leps-L
> *Subject:* Re: Mimic (Hypolimnas misippus) on Fort Hood, Coryell Co.,
> Texas
>
>  Rich via Mike and others,
> Not sure about TX records.  I have heard about various Florida accounts and
> myself, saw a male mimic sitting on the sand at the water line near Miami
> Beach in the summer, either in 1976 or 1981, my memory fails me and didn't
> collect it for lack of a net!   Unmistakable indeed, especially when, like
> in other species, the light hits the UV patch areas just right and they glow
> purple.  This vision is indelibly burned into my brain.  Have heard these
> can ride the air currents from Africa. TX is even farther west so I would
> think "blown" specimens would be even more rare.
> All the best,  Richard
>
>     Richard Worth
>
> Entomologist / Lepidopterist
>
> Plant Division
>
> Oregon Dept. of Agriculture
>
> 635 Capitol St. NE
>
> Salem, OR  97301
>
> 503-986-6461
>
> 503-871-7108: cell
>
> rworth AT oda.state.or.us
>
> http://www.oregon.gov/ODA/index.shtml
>
>  So many moths, so little time...
>
>  On May 17, 2010, at 7:44 AM, Mike Quinn wrote:
>
> FYI, Mike Quinn, Austin
>
> ---------- Forwarded message ----------
> From: Rich Kostecke 
> Date: Mon, May 17, 2010 at 9:18 AM
> Subject: Re: Mimic (Hypolimnas misippus) on Fort Hood, Coryell Co.
> To: TX-BUTTERFLY AT listserv.uh.edu
>
> I have posted a pic of the Mimic on my Flickr account
> http://www.flickr.com/photos/kostecke/4615563222/.  Not necessarily
> the most artistic shot, but good enough for ID purposes.  Certainly looks
> like a male Mimic to me.  Congrats to David Cimprich for recognizing that it
> was something really different and unusual and for getting at least a few
> pics for documentation.
>
> Rich
>
> Richard Kostecke, Ph.D.
> The Nature Conservancy
> P.O. Box 5190, Fort Hood, Texas 76544-0190
> Phone:  254-288-2088  Fax: 254-288-5039
> E-mail: rkost73 AT yahoo.com or rkostecke AT tnc.org
>
>
>
>  ----- Original Message ----
> From: Rich Kostecke 
>  To: TX-butterfly 
> Sent: Sat, May 15, 2010 6:34:37 PM
> Subject: Mimic (Hypolimnas misippus) on Fort Hood, Coryell Co.
>
>   I received a call from a colleague, David Cimprich,  to report that he
> observed and photographed what appears to be a male Mimic (Hypolimnas
> misippus) on Fort Hood (Coryell Co.) this afternoon.  I don't have access to
> the pictures yet, but should by early next week.  Anyway, this seems like a
> pretty obvious and unmistakable butterfly, but are there any other
> possibilities that need to be considered?  He said it was about the size of
> a Gulf Fritillary more or less.
>
> It looks like TX has at least one other record of this species from the
> Lower Rio Grande Valley (Cameron Co.), or are there others?
>
> I assume this individual would be a vagrant from the Caribbean?  Or, is
> this a species that gets captive-bred and released much?
>
> Thanks,
>
> Rich
>
> Richard Kostecke, Ph.D.
> The Nature Conservancy
> P.O. Box 5190, Fort Hood, Texas 76544-0190
> Phone:  254-288-2088  Fax: 254-288-5039
> E-mail: rkost73 AT yahoo.com or rkostecke AT tnc.org
>
> ==================================
>  TX-BUTTERFLY archives:
> 
>
>
Subject: RE: Mimic (Hypolimnas misippus) on Fort Hood, Coryell Co., Texas
From: "Grkovich, Alex" <agrkovich AT tmpeng.com>
Date: Tue, 18 May 2010 12:50:38 -0400
Richard,

Charles Bordelon took a male in S Texas a couple years ago...

Alex

________________________________
From: owner-leps-l AT lists.yale.edu [mailto:owner-leps-l AT lists.yale.edu] On 
Behalf Of Richard Worth 

Sent: Tuesday, May 18, 2010 11:51 AM
To: entomike AT gmail.com
Cc: Leps-L
Subject: Re: Mimic (Hypolimnas misippus) on Fort Hood, Coryell Co., Texas

Rich via Mike and others,
Not sure about TX records. I have heard about various Florida accounts and 
myself, saw a male mimic sitting on the sand at the water line near Miami Beach 
in the summer, either in 1976 or 1981, my memory fails me and didn't collect it 
for lack of a net! Unmistakable indeed, especially when, like in other species, 
the light hits the UV patch areas just right and they glow purple. This vision 
is indelibly burned into my brain. Have heard these can ride the air currents 
from Africa. TX is even farther west so I would think "blown" specimens would 
be even more rare. 

All the best,  Richard


Richard Worth

Entomologist / Lepidopterist

Plant Division

Oregon Dept. of Agriculture

635 Capitol St. NE

Salem, OR  97301

503-986-6461

503-871-7108: cell

rworth AT oda.state.or.us

http://www.oregon.gov/ODA/index.shtml

So many moths, so little time...

On May 17, 2010, at 7:44 AM, Mike Quinn wrote:

FYI, Mike Quinn, Austin

---------- Forwarded message ----------
From: Rich Kostecke >
Date: Mon, May 17, 2010 at 9:18 AM
Subject: Re: Mimic (Hypolimnas misippus) on Fort Hood, Coryell Co.
To: TX-BUTTERFLY AT listserv.uh.edu

I have posted a pic of the Mimic on my Flickr account 
http://www.flickr.com/photos/kostecke/4615563222/. Not necessarily the most 
artistic shot, but good enough for ID purposes. Certainly looks like a male 
Mimic to me. Congrats to David Cimprich for recognizing that it was something 
really different and unusual and for getting at least a few pics for 
documentation. 


