Birdingonthe.Net

Recent Postings from
The Australia Birding List

> Home > Mail
> Alerts

Updated on Saturday, November 7 at 08:45 AM ET
The most recently received Mail is at the top.


Zebra Dove,©Barry Kent Mackay

7 Nov RE: Re: Recording data ["Andrew Bell" ]
7 Nov The name keeps changing, but the saga continues... [Luke Shelley ]
6 Nov Little Stint (South Drainage Lake, Woorinen VIC) follow up [Peter Lansley ]
7 Nov RE: Wildiaries versus Flickr ["Robert Inglis" ]
7 Nov RE: Wildiaries versus Flickr [Simon Mustoe ]
7 Nov Re: Wildiaries versus Flickr [Dave Torr ]
7 Nov RE: Hall's Babbler Fowler's Gap ["Jeff Davies" ]
5 Nov Re: Hall's Babbler Fowler's Gap ["Chris Brandis" ]
5 Nov RE: Hall's Babbler Fowler's Gap ["Tim Dolby" ]
5 Nov Re: Satin-Leaden Flycatchers again ["Graham Turner" ]
7 Nov Re: Re: Recording data ["Ross Macfarlane" ]
6 Nov RE: Wildiaries versus Flickr [Simon Mustoe ]
6 Nov Re: Twitter Problems [Chris ]
6 Nov Re: Twitter Problems [Chris ]
6 Nov Twitter Problems [Simon Mustoe ]
7 Nov Bowra Report (Short) ["Steve" ]
6 Nov Yellow-backed Lory - Not a new Australian Bird ["Philip Veerman" ]
6 Nov RE: Nepean Weir sightings ["Paul Dodd" ]
6 Nov Nepean Weir sightings [Ákos Lumnitzer ]
5 Nov Rfi. Duraki [John Hammond ]
6 Nov RE: Little Stint at Woorinen VIC 02 November 2009 [Peter Ewin ]
6 Nov Re: Yellow Backed Lory - Not a new Australian Bird ["Tom and Mandy Wilson" ]
5 Nov Re: Rare Bird Alert Website ["Wendy" ]
5 Nov crakes ["ninderry" ]
5 Nov RE: Pay for Rare Bird Alert...surely not? ["Tony Russell" ]
5 Nov Re: Rare Bird Alert Website [Peter Shute ]
6 Nov RE: Pay for Rare Bird Alert...surely not? ["Tony Russell" ]
6 Nov RE: One birder tackles the technology- TwitchathononTwitter ["Paul Dodd" ]
6 Nov RE: Re: Hall's Babbler Fowler's Gap [Peter Ewin ]
6 Nov Re: Night photography [Chris Charles ]
6 Nov Re: One birder tackles the technology- TwitchathononTwitter ["michael norris" ]
6 Nov Re: Pay for Rare Bird Alert...surely not? [Alistair McKeough ]
6 Nov RE: Pay for Rare Bird Alert...surely not? [Simon Mustoe ]
6 Nov Night photography [Ákos Lumnitzer ]
6 Nov Re: Pay for Rare Bird Alert...surely not? [David Stowe ]
6 Nov RE: Pay for Rare Bird Alert...surely not? [Peter Shute ]
6 Nov RE: Re: Recording data [Peter Shute ]
06 Nov Re: Recording data []
6 Nov Re: Common-Uncommon-Rare [Dave Torr ]
6 Nov RE: Common-Uncommon-Rare ["Tim Dolby" ]
6 Nov Doth Feathers Maketh the Bird, or the Dinosaur? [Carl Clifford ]
6 Nov Common-Uncommon-Rare ["Pine Creek Pictures" ]
6 Nov Papua New Guinea visit Report No. 3 ["Pine Creek Pictures" ]
6 Nov Re: One birder tackles the technology- Twitchathon onTwitter [Alistair McKeough ]
6 Nov RE: One birder tackles the technology- Twitchathon onTwitter ["Tony Russell" ]
6 Nov Papua New Guinea Visit Report No. 3 ["Lisa & Dominic" ]
6 Nov Rare Bird Alert Website [Luke Shelley ]
06 Nov Birds Australia Rarities Committee website [Birds Australia Southern Queensland ]
6 Nov One birder tackles the technology- Twitchathon on Twitter ["Sean Dooley" ]
5 Nov Re: Rare Bird Alert Website [Gary Wright ]
5 Nov Re: Hall's Babbler Fowler's Gap ["Tim Dolby" ]
5 Nov rare bird alerts ["Pat OMalley" ]
5 Nov Tahiti Petrel and Black-bellied Stormie Photos [Simon Mustoe ]
5 Nov RE: Rare Bird Alerts Data Capture ["Tony Russell" ]
5 Nov RE: Rare Bird Alerts Data Capture [Simon Mustoe ]
5 Nov Re: Rare Bird Alerts Data Capture ["Rosemary Royle" ]
05 Nov Re: Rare Bird Alert Website [Ian May ]
5 Nov Hall's Babbler Fowler's Gap [Peter Waanders ]
05 Nov Black-bellied Storm Petrels off Sydney. ["Paul Walbridge" ]
5 Nov RE: BARC website ["Billinghurst, David (RTATECH)" ]
5 Nov Re: Satin-Leaden Flycatchers again [Rod Gardner ]
5 Nov RE: Rare Bird Alerts Data Capture [Simon Mustoe ]
5 Nov Re: BARC website [Alistair McKeough ]
04 Nov Re: [Birding-Aus] Australian Painted Snipe in Dubbo ["Colin R" ]
4 Nov BARC website [Alistair McKeough ]
5 Nov Re: Red-necked Crake etc. ["Alan Gillanders" ]
5 Nov Re: Rare Bird Alert Website [David Richardson ]
5 Nov Re: Rare Bird Alerts Data Capture [David Stowe ]
4 Nov Rare Bird Alerts Data Capture [Richard Baxter ]
5 Nov RE: Rare Bird Alert Website [Peter Shute ]
5 Nov RE: Rare Bird Alert Operator ["Tony Russell" ]
5 Nov RE: Rare Bird Alert Website ["Tony Russell" ]
5 Nov RE: [Birding-Aus] Australian Painted Snipe in Dubbo ["Tony Russell" ]
5 Nov Darwin, Little Grebe still present... ["Peter Kyne" ]
5 Nov Re: Pay for Rare Bird Alert...surely not? [David Stowe ]
5 Nov Rare Bird Alert Operator [Carl Clifford ]

Subject: RE: Re: Recording data
From: "Andrew Bell" <andrew AT bells.id.au>
Date: Sat, 7 Nov 2009 21:30:37 +0930
I recently purchased Bird Journal. It's very user friendly uses C&B as an
option  for Australian lists. It's main issue is that it is new and its
reports are a bit limited at present but they seem keen on feedback. Its
good as far as locations, and creating location specific lists but doesn't
do reports by site and date range together at present, so not so good for
multiday trip reports. I've goven them some suggestions for flexible
reporting and am waiting to see what the next update includes. 
It downloads into a format that can be uploaded to eBird. I have found I can
move lists from it to Eremaea but I have to do quite a fiddle with the CSV
file in excel to make it work.

Worth downloading the trial verion, I was soon hooked by its usability and
intuitiveness. 

Andrew Bell
Katherine 

-----Original Message-----
From: birding-aus-bounces AT vicnet.net.au
[mailto:birding-aus-bounces AT vicnet.net.au] On Behalf Of Ross Macfarlane
Sent: Saturday, 7 November 2009 11:05 AM
To: mandmyoung AT optusnet.com.au; birding-aus AT vicnet.net.au
Subject: Re: [Birding-Aus] Re: Recording data

Mark,

If you're using Excel and the steps you do to create a chart are always the
same, you could try recording the steps as a macro. It's pretty tricky &
advanced but if you are relatively computer literate it could be worth a
try. Effectively what happens is you create the charts once while having the
macro recording function switched on, and Excel records the steps. Save the
macro (you can give it a name) and next time you just execute the macro and
it runs all the sequential steps automatically on a new data set.

Ross Macfarlane

----- Original Message -----
From: 
To: 
Sent: Friday, November 06, 2009 1:43 PM
Subject: [Birding-Aus] Re: Recording data


> Hi Everyone.
>
> I'm just wondering if there is any specific software, or web application 
> that is available for recording trips, life lists, year lists etc?
> At the moment I use an MS Spreadsheet based on Christidis and Boles 2008 
> for my life list, year list, trips etc, but I find that it just doesn't 
> have the flexibility that I want from it.
>
> I'm looking for an application that will allow me to input data taken over

> a period of time, then to produce different graph reports. I want to have 
> different reports that will allow me to show how many species visit a 
> certain location over the period of a year, or how many of a particular 
> species was seen at a location over the period of a year, and other 
> similar type of reports.
>
> I can create reports within MS Access that will do the reporting the way 
> that I want it to, but I can't get it to print it out as a graph. And I 
> can create reports within MS Excel that will print out the report in a 
> graph, but the data entry is tedious and time consuming, because I can't 
> work out how to create a data entry template that captures the data for 
> the report. I have to input the data manually each time.
>
> I have been toying with the idea of creating a web-based application that 
> will allow me enter in data from trips (Species, age, sex, etc etc), then 
> prints out a report by location, species, age, sex etc, so that I can see 
> species specifics for a location over a given period. However, the 
> learning curve for that is more than my basic HTML editing skills can 
> handle.
>
> Any help is much appreciated.
>
> Regards,
> Mark
>
> 

===============================
www.birding-aus.org
birding-aus.blogspot.com

To unsubscribe from this mailing list, 
send the message:
unsubscribe 
(in the body of the message, with no Subject line)
to: birding-aus-request AT vicnet.net.au
===============================

===============================
www.birding-aus.org
birding-aus.blogspot.com

To unsubscribe from this mailing list, 
send the message:
unsubscribe 
(in the body of the message, with no Subject line)
to: birding-aus-request AT vicnet.net.au
===============================
Subject: The name keeps changing, but the saga continues...
From: Luke Shelley <ldshelle AT gmail.com>
Date: Sat, 7 Nov 2009 22:05:55 +1100
Simon,

Good approach - add to that a good understanding of 'usability' and I think
you have a winning formula. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Usability

I know that many of you are great birders, and there are some great web
skills and ideas too, but usability is severely lacking in just about
everything I see on the web (birding wise) at the moment.

Again, I am not here to just criticise, and I am not coming at this from the
angle of ideas that will benefit me - I am trying to present ideas that
benefit everyone. If anyone is genuinely interested in my opinion, please
email me directly.

-- 
Luke
===============================
www.birding-aus.org
birding-aus.blogspot.com

To unsubscribe from this mailing list, 
send the message:
unsubscribe 
(in the body of the message, with no Subject line)
to: birding-aus-request AT vicnet.net.au
===============================
Subject: Little Stint (South Drainage Lake, Woorinen VIC) follow up
From: Peter Lansley <bluenuthatch AT yahoo.com.au>
Date: Fri, 6 Nov 2009 18:20:29 -0800 (PST)
Hi all,

in response to my postings on the Little Stint on Eremaea (Birdline Victoria) & 

birding-aus, Peter Ewin wrote:


The assumption that the South Darinage Lake was what is called North Lake (of 
course) on Google I headed to Lake Road on the south side of the lake. Very few 

birds about with Masked Lapwing and Silver Gull definite and probably 
Red-capped 

Plover way off in the heat/salt haze. Maybe I had the wrong spot but it was 
worth 

the detour.


Unfortunately you had the wrong lake, Peter (you could have emailed me and I 
would 

happily have forwarded you the details). For the record, there are (at least) 
four lakes in the Woorinen complex situated 15 to 20 km northwest of Swan Hill, 
in 

north-western Victoria. Working from the Murray Valley Highway southwards we 
have, 

Highway Lake, South Drainage Lake, North Lake and Hollaway's Lake. So, South 
Drainage Lake is the one immediately south of White Road. The terminology I 
used for 

the northern two lakes that are not named in Google Earth, follows that used by 
the 

management authority for the lakes, Goulburn-Murray Water.

The Little Stint was at 722076mE, 6098459mN in zone 54 (WGS 84 datum) +/- 50 
metres 

using UTM co-ordinates (that is, 35deg13'56.5" 143deg26'25.2" using lat/longs. 
GDA 94 

datum is more or less the same (within 2 metres) as WGS 84 for hand held GPS. 
The site 

is just beyond the fence line going from the road at the northernmost point of 
the lake, south 

along the western shoreline.

I have now uploaded a cropped photo of the bird to Eremaea for those 
interested. 

There is no further information on whether or not the Little Stint is still 
there 

because we had to get back to Melbourne on Tuesday, and as far as I know, no 
other 

birders have since visited the site.

Cheers, Peter.



 
__________________________________________________________________________________ 

Win 1 of 4 Sony home entertainment packs thanks to Yahoo!7.
Enter now: http://au.docs.yahoo.com/homepageset/
==============================www.birding-aus.org
birding-aus.blogspot.com

To unsubscribe from this mailing list,
send the message:
unsubscribe
(in the body of the message, with no Subject line)
to: birding-aus-request AT vicnet.net.au
==============================
Subject: RE: Wildiaries versus Flickr
From: "Robert Inglis" <inglisrc AT tpg.com.au>
Date: Sat, 7 Nov 2009 23:45:19 +1000
I am having trouble with "Wildiaries" (very strange spelling).

If I 'Google' "wildiaries" (it took me a while to realise there is only one 
'd') the first choice I 

am presented with is a site with the URL
wildiaries.com/.
If I 'click' on the link to that site I reach a page titled "wildiaries 
wildiaries" (I do so hate 

the lack of capitalisation that is rife these days!).
What I see is one of the strangest web-pages I have ever seen.
There appears to be some 'links' at the top of the page but when I 'click' on 
one, e.g., 

"birds"...........nothing happens. Except there is a message at the bottom left 
of my screen saying 

"! error on page".

Obviously I am doing something wrong............but what?

Do I have to 'subscribe' to the site to be able to access the wonders being 
touted or am I 

using the wrong web-browser?
I use Internet Explorer 7.

However, if, for example, I click on the link provided to Chris Sanderson's 
Southport pelagic report 

(in a recent posting to BirdingAus) I go to a page obviously on the same 
web-site as the one 

mentioned above but containing the report and several medium quality photos.
The photos look like they are in a sort of gallery but it is not possible to 
simply view the photos 

in sequence as is the case in most on-line galleries I have encountered before. 
One has to return to 

the 'front page' after viewing each photo to select the next photo to be 
viewed. This can be a very 

time consuming and frustrating process......enough so that I don't think I have 
ever stayed around 

long enough to view a complete set of photos on any of the similar Wildiaries 
reports I have so far 

tried to view.

Once again, I may be doing something wrong............but what?

In its current iteration I don't think I would be interested in posting any 
trip reports on 

Wildiaries, sorry.

Cheers

Bob Inglis
Sandstone Point
Qld
Australia
http://users.tpg.com.au/inglisrc/


===============================
www.birding-aus.org
birding-aus.blogspot.com

To unsubscribe from this mailing list, 
send the message:
unsubscribe 
(in the body of the message, with no Subject line)
to: birding-aus-request AT vicnet.net.au
===============================
Subject: RE: Wildiaries versus Flickr
From: Simon Mustoe <simonmustoe AT hotmail.com>
Date: Sat, 7 Nov 2009 06:23:26 +0000
Dave,

No room on this forum for taking such suggestions badly...this is a very 
fruitful and informative discussion. Birding-aus has, in the last few months, 
reached a point of maturity and is providing some very important dialogue on 
peak birding matters. 


The only things I would say are:

1. There is no excuse these days for data being lost. Feeding data to a 
conservation group is a synch. However, backing up isn't always something that 
is done properly. 

2. It isn't always that east to give away data freely. In fact, trying to sell 
something 'free' is more difficult than you may imagine. I know it was many 
years before Eremaea's data started to be seen as something useful. 

3. Conservation groups are also ephemeral, but mostly in terms of funding. 
Occasional funding, however large, will always result in something that is 
great to start with but can easily flop later. In fact, the impetus to keep it 
up depends on the individuals who run it, so it's not that different to the 
'hobby' sites you refer to. 


For my part, a solid business plan, good understanding of social networking, 
and highly diverse potential is the key to success. I am quite excited about 
where all this might head in the next couple of years. 


Cheers,

Simon. 






Date: Sat, 7 Nov 2009 16:39:38 +1100
Subject: Re: [Birding-Aus] Wildiaries versus Flickr
From: davidtorr AT gmail.com
To: simonmustoe AT hotmail.com
CC: youcantryreachingme AT yahoo.com.au; birding-aus AT vicnet.net.au

A couple of further comments of a general nature which I hope Simon and others 
who run useful sites here will not take badly :-) I must confess that whilst I 
have looked at (but not contributed to) Wildiaries and Flickr I have never 
looked at Twitter or Facebook so that makes me extremely well qualified to 
comment? 




To a certain extent this is a classic case of the small company versus the 
large one. The small sites tend to be very responsive to requests for changes. 
I know that the owners of both Eremaea and Birdpedia (which has not really been 
included in the posts I have looked at but is another very useful site) have 
been very helpful when I have wanted to interface with them both for my own 
now-defunct site and for the BOCA site. I suspect that such a level of 
co-operation and willingness to modify their sites would not be forthcoming 
from the "big boys". This of course is primarily because all these small sites 
are being run (I suspect) mainly as a hobby and a service to the birding 
community - whereas the "big boys" run their sites to make money. 