Rich

Richard Kostecke, Ph.D.
The Nature Conservancy
P.O. Box 5190, Fort Hood, Texas 76544-0190
Phone:  254-288-2088  Fax: 254-288-5039
E-mail: rkost73 AT yahoo.com or 
rkostecke AT tnc.org 




----- Original Message ----
From: Rich Kostecke >
To: TX-butterfly 
> 

Sent: Sat, May 15, 2010 6:34:37 PM
Subject: Mimic (Hypolimnas misippus) on Fort Hood, Coryell Co.

I received a call from a colleague, David Cimprich, to report that he observed 
and photographed what appears to be a male Mimic (Hypolimnas misippus) on Fort 
Hood (Coryell Co.) this afternoon. I don't have access to the pictures yet, but 
should by early next week. Anyway, this seems like a pretty obvious and 
unmistakable butterfly, but are there any other possibilities that need to be 
considered? He said it was about the size of a Gulf Fritillary more or less. 


It looks like TX has at least one other record of this species from the Lower 
Rio Grande Valley (Cameron Co.), or are there others? 


I assume this individual would be a vagrant from the Caribbean? Or, is this a 
species that gets captive-bred and released much? 


Thanks,

Rich

Richard Kostecke, Ph.D.
The Nature Conservancy
P.O. Box 5190, Fort Hood, Texas 76544-0190
Phone:  254-288-2088  Fax: 254-288-5039
E-mail: rkost73 AT yahoo.com or 
rkostecke AT tnc.org 


==================================
 TX-BUTTERFLY archives:




________________________________
CAUTION PLEASE NOTE: The information contained in this transmission is intended 
to be sent only to the stated recipient of the transmission. 

If the reader of this message is not the intended recipient or the intended
recipient's agent, you are hereby notified that we do not intend to waive
any privilege that might ordinarily be attached to this communication. Any
dissemination, distribution or copying of the information contained in this
transmission is therefore prohibited. You are further asked to notify us of
any such error in transmission as soon as possible at the telephone
number/email address shown above. Thank you for your cooperation.
Subject: Re: Mimic (Hypolimnas misippus) on Fort Hood, Coryell Co., Texas
From: Richard Worth <rworth AT oda.state.or.us>
Date: Tue, 18 May 2010 08:51:15 -0700
Rich via Mike and others,
Not sure about TX records.  I have heard about various Florida  
accounts and myself, saw a male mimic sitting on the sand at the water  
line near Miami Beach in the summer, either in 1976 or 1981, my memory  
fails me and didn't collect it for lack of a net!   Unmistakable  
indeed, especially when, like in other species, the light hits the UV  
patch areas just right and they glow purple.  This vision is indelibly  
burned into my brain.  Have heard these can ride the air currents from  
Africa. TX is even farther west so I would think "blown" specimens  
would be even more rare.
All the best,  Richard

Richard Worth
Entomologist / Lepidopterist
Plant Division
Oregon Dept. of Agriculture
635 Capitol St. NE
Salem, OR  97301
503-986-6461
503-871-7108: cell
rworth AT oda.state.or.us
http://www.oregon.gov/ODA/index.shtml

So many moths, so little time...

On May 17, 2010, at 7:44 AM, Mike Quinn wrote:

> FYI, Mike Quinn, Austin
>
> ---------- Forwarded message ----------
> From: Rich Kostecke 
> Date: Mon, May 17, 2010 at 9:18 AM
> Subject: Re: Mimic (Hypolimnas misippus) on Fort Hood, Coryell Co.
> To: TX-BUTTERFLY AT listserv.uh.edu
>
> I have posted a pic of the Mimic on my Flickr account 
http://www.flickr.com/photos/kostecke/4615563222/ 

> .  Not necessarily the most artistic shot, but good enough for ID  
> purposes.  Certainly looks like a male Mimic to me.  Congrats to  
> David Cimprich for recognizing that it was something really  
> different and unusual and for getting at least a few pics for  
> documentation.
>
> Rich
>
> Richard Kostecke, Ph.D.
> The Nature Conservancy
> P.O. Box 5190, Fort Hood, Texas 76544-0190
> Phone:  254-288-2088  Fax: 254-288-5039
> E-mail: rkost73 AT yahoo.com or rkostecke AT tnc.org
>
>
>
> ----- Original Message ----
> From: Rich Kostecke 
> To: TX-butterfly 
> Sent: Sat, May 15, 2010 6:34:37 PM
> Subject: Mimic (Hypolimnas misippus) on Fort Hood, Coryell Co.
>
> I received a call from a colleague, David Cimprich,  to report that  
> he observed and photographed what appears to be a male Mimic  
> (Hypolimnas misippus) on Fort Hood (Coryell Co.) this afternoon.  I  
> don't have access to the pictures yet, but should by early next  
> week.  Anyway, this seems like a pretty obvious and unmistakable  
> butterfly, but are there any other possibilities that need to be  
> considered?  He said it was about the size of a Gulf Fritillary more  
> or less.
>
> It looks like TX has at least one other record of this species from  
> the Lower Rio Grande Valley (Cameron Co.), or are there others?
>
> I assume this individual would be a vagrant from the Caribbean?  Or,  
> is this a species that gets captive-bred and released much?
>
> Thanks,
>
> Rich
>
> Richard Kostecke, Ph.D.
> The Nature Conservancy
> P.O. Box 5190, Fort Hood, Texas 76544-0190
> Phone:  254-288-2088  Fax: 254-288-5039
> E-mail: rkost73 AT yahoo.com or rkostecke AT tnc.org
>
> ==================================
>  TX-BUTTERFLY archives:
> 
>
Subject: Fwd: Mimic (Hypolimnas misippus) on Fort Hood, Coryell Co., Texas
From: Mike Quinn <entomike AT gmail.com>
Date: Mon, 17 May 2010 09:44:57 -0500
FYI, Mike Quinn, Austin


---------- Forwarded message ----------
From: Rich Kostecke 
Date: Mon, May 17, 2010 at 9:18 AM
Subject: Re: Mimic (Hypolimnas misippus) on Fort Hood, Coryell Co.
To: TX-BUTTERFLY AT listserv.uh.edu

I have posted a pic of the Mimic on my Flickr account
http://www.flickr.com/photos/kostecke/4615563222/.  Not necessarily the most
artistic shot, but good enough for ID purposes.  Certainly looks like a
male Mimic to me.  Congrats to David Cimprich for recognizing that it was
something really different and unusual and for getting at least a few pics
for documentation.

Rich

Richard Kostecke, Ph.D.
The Nature Conservancy
P.O. Box 5190, Fort Hood, Texas 76544-0190
Phone:  254-288-2088  Fax: 254-288-5039
E-mail: rkost73 AT yahoo.com or rkostecke AT tnc.org



----- Original Message ----
From: Rich Kostecke 
To: TX-butterfly 
Sent: Sat, May 15, 2010 6:34:37 PM
Subject: Mimic (Hypolimnas misippus) on Fort Hood, Coryell Co.

I received a call from a colleague, David Cimprich,  to report that he
observed and photographed what appears to be a male Mimic (Hypolimnas
misippus) on Fort Hood (Coryell Co.) this afternoon.  I don't have access to
the pictures yet, but should by early next week.  Anyway, this seems like a
pretty obvious and unmistakable butterfly, but are there any other
possibilities that need to be considered?  He said it was about the size of
a Gulf Fritillary more or less.

It looks like TX has at least one other record of this species from the
Lower Rio Grande Valley (Cameron Co.), or are there others?

I assume this individual would be a vagrant from the Caribbean?  Or, is this
a species that gets captive-bred and released much?

Thanks,

Rich

Richard Kostecke, Ph.D.
The Nature Conservancy
P.O. Box 5190, Fort Hood, Texas 76544-0190
Phone:  254-288-2088  Fax: 254-288-5039
E-mail: rkost73 AT yahoo.com or rkostecke AT tnc.org

==================================
 TX-BUTTERFLY archives:
Subject: Re: Red Admiral Invasion Year in Great Lakes States
From: "Bitzer, Royce J [ENT]" <mariposa AT iastate.edu>
Date: Wed, 12 May 2010 10:46:05 -0500
Leps-L members:



I have been busy for the last several weeks tracking the course of this 
migration, and mapping Red Admiral presence and migratory activity at the Red 
Admiral and Painted Lady Research Site. This migration has been broad and 
extensive, with moderate to high numbers of butterflies and definite northward 
migratory flights observed from western Iowa to southern Quebec and 
Massachusetts. 

Subject: Re: Red Admiral Invasion Year in Great Lake States?
From: James McDermott <jamesryan04 AT gmail.com>
Date: Wed, 12 May 2010 08:03:24 -0700
Likewise, huge numbers near Dallas in the last week. Lets just say I can't
see through my bait traps.

James McDermott



On Tue, May 11, 2010 at 11:36 PM,  wrote:

> Expect a lot of Red Admirals this year as they are swarming in Central
> Texas. I have not (since 1968) seen them this abundant here. Larvae have
> been feeding on Pellitory which had a bumper crop after the wet winter.
> ........Chris Durden
>
>
> Quoting Roger Kuhlman :
>
>
>>
>> I was wondering if other people in the Great Lake States region are
>>  noticing a much larger than normal influx of Red Admirals (Vanessa
>>  atalanta) this year. Since April 30 when good numbers of Red  Admirals ( 30
>> to 40 at single sites) were first reported in both  Northwest Monroe County
>> and Southwest Washtenaw County of Southeast  Michigan, Red Admiral migrants
>> seem to be everywhere. So far they  have not reached the highest levels of
>> the last Vanessa invasion  year of 2001 or have been accompanied by major
>> influxes of sister  Vanessa species American Painted Lady (V. virginensis)
>> and Painted  Lady (V. cardui) but the season is young.
>>
>> Roger Kuhlman
>> Greater Washtenaw Butterfly Survey
>> Ann Arbor, Michigan
>> 5/11/2010
>>
>>
>>  ------------------------------------------------------------
>>
>>   For subscription and related information about LEPS-L visit:
>>
>>   http://www.peabody.yale.edu/other/lepsl
>>
>>
>>
>>
>
>
>
>
> ------------------------------------------------------------
>
>  For subscription and related information about LEPS-L visit:
>
>  http://www.peabody.yale.edu/other/lepsl
>
>
Subject: Re: Red Admiral Invasion Year in Great Lake States?
From: drdn AT mail.utexas.edu
Date: Wed, 12 May 2010 01:36:15 -0500
Expect a lot of Red Admirals this year as they are swarming in Central  
Texas. I have not (since 1968) seen them this abundant here. Larvae  
have been feeding on Pellitory which had a bumper crop after the wet  
winter.
........Chris Durden