This raises the second point - successful big sites are likely to continue for 
as long as they make money - and when they stop making money (or fail to start 
making money) are likely to disappear - there have been many examples of this 
over the brief life of the Internet and there will be many more in future. 
"Hobby" sites (and please do not take this as derogatory term) are likely to be 
run for as long as the owner has an interest and/or is capable of supporting 
the site. Hopefully the owners of such sites have some plans as to what will 
happen when this is no longer the case - I know that at least one of them has - 
otherwise we stand to lose as a birding community an awful lot of data when the 
inevitable happens. (Remember birders that whilst it is great to share your 
sightings, trip reports, photos etc. with others online, do not rely on such 
systems to hold your only copy of such information!) 



I guess the "best" option is the sites that are run by organisations such as BA 
and BOCA (vested interest in the latter one I must confess!) - these 
organisations have so far lasted a very long time and thus are less likely to 
disappear than either the "hobby" sites or the big commercial sites. But 
equally - with the exception of the Atlas/Birdata - they are probably not so 
innovative as the others! 





2009/11/7 Simon Mustoe 




Chris,



Wildiaries does all this. It is not as refined as Flickr, yet, but we're 
working on refining the image management and location user interface at the 
moment. The benefit over Flickr is that the site is devoted to wildlife and 
conservation and that we are tailoring it to your needs. In response to your 
points: 





<>  		 	   		  
_________________________________________________________________
Chat to your friends for free on selected mobiles

http://clk.atdmt.com/UKM/go/174426567/direct/01/==============================www.birding-aus.org 

birding-aus.blogspot.com

To unsubscribe from this mailing list,
send the message:
unsubscribe
(in the body of the message, with no Subject line)
to: birding-aus-request AT vicnet.net.au
==============================
Subject: Re: Wildiaries versus Flickr
From: Dave Torr <davidtorr AT gmail.com>
Date: Sat, 7 Nov 2009 16:39:38 +1100
A couple of further comments of a general nature which I hope Simon and
others who run useful sites here will not take badly :-) I must confess that
whilst I have looked at (but not contributed to) Wildiaries and Flickr I
have never looked at Twitter or Facebook so that makes me extremely well
qualified to comment?

To a certain extent this is a classic case of the small company versus the
large one. The small sites tend to be very responsive to requests for
changes. I know that the owners of both Eremaea and Birdpedia (which has not
really been included in the posts I have looked at but is another very
useful site) have been very helpful when I have wanted to interface with
them both for my own now-defunct site and for the BOCA site. I suspect that
such a level of co-operation and willingness to modify their sites would not
be forthcoming from the "big boys". This of course is primarily because all
these small sites are being run (I suspect) mainly as a hobby and a service
to the birding community - whereas the "big boys" run their sites to make
money.
This raises the second point - successful big sites are likely to continue
for as long as they make money - and when they stop making money (or fail to
start making money) are likely to disappear - there have been many examples
of this over the brief life of the Internet and there will be many more in
future. "Hobby" sites (and please do not take this as derogatory term) are
likely to be run for as long as the owner has an interest and/or is capable
of supporting the site. Hopefully the owners of such sites have some plans
as to what will happen when this is no longer the case - I know that at
least one of them has - otherwise we stand to lose as a birding community an
awful lot of data when the inevitable happens. (Remember birders that whilst
it is great to share your sightings, trip reports, photos etc. with others
online, do not rely on such systems to hold your only copy of such
information!)
I guess the "best" option is the sites that are run by organisations such as
BA and BOCA (vested interest in the latter one I must confess!) - these
organisations have so far lasted a very long time and thus are less likely
to disappear than either the "hobby" sites or the big commercial sites. But
equally - with the exception of the Atlas/Birdata - they are probably not so
innovative as the others!


2009/11/7 Simon Mustoe 

>
> Chris,
>
> Wildiaries does all this. It is not as refined as Flickr, yet, but we're
> working on refining the image management and location user interface at the
> moment. The benefit over Flickr is that the site is devoted to wildlife and
> conservation and that we are tailoring it to your needs. In response to your
> points:
>
> <>
===============================
www.birding-aus.org
birding-aus.blogspot.com

To unsubscribe from this mailing list, 
send the message:
unsubscribe 
(in the body of the message, with no Subject line)
to: birding-aus-request AT vicnet.net.au
===============================
Subject: RE: Hall's Babbler Fowler's Gap
From: "Jeff Davies" <jeff AT jeffdavies.com.au>
Date: Sat, 7 Nov 2009 13:42:06 +1100
G'day Tim,

Their residence at Gundabooka Nat Park is another 150 km closer to
Mootwingee than Brewarrina.

Cheers Jeff.



-----Original Message-----
From: birding-aus-bounces AT vicnet.net.au
[mailto:birding-aus-bounces AT vicnet.net.au] On Behalf Of Tim Dolby
Sent: Thursday, 5 November 2009 5:10 PM
To: Peter Waanders; Birding Aus
Subject: RE: [Birding-Aus] Hall's Babbler Fowler's Gap

Hi Peter, 

I'm not sure about Fowler's Gap Research Station, but they are found nearby
at Mutawintji (Mootwingee) National Park, 130 km nth of Broken Hill.
Restricted to the gorge systems of Mutawintji (such as Amphitheatre Gorge),
they are also present within the restricted northern area of the park. They
are also recorded recently around the township of Brewarrina, east of
Mutawintji.  

Hall's Babbler are listed in the 'Birds of the Milparinka District and
Cooper Creek Basin' (which is perhaps where you saw the reference to
Fowler's Gap?) by E Wyndham, Emu 78 (4) 179 - 187. 

Really interested to hear if any other records turn up Peter. 

Cheers, 

Tim Dolby

-----Original Message-----
From: birding-aus-bounces AT vicnet.net.au on behalf of Peter Waanders
Sent: Thu 11/5/2009 4:35 PM
To: Birding Aus
Subject: [Birding-Aus] Hall's Babbler Fowler's Gap
 
Hi birders,

I recently came across a mention of Hall's Babbler for the Fowlers Gap
Research Station in far-western NSW (north of Broken Hill). Does
anyone know if they're actually present at this location? Has anyone
been there?

cheers

Peter
==========www.birding-aus.org
birding-aus.blogspot.com

To unsubscribe from this mailing list, 
send the message:
unsubscribe 
(in the body of the message, with no Subject line)
to: birding-aus-request AT vicnet.net.au
==========



This email, including any attachment, is intended solely for the use of the
intended recipient. It is confidential and may contain personal information
or be subject to legal professional privilege. If you are not the intended
recipient any use, disclosure, reproduction or storage of it is
unauthorised. If you have received this email in error, please advise the
sender via return email and delete it from your system immediately. Victoria
University does not warrant that this email is free from viruses or defects
and accepts no liability for any damage caused by such viruses or defects.
==========www.birding-aus.org
birding-aus.blogspot.com

To unsubscribe from this mailing list, 
send the message:
unsubscribe 
(in the body of the message, with no Subject line)
to: birding-aus-request AT vicnet.net.au
===========

===============================
www.birding-aus.org
birding-aus.blogspot.com

To unsubscribe from this mailing list, 
send the message:
unsubscribe 
(in the body of the message, with no Subject line)
to: birding-aus-request AT vicnet.net.au
===============================
Subject: Re: Hall's Babbler Fowler's Gap
From: "Chris Brandis" <cbrandis AT speedlink.com.au>
Date: Thu, 5 Nov 2009 19:39:54 +1100
Hi Peter
They are at Mutawintji NP, about 50 km to the east, and we saw them where 
the road from White Cliffs meets the Silver City Hwy about 150 Km to the 
north.
Cheers  Chris.

----- Original Message ----- 
From: "Peter Waanders" 
To: "Birding Aus" 
Sent: Thursday, November 05, 2009 4:35 PM
Subject: [Birding-Aus] Hall's Babbler Fowler's Gap


Hi birders,

I recently came across a mention of Hall's Babbler for the Fowlers Gap
Research Station in far-western NSW (north of Broken Hill). Does
anyone know if they're actually present at this location? Has anyone
been there?

cheers

Peter
==========www.birding-aus.org
birding-aus.blogspot.com

To unsubscribe from this mailing list,
send the message:
unsubscribe
(in the body of the message, with no Subject line)
to: birding-aus-request AT vicnet.net.au
==========



===============================
www.birding-aus.org
birding-aus.blogspot.com

To unsubscribe from this mailing list, 
send the message:
unsubscribe 
(in the body of the message, with no Subject line)
to: birding-aus-request AT vicnet.net.au
===============================
Subject: RE: Hall's Babbler Fowler's Gap
From: "Tim Dolby" <Tim.Dolby AT vu.edu.au>
Date: Thu, 5 Nov 2009 17:09:40 +1100
Hi Peter, 

I'm not sure about Fowler's Gap Research Station, but they are found nearby at 
Mutawintji (Mootwingee) National Park, 130 km nth of Broken Hill. Restricted to 
the gorge systems of Mutawintji (such as Amphitheatre Gorge), they are also 
present within the restricted northern area of the park. They are also recorded 
recently around the township of Brewarrina, east of Mutawintji. 