Quoting Roger Kuhlman :

>
>
> I was wondering if other people in the Great Lake States region are   
> noticing a much larger than normal influx of Red Admirals (Vanessa   
> atalanta) this year. Since April 30 when good numbers of Red   
> Admirals ( 30 to 40 at single sites) were first reported in both   
> Northwest Monroe County and Southwest Washtenaw County of Southeast   
> Michigan, Red Admiral migrants seem to be everywhere. So far they   
> have not reached the highest levels of the last Vanessa invasion   
> year of 2001 or have been accompanied by major influxes of sister   
> Vanessa species American Painted Lady (V. virginensis) and Painted   
> Lady (V. cardui) but the season is young.
>
> Roger Kuhlman
> Greater Washtenaw Butterfly Survey
> Ann Arbor, Michigan
> 5/11/2010
>
>
>  ------------------------------------------------------------
>
>    For subscription and related information about LEPS-L visit:
>
>    http://www.peabody.yale.edu/other/lepsl
>
>
>




 
 ------------------------------------------------------------ 

   For subscription and related information about LEPS-L visit:

   http://www.peabody.yale.edu/other/lepsl 
 
Subject: RE: Red Admiral Invasion Year in Great Lake States?
From: "Jonathan Sylvestre" <josylvestre AT sympatico.ca>
Date: Tue, 11 May 2010 18:14:41 -0400
Here in center Québec (Manseau) I observed a great number of V. atalanta
since a week ore more. They are nearly everywhere and they are flying in a
SW-NE direction most of the time. If I remember correctly the lasts times
they invaded Quebec in great quantity, I can tell that they are more
numerous than ever !

I did not see any other Vanessa species yet, but i did no field trip since a
week.. its pretty cold here and we had some snow yesterday. The V.atalanta
seem to handle that well.


Jonathan Sylvestre


-----Message d'origine-----
De : owner-leps-l AT lists.yale.edu [mailto:owner-leps-l AT lists.yale.edu] De la
part de Roger Kuhlman
Envoyé : 11 mai 2010 14:57
À : Leps List
Objet : Red Admiral Invasion Year in Great Lake States?



I was wondering if other people in the Great Lake States region are noticing
a much larger than normal influx of Red Admirals (Vanessa atalanta) this
year. Since April 30 when good numbers of Red Admirals ( 30 to 40 at single
sites) were first reported in both Northwest Monroe County and Southwest
Washtenaw County of Southeast Michigan, Red Admiral migrants seem to be
everywhere. So far they have not reached the highest levels of the last
Vanessa invasion year of 2001 or have been accompanied by major influxes of
sister Vanessa species American Painted Lady (V. virginensis) and Painted
Lady (V. cardui) but the season is young.
 
Roger Kuhlman
Greater Washtenaw Butterfly Survey
Ann Arbor, Michigan
5/11/2010 		 	   		  

 
 ------------------------------------------------------------ 

   For subscription and related information about LEPS-L visit:

   http://www.peabody.yale.edu/other/lepsl 
 



 
 ------------------------------------------------------------ 

   For subscription and related information about LEPS-L visit:

   http://www.peabody.yale.edu/other/lepsl 
 
Subject: Re: Red Admiral Invasion Year in Great Lake States?
From: Sheri Moreau <akindofmagick1 AT yahoo.com>
Date: Tue, 11 May 2010 14:22:26 -0700 (PDT)
Red Admirals were unbelievably profuse in Oswego, New York the summer of 2001; 
I arrived in mid-May and about three weeks later found a large, protected 
nettle patch between a couple of greenhouses at a plant nursery that nurtured 
literally thousands of caterpillars for weeks.  Never seen anything like it, 
before or since, for that species. 

 
Sheri
Maryland









--- On Tue, 5/11/10, Paul Cherubini  wrote:
      
>A similar outbreak occurred in May 2001, but that one was more
concentrated in the upper Midwest including Kansas and Nebraska.




      
Subject: Re: Red Admiral Invasion Year in Great Lake States?
From: Gary Sibio <garysibio AT gmail.com>
Date: Tue, 11 May 2010 15:17:20 -0500
I've been seeing more than normal in Chicago. I don't keep detailed
records so I can't be more specific.

Gary

On 5/11/10, Roger Kuhlman  wrote:
>
>
> I was wondering if other people in the Great Lake States region are noticing
> a much larger than normal influx of Red Admirals (Vanessa atalanta) this
> year. Since April 30 when good numbers of Red Admirals ( 30 to 40 at single
> sites) were first reported in both Northwest Monroe County and Southwest
> Washtenaw County of Southeast Michigan, Red Admiral migrants seem to be
> everywhere. So far they have not reached the highest levels of the last
> Vanessa invasion year of 2001 or have been accompanied by major influxes of
> sister Vanessa species American Painted Lady (V. virginensis) and Painted
> Lady (V. cardui) but the season is young.
>
> Roger Kuhlman
> Greater Washtenaw Butterfly Survey
> Ann Arbor, Michigan
> 5/11/2010 		 	   		
>
>
>  ------------------------------------------------------------
>
>    For subscription and related information about LEPS-L visit:
>
>    http://www.peabody.yale.edu/other/lepsl
>
>
>


-- 
Gary J Sibio

If you would like to see my photos, click here:
http://www.flickr.com/photos/garysibio

 
 ------------------------------------------------------------ 

   For subscription and related information about LEPS-L visit:

   http://www.peabody.yale.edu/other/lepsl 
 
Subject: Re: Red Admiral Invasion Year in Great Lake States?
From: Paul Cherubini <monarch AT saber.net>
Date: Tue, 11 May 2010 12:40:45 -0700
Yes, east of Nebraska and Kansas, there has been an outbreak of
Red Admirals this spring and they have already reached eastern Canada.
        