Hall's Babbler are listed in the 'Birds of the Milparinka District and Cooper 
Creek Basin' (which is perhaps where you saw the reference to Fowler's Gap?) by 
E Wyndham, Emu 78 (4) 179 - 187. 


Really interested to hear if any other records turn up Peter. 

Cheers, 

Tim Dolby

-----Original Message-----
From: birding-aus-bounces AT vicnet.net.au on behalf of Peter Waanders
Sent: Thu 11/5/2009 4:35 PM
To: Birding Aus
Subject: [Birding-Aus] Hall's Babbler Fowler's Gap
 
Hi birders,

I recently came across a mention of Hall's Babbler for the Fowlers Gap
Research Station in far-western NSW (north of Broken Hill). Does
anyone know if they're actually present at this location? Has anyone
been there?

cheers

Peter
==========www.birding-aus.org
birding-aus.blogspot.com

To unsubscribe from this mailing list, 
send the message:
unsubscribe 
(in the body of the message, with no Subject line)
to: birding-aus-request AT vicnet.net.au
==========



This email, including any attachment, is intended solely for the use of the 
intended recipient. It is confidential and may contain personal information or 
be subject to legal professional privilege. If you are not the intended 
recipient any use, disclosure, reproduction or storage of it is unauthorised. 
If you have received this email in error, please advise the sender via return 
email and delete it from your system immediately. Victoria University does not 
warrant that this email is free from viruses or defects and accepts no 
liability for any damage caused by such viruses or defects. 

==============================www.birding-aus.org
birding-aus.blogspot.com

To unsubscribe from this mailing list,
send the message:
unsubscribe
(in the body of the message, with no Subject line)
to: birding-aus-request AT vicnet.net.au
==============================
Subject: Re: Satin-Leaden Flycatchers again
From: "Graham Turner" <origma AT ozemail.com.au>
Date: Thu, 5 Nov 2009 16:53:25 +1100
In my experience there are many calls in common but the Satin does an 
'eee-cheuuu' call that the Leaden does not. (This call is similar to one 
that the white-naped Honeyeater does, if that's of help to anyone, though 
this honeyeater has a very large range of calls).

Has anyone else found this?

Cheers
Graham Turner

----- Original Message ----- 
From: "Rod Gardner" 
To: "Allan Richardson" 
Cc: 
Sent: Thursday, November 05, 2009 2:53 PM
Subject: Re: [Birding-Aus] Satin-Leaden Flycatchers again


> Hi Allan,
>
> Thanks, Allan. It's good to hear from someone who has been trying to work
> out if you can split these two on calls. Your answer is pretty much what I
> suspected - that it's extremely difficult because of the variation in the
> calls of LF (I wouldn't know about SF). One question this raises, though,
> is whether the BOCA calls are reliable. As I said in my original posting,
> the call I heard at Anstead was almost identical to the first call for SF
> on the BOCA recordings. I don't doubt that that recording is of a SF, but
> does anyone know if LF might produce the same call?
>
> Rod
>
>
>
>
>
> From:
> "Allan Richardson" 
> To:
> , "Rod Gardner" 
> Date:
> 04/11/09 09:18 PM
> Subject:
> Re: [Birding-Aus] Satin-Leaden Flycatchers again
>
>
>
> Hi Rod
>
> In recent years I've been pretty keen to test the calls of SF compared
> with
> LF. And over the past few seasons have tracked down many a variation on
> the
> LF call suspecting that a SF would show itself, only to find LF.  A week
> ago
> I was working on the Newnes Plateau in the western Blue Mountains and
> encountered LF regularly, most deviating from the calls that I am used to
> hearing on the Central Coast where I live. The last flycatcher call I
> encountered during the week sounded very much like a LF, but turned out to
>
> be a SF. I have heard SF in the past, which sounded different to LF calls,
>
> but I suspect, from my own experiences, that the variation of call within
> each species may make it hard to draw some general rules of thumb here.
>
> Regards
>
> Allan Richardson
>
>
> ----- Original Message ----- 
> From: "Rod Gardner" 
> To: 
> Sent: Thursday, October 29, 2009 11:14 AM
> Subject: [Birding-Aus] Satin-Leaden Flycatchers again
>
>
>> Following up on the Leaden/Satin Flycatcher thread, I have another
>> question about these birds. Leaden Flycatchers are common on my local
>> patch in the west of Brisbane, and I’m familiar with their calls.
> Recently
>> I heard a call that was Leaden Flycatcher-like, but not one I’d heard
>> before. I didn’t get to see the bird, as it was in a densely vegetated
>> gully, but recorded the call on a digital voice recorder. When I got
> home
>> and checked it with the BOCA recordings, it was pretty much identical to
>> the first calls of the Satin Flycatcher on those tapes. However,
> according
>> to HANZAB, the calls of LFs and SFs are very similar, with lots of
>> individual variation, and it says they are separable only with practice.
>> Can anyone say whether that first Satin call on the BOCA tapes is
>> diagnostic?
>>
>
>
> 
-------------------------------------------------------------------------------- 

>
>
>> ===============================
>> www.birding-aus.org
>> birding-aus.blogspot.com
>>
>> To unsubscribe from this mailing list,
>> send the message:
>> unsubscribe
>> (in the body of the message, with no Subject line)
>> to: birding-aus-request AT vicnet.net.au
>> ===============================
>
>
>
>
>



-------------------------------------------------------------------------------- 



> ===============================
> www.birding-aus.org
> birding-aus.blogspot.com
>
> To unsubscribe from this mailing list,
> send the message:
> unsubscribe
> (in the body of the message, with no Subject line)
> to: birding-aus-request AT vicnet.net.au
> =============================== 

===============================
www.birding-aus.org
birding-aus.blogspot.com

To unsubscribe from this mailing list, 
send the message:
unsubscribe 
(in the body of the message, with no Subject line)
to: birding-aus-request AT vicnet.net.au
===============================
Subject: Re: Re: Recording data
From: "Ross Macfarlane" <rmacfarl AT alphalink.com.au>
Date: Sat, 7 Nov 2009 12:34:45 +1100
Mark,

If you're using Excel and the steps you do to create a chart are always the 
same, you could try recording the steps as a macro. It's pretty tricky & 
advanced but if you are relatively computer literate it could be worth a 
try. Effectively what happens is you create the charts once while having the 
macro recording function switched on, and Excel records the steps. Save the 
macro (you can give it a name) and next time you just execute the macro and 
it runs all the sequential steps automatically on a new data set.

Ross Macfarlane

----- Original Message ----- 
From: 
To: 
Sent: Friday, November 06, 2009 1:43 PM
Subject: [Birding-Aus] Re: Recording data


> Hi Everyone.
>
> I'm just wondering if there is any specific software, or web application 
> that is available for recording trips, life lists, year lists etc?
> At the moment I use an MS Spreadsheet based on Christidis and Boles 2008 
> for my life list, year list, trips etc, but I find that it just doesn't 
> have the flexibility that I want from it.
>
> I'm looking for an application that will allow me to input data taken over 
> a period of time, then to produce different graph reports. I want to have 
> different reports that will allow me to show how many species visit a 
> certain location over the period of a year, or how many of a particular 
> species was seen at a location over the period of a year, and other 
> similar type of reports.
>
> I can create reports within MS Access that will do the reporting the way 
> that I want it to, but I can't get it to print it out as a graph. And I 
> can create reports within MS Excel that will print out the report in a 
> graph, but the data entry is tedious and time consuming, because I can't 
> work out how to create a data entry template that captures the data for 
> the report. I have to input the data manually each time.
>
> I have been toying with the idea of creating a web-based application that 
> will allow me enter in data from trips (Species, age, sex, etc etc), then 
> prints out a report by location, species, age, sex etc, so that I can see 
> species specifics for a location over a given period. However, the 
> learning curve for that is more than my basic HTML editing skills can 
> handle.
>
> Any help is much appreciated.
>
> Regards,
> Mark
>
> 

===============================
www.birding-aus.org
birding-aus.blogspot.com

To unsubscribe from this mailing list, 
send the message:
unsubscribe 
(in the body of the message, with no Subject line)
to: birding-aus-request AT vicnet.net.au
===============================
Subject: RE: Wildiaries versus Flickr
From: Simon Mustoe <simonmustoe AT hotmail.com>
Date: Fri, 6 Nov 2009 23:33:53 +0000
Chris,

Wildiaries does all this. It is not as refined as Flickr, yet, but we're 
working on refining the image management and location user interface at the 
moment. The benefit over Flickr is that the site is devoted to wildlife and 
conservation and that we are tailoring it to your needs. In response to your 
points: 


FLICKR In sets: you could, for example, have a set for "2009" and another
for "Raptors" and another for "Central Australia". You can then put a
single photo into multiple sets.

WILDIARIES You can create photo galleries within photos galleries - 
http://wildiaries.com/users/75-Odonutter/gallery_types/custom/galleries/3/pictures. 
You can add images to galleries when you tag photos in a trip - note, the 
current image tagging functionality is being replaced with a much simpler 
Java-based image tagging tool next week some time, which will enable multiple 
species tagging. You can also individually tag and manage images later. 


FLICKR Using tags: further, you can
add tags, or keywords to your photos. Obvious ones are the species
name, but many of the "field guide" groups that exist go right up
through genus, family, order, etc. Want to search for all your records
for a given species? search for the tags.

WILDIARIES It allows you to tag by species, gender, latitude / longitude, 
caption (tags can be added here, comma separated) are all added to images. 
Images are auto-tagged to trip and user. It automatically generates species 
pages in your diary (see mine here: 
http://wildiaries.com/users/75-Odonutter/gallery_types/species/galleries). 
Note, this is my page for all my overall Wildiaries sites - I am a member of 
multiple ones, so I have diaries for herps, birds, mammals, dragonflies and 
butterflies. This way, I can track everything at once. This is my birding 
diary: http://aussiebirding.wildiaries.com/users/75-Odonutter. 

I also have one for my world marine trips. I can create a Wildiaries site for 
any group of animals anywhere in the world...just ask! 


FLICKR Using groups: if several of you join a single group and submit
 all your records to the one group, you'll quickly get a big picture

WILDIARIES It allows users to collaborate on trip reports. Multiple people can 
write the text and upload images for one trip. Here is an example that Chris 
Sanderson and I did: http://aussiebirding.wildiaries.com/trips/142. There is no 
limit. A tour group can, for example, create a trip and have clients generate 
the content. 


FLICKR Geographic location: this is the killer - you can browse maps of the
world and drag your photos to the location you took them. You can also
browse maps and say "show me all records for the map that's currently
on my screen"

WILDIARIES You type a lat and lon / browse Google Maps and then upload your 
photos to there. In due course, we'll read image meta data. This will let us 
take the lat and lon from your images directly (if you have a GPS-enabled 
camera). I agree, drag and drop is really good. We don't have this at the 
moment but it is on the 'to do' list. 




This is a very useful post for me though. It reflects some of the comments from 
others, so we have a list of items to work on. However, there are a heap of 
other things we can do as well (which Flickr can't / won't). Flickr, like a lot 
of large non-niche websites are not designed to do wildlife social networking. 
I go back to my original comment - the tools out there do some, but not all of 
the things, that wildlife enthusiasts want. 


...Keep in touch. I am always interested in hearing more.

Simon.



Date: Fri, 6 Nov 2009 15:09:15 -0800
From: youcantryreachingme AT yahoo.com.au
Subject: Re: [Birding-Aus] Twitter Problems
To: simonmustoe AT hotmail.com
CC: birding-aus AT vicnet.net.au



For what it's worth, Twitter is planning to allow users to access all past 
messages (making it no longer ephemeral). 


In my opinion, social networking sites like Twitter and Facebook can be good 
for posting out announcements because people are using such sites as a "one 
stop shop" for getting updates from sources they value. 


RSS feeds are similar in the sense that if I run my own website with a "what's 
new" column and make the news feed available via RSS, then others could grab 
that feed, along with feeds of other items of interest. The difference here is 
that "my own website" should retain an archive of information long into the 
future (which is good) but setting up RSS feeds is that much more tedious for 
your audience (in comparison, say, to following someone on Twitter), 

 which is bad.

How's this for a suggestion? Use Flickr.

Why? You might not even have a photo of your bird. Because with flickr you can 
organise your photos in many useful ways. (Instead of a photo, just use a dummy 
image - or take a camera with you and when you see a species, write it down, 
and the number sighted, and photograph the words - this is important, because 
the photo will give you a date and timestamp). 


* In sets: you could, for example, have a set for "2009" and another for 
"Raptors" and another for "Central Australia". You can then put a single photo 
into multiple sets. 


* Using tags: further, you can add tags, or keywords to your photos. Obvious 
ones are the species name, but many of the "field guide" groups that exist go 
right up through genus, family, order, etc. Want to search for all your records 
for a given species? search for the tags. 


* Using groups: if several of you join a single group and submit
 all your records to the one group, you'll quickly get a big picture

* Geographic location: this is the killer - you can browse maps of the world 
and drag your photos to the location you took them. You can also browse maps 
and say "show me all records for the map that's currently on my screen" 


I track sightings records for Tasmanian tigers and have used Google Earth to do 
so. That's fine for presenting a bit of a tour, but in order to make the data 
really searchable you need to be able to come to each record by different 
means, not just location. For example, using tags, sets and the map you could 
answer the question "which species did I see with Birdwatch Group X in the 
Royal National Park in 2006?" 


(PS, of course, each photo - or sighting record - can have a title and 
description too). 


Chris.
 
From: Simon Mustoe 
To: birding-aus AT vicnet.net.au
Sent: Sat, 7 November, 2009 9:13:58 AM
Subject: [Birding-Aus] Twitter Problems


Hi,

Understanding which social networking tools to use, is a big hurdle for most 
people. Let's take Twitter as an example. Rampant use of TwitterFeed is 
starting to dilute the value of what could be a very useful tool for birding. 
TwitterFeed takes the posts from a website and then automatically feeds them 
out via Twitter. Then just imagine, another person can take a feed this 
TwitterFeed and feed it out again, and so on. 


With respect to Russell (sorry Russell, I hope you don't mind
 this public opinion, but it's important), I noticed that this is how the 
birdline twitter sites are done...the problem is, that it doesn't actually 
work...I get the message 'too many tweets' and I can't access content. You can 
imagine that the ultimate benefit will be lost. The basic fact is that you can 
see this content just by visiting the Eremaea site, so why bother? Secondly, 
twitter is ephemeral. There will be no permanent record of the information 
gathered. If I recall, something like 2 months until messages drop off into the 
ether. 


Twitter is about immediate promotion to the world. It is not the right tool for 
automatically syndicating content and it is not the right tool if we have any 
interest in using posts to generate sightings information. 


For many of the social networking tools (Twitter, Facebook etc) there are too 
many negatives that, in my view, outweigh the benefits that would be needed for 
a sustainable system FOR 

 CONSERVATION and BIRDING (let's face it, there is no point in doing this if 
this isn't the main objective). 


Here is a bit of information that may help people understand more about where 
to put their information. Note, all the tools for birding are there already. 
Use them wisely and draw on their strengths. 


A few rules of engagement:

Your personal website is more important than any other. However, be realistic, 
your website will never reach its full potential unless you SHARE. Make sure 
you track your website using Google Analytics (easy to set up). 

Place all your information on your own website, (or the free one that best 
suits your needs), but promote yourself widely using the range of available 
networking tools (see below). Don't be shy...the true value of your content is 
when it is seen by lots of others, not just by you. 

Understand the strengths and purpose of the different networking tools (see 
below). ONLY use them 

 for the purpose that they were designed.Do not be tempted to do too much. 
Sending every message to all the twitter feeds, every discussion forum etc will 
be a waste of your time and may annoy others. Post content that is relevant and 
interesting.Make sure you link to content that is 'rich'. There should ideally 
be some depth and supporting information to your content.For more information, 
see http://blog.wildiaries.com 


HOW THE DIFFERENT BIRDING SITES WORK
---------------------------------------------------

BIRDLINE AUSTRALIA / EREMAEA (Web) - run by Richard and Margaret Alcorn. Use 
this to submit information about rarities. Access their pages here: 
http://www.eremaea.com/BirdlineRecentSightings.aspx?Birdline=6 


FORUMS (DISCUSSION) - BirdingOz - Craig Miller's site, aimed at raising
 the profile of Australia's birding photographers. Very useful thread-based 
discussion forum, distinctly different from Birding-Aus. It caters for lots of 
select groups, wanting to discuss particular issues in small sub-forums. 
http://www.birdingoz.com.au/ 


FORUMS (LISTSERVER) - Birding-Aus - A one-stop-shop place for reaching the 
majority of mainstream birders in Australia, in one hit. Copy information of 
great relevance to the ENTIRE birding community here. Anything that you post to 
BirdingOz or Eremaea could end up here. Make use of links, so you can send 
people, if necessary, back to your rich content. 


TRIP REPORTS (BIRDING DIARY) - Wildiaries - Designed so you can keep a diary of 
your activities over time and provide rich content. Post your best images along 
with text from your trips. Because images and sightings are associated with 
locations, it provides a lasting record of 

 birding activity and contributes to a growing database of information about 
Australian species. Links directly back to your own website. You can even embed 
your trips in your blog / website using iframe (like embedding a YouTube 
video). 


Regards,

Simon.