A similar outbreak occurred in May 2001, but that one was more
concentrated in the upper Midwest including Kansas and Nebraska.

Paul Cherubini
El Dorado, Calif.

 
 ------------------------------------------------------------ 

   For subscription and related information about LEPS-L visit:

   http://www.peabody.yale.edu/other/lepsl 
 
Subject: Red Admiral Invasion Year in Great Lake States?
From: Roger Kuhlman <rkuhlman AT hotmail.com>
Date: Tue, 11 May 2010 14:56:35 -0400

I was wondering if other people in the Great Lake States region are noticing a 
much larger than normal influx of Red Admirals (Vanessa atalanta) this year. 
Since April 30 when good numbers of Red Admirals ( 30 to 40 at single sites) 
were first reported in both Northwest Monroe County and Southwest Washtenaw 
County of Southeast Michigan, Red Admiral migrants seem to be everywhere. So 
far they have not reached the highest levels of the last Vanessa invasion year 
of 2001 or have been accompanied by major influxes of sister Vanessa species 
American Painted Lady (V. virginensis) and Painted Lady (V. cardui) but the 
season is young. 

 
Roger Kuhlman
Greater Washtenaw Butterfly Survey
Ann Arbor, Michigan
5/11/2010 		 	   		  

 
 ------------------------------------------------------------ 

   For subscription and related information about LEPS-L visit:

   http://www.peabody.yale.edu/other/lepsl 
 
Subject: LepSoc2010: Register Now!
From: "David James" <david_james AT wsu.edu>
Date: Mon, 10 May 2010 07:37:38 -0700
Have you registered yet for LepSoc 2010? 

The Annual Conference of the Lepidopterists Society will be held July 8-11 in 
the beautiful Bavarian-themed mountain village of Leavenworth, Washington at 
the Enzian Inn. 


Go to www.lepsoc2010.com for details on registration and paper submittal. You 
can also find details of presenters and topics in our 2 symposia focusing on 
the immature stages of Lepidoptera and young lepidopterists (The Young Ones!). 


The deadline for submitting a contributed paper or poster presentation has been 
extended to May 28. 

The deadline for registering at the low rate has been extended to June 11. 
Thereafter, the rate increases. 


Dont miss this opportunity of spending a few summer days in one of the most 
beautiful and scenic and Lepidoptera-rich, locations in the Pacific Northwest! 


Dr David G James
Associate Professor of Entomology
Department of Entomology,
Washington State University,
Irrigated Agriculture Research and Extension Center,
Bunn Road, Prosser, WA 99350, USA
Subject: DesertLeps
From: Stan Gorodenski <stanlep AT commspeed.net>
Date: Fri, 07 May 2010 14:09:01 -0700
I am guessing many do not know about a discussion group called 
DesertLeps, founded February 25, 2006. The purpose of this message is to 
make you aware of it. In additon to including the Southwestern U.S. 
states (as the name might imply), the discussion group also includes any 
state or area with desert or desert like conditions ( e.g., high 
deserts, areas with significantly lower annual rainfall totals). 
Consequently, it also includes Texas, areas of Mexico peripatric to the 
U.S., and all Western states (with the exception of Hawaii and Alaska) 
as defined by the US Census Bureau. The totality of these states (plus 
Mexico) generally corresponds to the California and Rocky Mountain 
subregions of the Nearctic as defined by Wallace, and the "Arid" 
subregion as defined by Allen (which closely corresponds to the Wallace 
definition).

You can learn more about the group at 
http://pets.groups.yahoo.com/group/DesertLeps/   .
ButterflyDigest does not have the recent discussions that took place in 
DesertLeps, such as the 240 messages from last month and the ones to 
date for this month. You have to be a member to view them.
Sincerely,
Stan Gorodenski







 
 ------------------------------------------------------------ 

   For subscription and related information about LEPS-L visit:

   http://www.peabody.yale.edu/other/lepsl 
 
Subject: Opler and Powell book images now available
From: Felix Sperling <felix.sperling AT ualberta.ca>
Date: Wed, 5 May 2010 11:12:55 -0600
Be sure to search for Photographer "Contains" Powell and not "Begins  
with" or "Equals". My mistake for using the "=" in my message. Each  
search would require a different search string to get the results you  
want.

Kip

-- 
Kipling W. Will
Associate Professor/Insect Systematist
Associate Director,Essig Museum of Entomology

mail to:
137 Mulford Hall
ESPM Dept.- Organisms & Environment Div.
University of California
Berkeley, California 94720

phone 510-642-4296
fax 510-643-5438

 
 ------------------------------------------------------------ 

   For subscription and related information about LEPS-L visit:

   http://www.peabody.yale.edu/other/lepsl 
 
Subject: Powell and Opler book Images now available
From: Felix Sperling <felix.sperling AT ualberta.ca>
Date: Tue, 04 May 2010 22:03:01 -0600
Begin forwarded message:

> From: "Kipling (Kip) Will" 
> Date: May 4, 2010 7:34:32 PM MDT (CA)
>
> Dear All,
> Beautiful images and full data for 1228 itty bitty moths as a  
> companion to Jerry Powell & Paul Opler's book "Moths of Western  
> North America" are now available for your perusal via the Essig and  
> CalPhotos
> databases. This a great addition to our database records and allows  
> for viewing images at a much higher resolution and detail than the  
> book.
>
> You can access images, linked back to data records at
> http://calphotos.berkeley.edu/
> search for Photographer = Powell
>
> Here is a pre-made search
> http://bit.ly/9dnOns   (300 thumbnails at once at this link...)
>
> You can access data records that link to the images by using a  
> taxonomic
> search at
> http://essigdb.berkeley.edu/
>
> enjoy,
> -- 
> Kipling W. Will
> Associate Professor/Insect Systematist
> Associate Director,Essig Museum of Entomology
>
> mail to:
> 137 Mulford Hall
> ESPM Dept.- Organisms & Environment Div.
> University of California
> Berkeley, California 94720
>
> phone 510-642-4296
> fax 510-643-5438
>
Subject: Re: Fwd: Palaeophobetron perornata - CenTex Apr 28, 2010
From: Bruce Walsh <jbwalsh AT u.arizona.edu>
Date: Tue, 4 May 2010 16:09:01 -0700
Quoting Mike Quinn :

> Maury Heiman photographed this beast of a limacodid just west of San
> Antonio, TX late last month. Apparently less than 5 U.S. records.
> Palaeophobetron perornata photos
> http://bugguide.net/node/view/392009
>


Awesome!  Three of those records are from SE Arizona, we so will keep our eyes
open down here!


 
 ------------------------------------------------------------ 

   For subscription and related information about LEPS-L visit:

   http://www.peabody.yale.edu/other/lepsl 
 
Subject: Fwd: Palaeophobetron perornata - CenTex Apr 28, 2010
From: Mike Quinn <entomike AT gmail.com>
Date: Tue, 4 May 2010 17:38:51 -0500
Maury Heiman photographed this beast of a limacodid just west of San
Antonio, TX late last month. Apparently less than 5 U.S. records.

Mike Quinn, Austin

---------- Forwarded message ----------
From: Maury Heiman 
Date: Tue, May 4, 2010 at 8:20 AM
Subject: Palaeophobetron perornata photos posted
To: TX-BUTTERFLY AT listserv.uh.edu

Palaeophobetron perornata photos
http://bugguide.net/node/view/392009

enjoy!

Maury Heiman
Medina County

=================================
 TX-BUTTERFLY archives:
http://listserv.uh.edu/archives/tx-butterfly.html


 
 ------------------------------------------------------------ 

   For subscription and related information about LEPS-L visit:

   http://www.peabody.yale.edu/other/lepsl 
 
Subject: RE: Relaxing and setting hesperiidae specimens
From: "Grkovich, Alex" <agrkovich AT tmpeng.com>
Date: Mon, 3 May 2010 17:25:19 -0400
Andrew,

First, you never know (from MY experience at least) how a skipper will turn 
out. One will spread just fine after relaxing; then just when you're feeling 
good about yourself and how you've mastered spreading skippers,the next one 
will get ruined totally...But... 


First, there is the "Klots Method" of making small cuts to the FW and HW 
muscles, in order to "loosen" the muscles and allow for more effective 
movements of the wings during the spreading process...Check the 1951 Klots 
Field Guide for this method...I personal have never used this, because there is 
the inherent danger of cutting the wings too high and thus cutting them off... 


First off, the specimen must be as thoroughly relaxed as possible. I use a 
tupperware container, about 1-3/4 inch high; I place sponges in the bottom of 
the container. The sponges are soaked in HOT tap water, then you wring out the 
excess water and place the sponges in the container. Then I place a plaster 
trellice, or just a piece of flexible and thin screen material over the 
sponges. The specimens then rest on the outside of the glassine envelopes (each 
one on it's envelope so the data doesn't get mixed up of course). And then a 
large envelope cut open into a flat piece of "paper" is placed over the top of 
the specimens on their envelopes...Now what I have found is also important is 
to let the specimens relax inside the container over dry heat, such as fintube 
radiation, or as I use, a dehumidification heater ("soft heat"), or you can 
leave the container out in the sunlight; but whatever, the relaxing specimens 
need to stay warm...Using this method, a large skipper should ! 

 be relaxed in approx. 12 hours or maybe a little more for a very large 
specimen... 


When taken out (without the specimen getting very wet), then you hold the 
specimen by the thorax by your fingertips, and gently squeeze the thorax at the 
wing muscles to "loosen them"...Then place the pin through the thorax. Now, 
take a set of tweezers, and further work the wing muscles with the tweezers - 
especially the hindwings which as you said, a re particularly a problem...Work 
them real well, but without of course damaging the wings...Then place the 
specimen on the spreading board and go to work...I use #1 pins as the spreading 
"tool"... 


Another thing that can be done is this: About 1/2 to 2/3 through the relaxing 
process, turn the specimens over in the relaxing box, thus allowing both sides 
of the wings to be in direct "contact"" with the sponges... 


Anyway, expect to ruin a number of specimens...Practice first on "Junk" or 
"Trash Bugs", like Silver Spotted Skippers, Long Dashes, European Skippers and 
the like.. then go ahead and try not to risk ruining your stuff from Cyprus... 


Good luck...and you'll probably need it...

I am sure that others will have better methods than mine...

Alex

-----Original Message-----
From: owner-leps-l AT lists.yale.edu [mailto:owner-leps-l AT lists.yale.edu] On 
Behalf Of Andrew Torry 

Sent: Monday, May 03, 2010 4:46 PM
To: Leps list
Subject: Re: Relaxing and setting hesperiidae specimens

Hi Folks, I need some advice.

I recently came back home from a collecting trip in Cyprus and took a short 
series of Gegenes pumilio (Pygmy Skipper). The specimens were kept frozen 
whilst on Cyprus and were only defrosted for the journey home. 