                           
_________________________________________________________________
New Windows 7: Simplify what you do everyday. Find the right PC for you.

http://www.microsoft.com/uk/windows/buy/==============================www.birding-aus.org 

birding-aus.blogspot.com

To unsubscribe from this mailing list,
send the message:
unsubscribe
(in the body of the message, with no Subject line)
to: birding-aus-request AT vicnet.net.au
==============================






      
Get more done like never before with Yahoo!7 Mail.  Learn more. 		 	   		  
_________________________________________________________________
New Windows 7: Find the right PC for you. Learn more.

http://www.microsoft.com/uk/windows/buy/==============================www.birding-aus.org 

birding-aus.blogspot.com

To unsubscribe from this mailing list,
send the message:
unsubscribe
(in the body of the message, with no Subject line)
to: birding-aus-request AT vicnet.net.au
==============================
Subject: Re: Twitter Problems
From: Chris <youcantryreachingme AT yahoo.com.au>
Date: Fri, 6 Nov 2009 15:17:56 -0800 (PST)
For a practical example of Flickr,

here is a photo of Saiphos equalis - the three-toed skink - which I took in 
Peakhurst : http://www.flickr.com/photos/youcantryreachingme/3941612252/ 


At a glance you can see:

* my photostream (all my photos in the order uploaded - like a news feed)
* Australian Wildlife set
* Lizards set
* It's in the Oatley Park and Hurstville Bushland group
* The tags: "three-toed skink", skink, lizard, saiphos and equalis
* It was taken in Peakhurst Heights, Sydney, and you can click through to the 
map 

* Comments and description.

If you click the map link you get further links to "see nearby photos and 
video" and "go to the map" which will show you all my items from that area. 


Chris.




________________________________
From: Chris 
To: Simon Mustoe 
Cc: Birding Aus 
Sent: Sat, 7 November, 2009 10:09:15 AM
Subject: Re: [Birding-Aus] Twitter Problems

For what it's worth, Twitter is planning to allow users to access all past 
messages (making it no longer ephemeral). 


In my opinion, social networking sites like Twitter and Facebook can be good 
for posting out announcements because people are using such sites as a "one 
stop shop" for getting updates from sources they value. 


RSS feeds are similar in the sense that if I run my own website with a "what's 
new" column and make the news feed available via RSS, then others could grab 
that feed, along with feeds of other items of interest. The difference here is 
that "my own website" should retain an archive of information long into the 
future (which is good) but setting up RSS feeds is that much more tedious for 
your audience (in comparison, say, to following someone on Twitter), which is 
bad. 


How's this for a suggestion? Use Flickr.

Why? You might not even have a photo of your bird. Because with flickr you can 
organise your photos in many useful ways. (Instead of a photo, just use a dummy 
image - or take a camera with you and when you see a species, write it down, 
and the number sighted, and photograph the words - this is important, because 
the photo will give you a date and timestamp). 


* In sets: you could, for example, have a set for "2009" and another for 
"Raptors" and another for "Central Australia". You can then put a single photo 
into multiple sets. 


* Using tags: further, you can add tags, or keywords to your photos. Obvious 
ones are the species name, but many of the "field guide" groups that exist go 
right up through genus, family, order, etc. Want to search for all your records 
for a given species? search for the tags. 


* Using groups: if several of you join a single group and submit all your 
records to the one group, you'll quickly get a big picture 


* Geographic location: this is the killer - you can browse maps of the world 
and drag your photos to the location you took them. You can also browse maps 
and say "show me all records for the map that's currently on my screen" 


I track sightings records for Tasmanian tigers and have used Google Earth to do 
so. That's fine for presenting a bit of a tour, but in order to make the data 
really searchable you need to be able to come to each record by different 
means, not just location. For example, using tags, sets and the map you could 
answer the question "which species did I see with Birdwatch Group X in the 
Royal National Park in 2006?" 


(PS, of course, each photo - or sighting record - can have a title and 
description too). 


Chris.




________________________________
From: Simon Mustoe 
To: birding-aus AT vicnet.net.au
Sent: Sat, 7 November, 2009 9:13:58 AM
Subject: [Birding-Aus] Twitter Problems


Hi,

Understanding which social networking tools to use, is a big hurdle for most 
people. Let's take Twitter as an example. Rampant use of TwitterFeed is 
starting to dilute the value of what could be a very useful tool for birding. 
TwitterFeed takes the posts from a website and then automatically feeds them 
out via Twitter. Then just imagine, another person can take a feed this 
TwitterFeed and feed it out again, and so on. 


With respect to Russell (sorry Russell, I hope you don't mind this public 
opinion, but it's important), I noticed that this is how the birdline twitter 
sites are done...the problem is, that it doesn't actually work...I get the 
message 'too many tweets' and I can't access content. You can imagine that the 
ultimate benefit will be lost. The basic fact is that you can see this content 
just by visiting the Eremaea site, so why bother? Secondly, twitter is 
ephemeral. There will be no permanent record of the information gathered. If I 
recall, something like 2 months until messages drop off into the ether. 


Twitter is about immediate promotion to the world. It is not the right tool for 
automatically syndicating content and it is not the right tool if we have any 
interest in using posts to generate sightings information. 


For many of the social networking tools (Twitter, Facebook etc) there are too 
many negatives that, in my view, outweigh the benefits that would be needed for 
a sustainable system FOR CONSERVATION and BIRDING (let's face it, there is no 
point in doing this if this isn't the main objective). 


Here is a bit of information that may help people understand more about where 
to put their information. Note, all the tools for birding are there already. 
Use them wisely and draw on their strengths. 


A few rules of engagement:

Your personal website is more important than any other. However, be realistic, 
your website will never reach its full potential unless you SHARE. Make sure 
you track your website using Google Analytics (easy to set up). 

Place all your information on your own website, (or the free one that best 
suits your needs), but promote yourself widely using the range of available 
networking tools (see below). Don't be shy...the true value of your content is 
when it is seen by lots of others, not just by you. 

Understand the strengths and purpose of the different networking tools (see 
below). ONLY use them for the purpose that they were designed.Do not be tempted 
to do too much. Sending every message to all the twitter feeds, every 
discussion forum etc will be a waste of your time and may annoy others. Post 
content that is relevant and interesting.Make sure you link to content that is 
'rich'. There should ideally be some depth and supporting information to your 
content.For more information, see http://blog.wildiaries.com 


HOW THE DIFFERENT BIRDING SITES WORK
---------------------------------------------------

BIRDLINE AUSTRALIA / EREMAEA (Web) - run by Richard and Margaret Alcorn. Use 
this to submit information about rarities. Access their pages here: 
http://www.eremaea.com/BirdlineRecentSightings.aspx?Birdline=6 


FORUMS (DISCUSSION) - BirdingOz - Craig Miller's site, aimed at raising the 
profile of Australia's birding photographers. Very useful thread-based 
discussion forum, distinctly different from Birding-Aus. It caters for lots of 
select groups, wanting to discuss particular issues in small sub-forums. 
http://www.birdingoz.com.au/ 


FORUMS (LISTSERVER) - Birding-Aus - A one-stop-shop place for reaching the 
majority of mainstream birders in Australia, in one hit. Copy information of 
great relevance to the ENTIRE birding community here. Anything that you post to 
BirdingOz or Eremaea could end up here. Make use of links, so you can send 
people, if necessary, back to your rich content. 


TRIP REPORTS (BIRDING DIARY) - Wildiaries - Designed so you can keep a diary of 
your activities over time and provide rich content. Post your best images along 
with text from your trips. Because images and sightings are associated with 
locations, it provides a lasting record of birding activity and contributes to 
a growing database of information about Australian species. Links directly back 
to your own website. You can even embed your trips in your blog / website using 
iframe (like embedding a YouTube video). 


Regards,

Simon.

                          
_________________________________________________________________
New Windows 7: Simplify what you do everyday. Find the right PC for you.

http://www.microsoft.com/uk/windows/buy/==============================www.birding-aus.org 

birding-aus.blogspot.com

To unsubscribe from this mailing list,
send the message:
unsubscribe
(in the body of the message, with no Subject line)
to: birding-aus-request AT vicnet.net.au
==============================


 
__________________________________________________________________________________ 

Get more done like never before with Yahoo!7 Mail.
Learn more: http://au.overview.mail.yahoo.com/
==============================www.birding-aus.org
birding-aus.blogspot.com

To unsubscribe from this mailing list,
send the message:
unsubscribe
(in the body of the message, with no Subject line)
to: birding-aus-request AT vicnet.net.au
==============================


 
__________________________________________________________________________________ 

Get more done like never before with Yahoo!7 Mail.
Learn more: http://au.overview.mail.yahoo.com/
==============================www.birding-aus.org
birding-aus.blogspot.com

To unsubscribe from this mailing list,
send the message:
unsubscribe
(in the body of the message, with no Subject line)
to: birding-aus-request AT vicnet.net.au
==============================
Subject: Re: Twitter Problems
From: Chris <youcantryreachingme AT yahoo.com.au>
Date: Fri, 6 Nov 2009 15:09:15 -0800 (PST)
For what it's worth, Twitter is planning to allow users to access all past 
messages (making it no longer ephemeral). 