I have discovered that of all the specimens I collected these are completely 
unsettable. The wings seem to be absolutely locked in the closed position and 
any attempt to relax them and spread them result in a destroyed specimen (The 
hind wing usually splits along a vein the moment it is moved). 


Anyone any ideas on how to get these thing set!

Regards

Andrew Torry



 ------------------------------------------------------------

   For subscription and related information about LEPS-L visit:

   http://www.peabody.yale.edu/other/lepsl



CAUTION PLEASE NOTE: The information contained in this transmission is intended 
to be sent only to the stated recipient of the transmission. 

If the reader of this message is not the intended recipient or the intended
recipient's agent, you are hereby notified that we do not intend to waive
any privilege that might ordinarily be attached to this communication. Any
dissemination, distribution or copying of the information contained in this
transmission is therefore prohibited. You are further asked to notify us of
any such error in transmission as soon as possible at the telephone
number/email address shown above. Thank you for your cooperation.


 
 ------------------------------------------------------------ 

   For subscription and related information about LEPS-L visit:

   http://www.peabody.yale.edu/other/lepsl 
 
Subject: Re: Relaxing and setting hesperiidae specimens
From: Bruce Walsh <jbwalsh AT u.arizona.edu>
Date: Mon, 3 May 2010 14:18:46 -0700
Andrew:

  I use a very small needle to inject nearly boiling water into the thorax.  I
place water in a cup and microwave until it starts to steam.  This trick often
works

cheers

bruce


 
 ------------------------------------------------------------ 

   For subscription and related information about LEPS-L visit:

   http://www.peabody.yale.edu/other/lepsl 
 
Subject: Re: Relaxing and setting hesperiidae specimens
From: Andrew Torry <A.P.K.Torry AT exeter.ac.uk>
Date: Mon, 03 May 2010 21:46:22 +0100
Hi Folks, I need some advice.

I recently came back home from a collecting trip in Cyprus and took a 
short series
of Gegenes pumilio (Pygmy Skipper). The specimens were kept frozen 
whilst on Cyprus
and were only defrosted for the journey home.

I have discovered that of all the specimens I collected these are 
completely unsettable. The wings
seem to be absolutely locked in the closed position and any attempt to 
relax them and spread them
result in a destroyed specimen (The hind wing usually splits along a 
vein the moment it is moved).

Anyone any ideas on how to get these thing set!

Regards

Andrew Torry


 
 ------------------------------------------------------------ 

   For subscription and related information about LEPS-L visit:

   http://www.peabody.yale.edu/other/lepsl 
 
Subject: Lepidoptera Course in June
From: Hugh McGuinness <hmcguinness AT ross.org>
Date: Thu, 29 Apr 2010 00:32:41 -0400
Hello Lep-lovers (Please excuse the cross-post)

I am writing to let you know about a wonderful Lep course being  
offered in June at Eagle Hill in Maine. Even though many of you might  
never consider taking a course, I enrolled several years ago, and it  
was an incredible experience that propelled me into doing research on  
Leps. The instructor Brian Scholtens, who is a professor at the  
College of Charleston, is a wonderful teacher, with a comprehensive  
knowledge of butterflies and moths. His entomological knowledge is so  
comprehensive that I remember during lectures feeling as if I could  
imagine what it is like to be an insect. Further, he will mold the  
course to fit the interests of students; so for example, it can be  
geared towards butterflies if that is the interest of most of the  
students. I have even heard a rumor that participants in the course  
will have the option of participating in a Bioblitz at the station.

The Humboldt Research Station, where the course takes place, is rustic  
but with very nice accomodations. It is in a beautiful setting located  
along the upper coast in Maine. There is a great diversity of habitats  
to explore both at the station and in the surrounding area, which  
results in a large number of species being encountered. I remember  
photographing moths (many of which I have not seen since) to the calls  
of both Barred and Saw Whet Owl. The food was excellent.

A description of the course, as well as the list of the courses  
offered at the station, can be found at: 
http://www.eaglehill.us/programs/nhs/nhs-calendar.shtml 

. There is a second, simultaneous course at the station (this year on  
sterile crustose lichens, of all things), which makes for interesting  
company at meals.

So if you are looking for a way to expand your knowledge of Leps, or  
miss going away to summer camp, or just want to get away from  
everything for a highly engaging week, check out the link above. Feel  
free to respond to me off-line.

Information on lodging options, meals, and costs may be found at 
http://www.eaglehill.us/programs/general/application-info.shtml 


There is an online application form at 
http://www.eaglehill.us/programs/general/application-web.shtml 


You can contact the station directly at: The Humboldt Institute, PO  
Box 9, Steuben, ME 04680-0009.

207-546-2821. Fax 207-546-3042 e-mail: office AT eaglehill.us



Hugh

Hugh McGuinness
The Ross School
18 Goodfriend Drive
East Hampton, NY 11937
hmcguinness AT ross.org



Subject: Arizona Lep course: Still openings!
From: Bruce Walsh <jbwalsh AT u.arizona.edu>
Date: Wed, 28 Apr 2010 14:41:39 -0700
Lepsters:

There are still a few openings for the week-long Lep course this August (7-14)
at the SW Research Station in Portal Arizona, in the heart of the Chirichahua
Mts.

course website:  www.lepcourse.org

Application form for 2010 course can be found on the website.  It is due by 7
June 2010. Final notification will occur by 21 June.

Tuition for the course is $900 for students and $1000 for non-students

Details:

Held at the SouthWest Research Station (SWRS) in the Chirichahua Mountains in 
SE 

Arizona (a 2 1/2 hour drive from Tucson), the focus of the lep course is to
train graduate students, post-docs, faculty, and serious citizen-scientists in
the classification and identification of adult lepidoptera and their larvae.

Topics to be covered include an extensive introduction into adult and larval
morphology with a focus on taxonomically-important traits, extensive field work
on both adults and larvae, collecting and curatoral techniques, genitalic
dissection and preparation, larval classification, use (and abuse) of DNA bar
coding, and general issues in lepidoptera systematics, ecology, and evolution.

THE LOCATION:

With its extensive series of Sky-Island mountain ranges, SE Arizona has the
highest lepidoptera diversity in the US. With low desert scrub, oak and mixed
oak-pine woodland, lush riparian, juniper, Douglas fir, and mountain meadow
habitats all within a 40 minute drive from the station, the SWRS is an ideal
location from which to sample this diversity (of both habitats and species).

Instructors:

Jim Brock, Tucson
Dr. John Brown, USDA and the Smithsonian Museum
P. D. Hulce, SW Research Station
Dr. Jim Miller, American Museum of Natural History
Professor Ray Nagle, University of Arizona
Dr. Chris Schmidt, Canadian National Collection
Professor Bruce Walsh, University of Arizona
Professor Ian Watkinson, Arizona Western College/Northern Arizona University


 
 ------------------------------------------------------------ 

   For subscription and related information about LEPS-L visit:

   http://www.peabody.yale.edu/other/lepsl 
 
Subject: Arizona Lep course: Still openings!
From: Bruce Walsh <jbwalsh AT u.arizona.edu>
Date: Wed, 28 Apr 2010 14:41:39 -0700
Lepsters:

There are still a few openings for the week-long Lep course this August (7-14)
at the SW Research Station in Portal Arizona, in the heart of the Chirichahua
Mts.

course website:  www.lepcourse.org

Application form for 2010 course can be found on the website.  It is due by 7
June 2010. Final notification will occur by 21 June.

Tuition for the course is $900 for students and $1000 for non-students

Details:

Held at the SouthWest Research Station (SWRS) in the Chirichahua Mountains in 
SE 

Arizona (a 2 1/2 hour drive from Tucson), the focus of the lep course is to
train graduate students, post-docs, faculty, and serious citizen-scientists in
the classification and identification of adult lepidoptera and their larvae.

Topics to be covered include an extensive introduction into adult and larval
morphology with a focus on taxonomically-important traits, extensive field work
on both adults and larvae, collecting and curatoral techniques, genitalic
dissection and preparation, larval classification, use (and abuse) of DNA bar
coding, and general issues in lepidoptera systematics, ecology, and evolution.

THE LOCATION:

With its extensive series of Sky-Island mountain ranges, SE Arizona has the
highest lepidoptera diversity in the US. With low desert scrub, oak and mixed
oak-pine woodland, lush riparian, juniper, Douglas fir, and mountain meadow
habitats all within a 40 minute drive from the station, the SWRS is an ideal
location from which to sample this diversity (of both habitats and species).

Instructors:

Jim Brock, Tucson
Dr. John Brown, USDA and the Smithsonian Museum
P. D. Hulce, SW Research Station
Dr. Jim Miller, American Museum of Natural History
Professor Ray Nagle, University of Arizona
Dr. Chris Schmidt, Canadian National Collection
Professor Bruce Walsh, University of Arizona
Professor Ian Watkinson, Arizona Western College/Northern Arizona University
Subject: Printed copies of ZooKeys
From: Bruce Walsh <jbwalsh AT u.arizona.edu>
Date: Tue, 27 Apr 2010 20:17:49 -0700
I posted nformation (below) a few months about about five special issues
of the journal ZooKeys dealing with issues on western (and other) moths.  My
printed (softbound) copies just arrived today, and they look great!  All of the
articles are free online, but its nice to have a printed version around!


===========


As previously mentioned here, the on-line journal ZooKeys has recently 
published 

five major issues on North American moths, which are free online as pdf files,
http://pensoftonline.net/zookeys/index.php/journal/announcement/view/15
A list of the five is given at the end of this email.

I just heard back from the publisher.  Here are the details (and prices) for
ordering printed versions

The prices for the separate issues are as follows:
#   9 - EURO 29
# 30 - EURO 32
# 38 - EURO 84
# 39 - EURO 52
# 40 - EURO 48
there is a 15% discount if you order all five.  Shipping is extra (roughly 55
Eur for airmail).  The best way to order these would be to send an email to
orders AT pensoft.net.

the issues

“Contributions to the systematics of North American macro-moths” (ZooKeys 9, 
May 

2009, 134 pp.) and “Contributions …II” (ZooKeys 39, March 2010, 268 pp.) 
include 

16 papers contributed by 22 authors on the systematics of macro-moths of North
and Central America.

A revision of the noctuid genus Lasionycta (ZooKeys 30, Dec 2009, 156 pp.)
included keys, descriptions, and illustrations of 43 species, 17 new.

“An annotated check list of the Lepidoptera of Alberta, Canada” (ZooKeys 38,
March 2010, 549 pp.) lists 2367 species with 171 distributional or taxonomic
footnotes.

“Annotated check list of the Noctuoidea of North America north of Mexico”
(ZooKeys 40, March 2010, 239 pp.) lists 3693 species and includes 716 taxonomic
notes and 331 literature references documenting all changes from the previous
1983 check list.



 
 ------------------------------------------------------------ 

   For subscription and related information about LEPS-L visit:

   http://www.peabody.yale.edu/other/lepsl