In my opinion, social networking sites like Twitter and Facebook can be good 
for posting out announcements because people are using such sites as a "one 
stop shop" for getting updates from sources they value. 


RSS feeds are similar in the sense that if I run my own website with a "what's 
new" column and make the news feed available via RSS, then others could grab 
that feed, along with feeds of other items of interest. The difference here is 
that "my own website" should retain an archive of information long into the 
future (which is good) but setting up RSS feeds is that much more tedious for 
your audience (in comparison, say, to following someone on Twitter), which is 
bad. 


How's this for a suggestion? Use Flickr.

Why? You might not even have a photo of your bird. Because with flickr you can 
organise your photos in many useful ways. (Instead of a photo, just use a dummy 
image - or take a camera with you and when you see a species, write it down, 
and the number sighted, and photograph the words - this is important, because 
the photo will give you a date and timestamp). 


* In sets: you could, for example, have a set for "2009" and another for 
"Raptors" and another for "Central Australia". You can then put a single photo 
into multiple sets. 


* Using tags: further, you can add tags, or keywords to your photos. Obvious 
ones are the species name, but many of the "field guide" groups that exist go 
right up through genus, family, order, etc. Want to search for all your records 
for a given species? search for the tags. 


* Using groups: if several of you join a single group and submit all your 
records to the one group, you'll quickly get a big picture 


* Geographic location: this is the killer - you can browse maps of the world 
and drag your photos to the location you took them. You can also browse maps 
and say "show me all records for the map that's currently on my screen" 


I track sightings records for Tasmanian tigers and have used Google Earth to do 
so. That's fine for presenting a bit of a tour, but in order to make the data 
really searchable you need to be able to come to each record by different 
means, not just location. For example, using tags, sets and the map you could 
answer the question "which species did I see with Birdwatch Group X in the 
Royal National Park in 2006?" 


(PS, of course, each photo - or sighting record - can have a title and 
description too). 


Chris.




________________________________
From: Simon Mustoe 
To: birding-aus AT vicnet.net.au
Sent: Sat, 7 November, 2009 9:13:58 AM
Subject: [Birding-Aus] Twitter Problems


Hi,

Understanding which social networking tools to use, is a big hurdle for most 
people. Let's take Twitter as an example. Rampant use of TwitterFeed is 
starting to dilute the value of what could be a very useful tool for birding. 
TwitterFeed takes the posts from a website and then automatically feeds them 
out via Twitter. Then just imagine, another person can take a feed this 
TwitterFeed and feed it out again, and so on. 


With respect to Russell (sorry Russell, I hope you don't mind this public 
opinion, but it's important), I noticed that this is how the birdline twitter 
sites are done...the problem is, that it doesn't actually work...I get the 
message 'too many tweets' and I can't access content. You can imagine that the 
ultimate benefit will be lost. The basic fact is that you can see this content 
just by visiting the Eremaea site, so why bother? Secondly, twitter is 
ephemeral. There will be no permanent record of the information gathered. If I 
recall, something like 2 months until messages drop off into the ether. 


Twitter is about immediate promotion to the world. It is not the right tool for 
automatically syndicating content and it is not the right tool if we have any 
interest in using posts to generate sightings information. 


For many of the social networking tools (Twitter, Facebook etc) there are too 
many negatives that, in my view, outweigh the benefits that would be needed for 
a sustainable system FOR CONSERVATION and BIRDING (let's face it, there is no 
point in doing this if this isn't the main objective). 


Here is a bit of information that may help people understand more about where 
to put their information. Note, all the tools for birding are there already. 
Use them wisely and draw on their strengths. 


A few rules of engagement:

Your personal website is more important than any other. However, be realistic, 
your website will never reach its full potential unless you SHARE. Make sure 
you track your website using Google Analytics (easy to set up). 

Place all your information on your own website, (or the free one that best 
suits your needs), but promote yourself widely using the range of available 
networking tools (see below). Don't be shy...the true value of your content is 
when it is seen by lots of others, not just by you. 

Understand the strengths and purpose of the different networking tools (see 
below). ONLY use them for the purpose that they were designed.Do not be tempted 
to do too much. Sending every message to all the twitter feeds, every 
discussion forum etc will be a waste of your time and may annoy others. Post 
content that is relevant and interesting.Make sure you link to content that is 
'rich'. There should ideally be some depth and supporting information to your 
content.For more information, see http://blog.wildiaries.com 


HOW THE DIFFERENT BIRDING SITES WORK
---------------------------------------------------

BIRDLINE AUSTRALIA / EREMAEA (Web) - run by Richard and Margaret Alcorn. Use 
this to submit information about rarities. Access their pages here: 
http://www.eremaea.com/BirdlineRecentSightings.aspx?Birdline=6 


FORUMS (DISCUSSION) - BirdingOz - Craig Miller's site, aimed at raising the 
profile of Australia's birding photographers. Very useful thread-based 
discussion forum, distinctly different from Birding-Aus. It caters for lots of 
select groups, wanting to discuss particular issues in small sub-forums. 
http://www.birdingoz.com.au/ 


FORUMS (LISTSERVER) - Birding-Aus - A one-stop-shop place for reaching the 
majority of mainstream birders in Australia, in one hit. Copy information of 
great relevance to the ENTIRE birding community here. Anything that you post to 
BirdingOz or Eremaea could end up here. Make use of links, so you can send 
people, if necessary, back to your rich content. 


TRIP REPORTS (BIRDING DIARY) - Wildiaries - Designed so you can keep a diary of 
your activities over time and provide rich content. Post your best images along 
with text from your trips. Because images and sightings are associated with 
locations, it provides a lasting record of birding activity and contributes to 
a growing database of information about Australian species. Links directly back 
to your own website. You can even embed your trips in your blog / website using 
iframe (like embedding a YouTube video). 


Regards,

Simon.

                          
_________________________________________________________________
New Windows 7: Simplify what you do everyday. Find the right PC for you.

http://www.microsoft.com/uk/windows/buy/==============================www.birding-aus.org 

birding-aus.blogspot.com

To unsubscribe from this mailing list,
send the message:
unsubscribe
(in the body of the message, with no Subject line)
to: birding-aus-request AT vicnet.net.au
==============================


 
__________________________________________________________________________________ 

Get more done like never before with Yahoo!7 Mail.
Learn more: http://au.overview.mail.yahoo.com/
==============================www.birding-aus.org
birding-aus.blogspot.com

To unsubscribe from this mailing list,
send the message:
unsubscribe
(in the body of the message, with no Subject line)
to: birding-aus-request AT vicnet.net.au
==============================
Subject: Twitter Problems
From: Simon Mustoe <simonmustoe AT hotmail.com>
Date: Fri, 6 Nov 2009 22:13:58 +0000
Hi,

Understanding which social networking tools to use, is a big hurdle for most 
people. Let's take Twitter as an example. Rampant use of TwitterFeed is 
starting to dilute the value of what could be a very useful tool for birding. 
TwitterFeed takes the posts from a website and then automatically feeds them 
out via Twitter. Then just imagine, another person can take a feed this 
TwitterFeed and feed it out again, and so on. 


With respect to Russell (sorry Russell, I hope you don't mind this public 
opinion, but it's important), I noticed that this is how the birdline twitter 
sites are done...the problem is, that it doesn't actually work...I get the 
message 'too many tweets' and I can't access content. You can imagine that the 
ultimate benefit will be lost. The basic fact is that you can see this content 
just by visiting the Eremaea site, so why bother? Secondly, twitter is 
ephemeral. There will be no permanent record of the information gathered. If I 
recall, something like 2 months until messages drop off into the ether. 


Twitter is about immediate promotion to the world. It is not the right tool for 
automatically syndicating content and it is not the right tool if we have any 
interest in using posts to generate sightings information. 


For many of the social networking tools (Twitter, Facebook etc) there are too 
many negatives that, in my view, outweigh the benefits that would be needed for 
a sustainable system FOR CONSERVATION and BIRDING (let's face it, there is no 
point in doing this if this isn't the main objective). 


Here is a bit of information that may help people understand more about where 
to put their information. Note, all the tools for birding are there already. 
Use them wisely and draw on their strengths. 


A few rules of engagement:

Your personal website is more important than any other. However, be realistic, 
your website will never reach its full potential unless you SHARE. Make sure 
you track your website using Google Analytics (easy to set up). 

Place all your information on your own website, (or the free one that best 
suits your needs), but promote yourself widely using the range of available 
networking tools (see below). Don't be shy...the true value of your content is 
when it is seen by lots of others, not just by you. 

Understand the strengths and purpose of the different networking tools (see 
below). ONLY use them for the purpose that they were designed.Do not be tempted 
to do too much. Sending every message to all the twitter feeds, every 
discussion forum etc will be a waste of your time and may annoy others. Post 
content that is relevant and interesting.Make sure you link to content that is 
'rich'. There should ideally be some depth and supporting information to your 
content.For more information, see http://blog.wildiaries.com 


HOW THE DIFFERENT BIRDING SITES WORK
---------------------------------------------------

BIRDLINE AUSTRALIA / EREMAEA (Web) - run by Richard and Margaret Alcorn. Use 
this to submit information about rarities. Access their pages here: 
http://www.eremaea.com/BirdlineRecentSightings.aspx?Birdline=6 


FORUMS (DISCUSSION) - BirdingOz - Craig Miller's site, aimed at raising the 
profile of Australia's birding photographers. Very useful thread-based 
discussion forum, distinctly different from Birding-Aus. It caters for lots of 
select groups, wanting to discuss particular issues in small sub-forums. 
http://www.birdingoz.com.au/ 


FORUMS (LISTSERVER) - Birding-Aus - A one-stop-shop place for reaching the 
majority of mainstream birders in Australia, in one hit. Copy information of 
great relevance to the ENTIRE birding community here. Anything that you post to 
BirdingOz or Eremaea could end up here. Make use of links, so you can send 
people, if necessary, back to your rich content. 


TRIP REPORTS (BIRDING DIARY) - Wildiaries - Designed so you can keep a diary of 
your activities over time and provide rich content. Post your best images along 
with text from your trips. Because images and sightings are associated with 
locations, it provides a lasting record of birding activity and contributes to 
a growing database of information about Australian species. Links directly back 
to your own website. You can even embed your trips in your blog / website using 
iframe (like embedding a YouTube video). 


Regards,

Simon.

 		 	   		  
_________________________________________________________________
New Windows 7: Simplify what you do everyday. Find the right PC for you.

http://www.microsoft.com/uk/windows/buy/==============================www.birding-aus.org 

birding-aus.blogspot.com

To unsubscribe from this mailing list,
send the message:
unsubscribe
(in the body of the message, with no Subject line)
to: birding-aus-request AT vicnet.net.au
==============================
Subject: Bowra Report (Short)
From: "Steve" <smurray AT uqconnect.net>
Date: Sat, 7 Nov 2009 06:51:50 +1000
Hello all.. I've just returned from my third trip to Bowra Station in
Western Queensland. I have now sampled Bowra in Autumn, Winter and Spring,
so I guess Summer will be next! Each time I go there it is a different
experience with different species being prominent. E.g., in May 2008
Budgerigars, Diamond Doves, Crimson Chats & Zebra Finches were all
abundant.this time those species were scarce and I did not see one Budgie!
The major difference this time was to experience Bowra after rain (3 days of
heavy rain in fact). This made it very dodgy for two wheeled drive and we
almost got bogged driving in (especially when we had to stop for a very
silly cow!). Our movement around the station was severely curtailed but we
still managed 82 species and had two full days of great birding. Two lifers
for me were Black-eared Cuckoo and Little Woodswallow. A full species list
and Photos have been uploaded to http://aussiebirding.wildiaries.com/  if
anyone is interested.

Cheers Steve Murray

 

===============================
www.birding-aus.org
birding-aus.blogspot.com

To unsubscribe from this mailing list, 
send the message:
unsubscribe 
(in the body of the message, with no Subject line)
to: birding-aus-request AT vicnet.net.au
===============================
Subject: Yellow-backed Lory - Not a new Australian Bird
From: "Philip Veerman" <pveerman AT pcug.org.au>
Date: Fri, 6 Nov 2009 23:24:58 +1100
Tom.

A few years ago I wrote to one of these calendar companies with some
suggestions relating to several incorrect captions and their hideous
grammar (things like Queens Birthday instead of Queen's Birthday - as
though there are many queens, all with the same birthday - even though
it is not her birthday). It is far from unusual to have errors in these
things. I received an invitation to work on the next year's calendars,
which I did (not just their bird ones but a couple others as well). My
recollection is that my suggestions on identification, spelling and
grammar and not least that they also had in their draft, one picture
shown at 90 degrees wrong, were all incorporated into the next year's
calendars, which was nice. It was a few hours work to do that and I
think they sent me a sample pack of them for that year. The following
year I wrote to them again offering to help and never got a reply. 

Then again you get these awful glossy calendars from America called
"eagles" and all their pictures (all 12 of them) show the Bald Eagle,
one and only one species, apparently in ignorance that there are lots of
species of eagles. And the Bald Eagle isn't even a real eagle, it is
just a sea-eagle!

In answer to your question they probably do have a proof reading process
but unless they ask someone sensible and independent it is probably
pretty slack. If any tourist just goes by what shows in calendars or at
least those not produced by reputable organisations, they would be
poorly advised. 

Philip Veerman
24 Castley Circuit
Kambah  ACT  2902
 
02 - 62314041


-----Original Message-----
From: birding-aus-bounces AT vicnet.net.au
[mailto:birding-aus-bounces AT vicnet.net.au] On Behalf Of Tom and Mandy
Wilson
Sent: Friday, 6 November 2009 8:16 PM
To: birding-aus
Subject: [Birding-Aus] Re: Yellow Backed Lory - Not a new Australian
Bird


This one didn't seem to make it yesterday....
----- Original Message ----- 
From: "Tom and Mandy Wilson" 
To: "birding-aus" 
Sent: Thursday, November 05, 2009 9:41 PM
Subject: Yellow Backed Lory - Not a new Australian Bird


 Hi all
I was browsing the bird calendars at Dymocks in Sydney the other day, 
looking to see which one I was going to ask for as a Christmas present,
when 
I encountered a calendar titled "Birds of Australia" by David Messent 
publications.  "Mr. December" was a Yellow Backed Lory, which from what
I 
have worked out is a native of the Moluccas and Indonesia, so unless
either:
- there is a planned influx in 2010 that we don't know about yet and it
will 
qualify by December; or
- one has been seen on Christmas island or a similar territory close to 
Indonesia
it would not qualify as an Australian bird.
Does anybody check these calendars for accuracy?  (You'd hate to be a 
birding tourist coming here expecting to see one because it was on the 
calendar somebody sent you...)
Cheers
Tom Wilson


===============================
www.birding-aus.org
birding-aus.blogspot.com

To unsubscribe from this mailing list, 
send the message:
unsubscribe 
(in the body of the message, with no Subject line)
to: birding-aus-request AT vicnet.net.au
===============================
Subject: RE: Nepean Weir sightings
From: "Paul Dodd" <paul AT angrybluecat.com>
Date: Fri, 6 Nov 2009 22:07:27 +1100
Hi Akos,

I am not a Birdline moderator, but as a keen supporter of the Birdlines and
also an interested party to the recent thread on a rare bird alert system I
thought I'd offer my two bob's worth on this one.

I don't suppose that anyone thought your sighting of a Superb Lyrebird was
in any way "boring". I would not equate "not unusual or rare" with boring in
any way. As a keen bird watcher, I take as much pleasure in seeing common
birds, or indeed special birds like a lyrebird doing their thing as I do in
seeing something rare. And being familiar with some of your photos, I'm sure
that you feel the same way.

However, the purpose of Birdline is "for the reporting of rare or unusual
birds outside their normal range, unusually high or low numbers, early or
late arrivals or departures for migrant species and interesting behaviour or
unusual habitat usage" (quoting the website). So whilst your lyrebird may
not have fallen into any of these categories, some of your other sightings
may well have - I don't know about Nepean Weir, but if we were to have two
Black Bitterns flying in formation in Melbourne, you can be damn sure *that*
sighting would be reported to Birdline.

On the other hand, birding-aus is the perfect forum for reporting or noting
sightings, experiences and generally discussing birds, birding and all
things related.

Paul Dodd
Docklands, Victoria



-----Original Message-----
From: birding-aus-bounces AT vicnet.net.au
[mailto:birding-aus-bounces AT vicnet.net.au] On Behalf Of Ákos Lumnitzer
Sent: Friday, 6 November 2009 6:43 PM
To: Birding-Aus mailing list
Subject: [Birding-Aus] Nepean Weir sightings

Hi birders

I was thinking of reporting this sighting to Birdline, but decided not to
due to a recent experience when one of the moderators kindly dismissed my
report of a wonderful male Superb Lyrebird. Though he (the Lyrebird, I
think I better clarify that though nothing would surprise me) was feeding
on worms and grubs and mimicking a dozen or so species yet in the
moderator's words the observation was not unusual or rare. Perhaps not
unusual as it is a common bird supposedly and what it was doing was normal
and maybe someone of legend twitcher or birder status sees that on every
outing (I'd LOVE to see THAT!), but arguably for 95% of the bird observing
and appreciating folks out there, which does include a birding virgin in
the presence of yours truly in the real bird world, it would be an
incredible sighting and not something they would often witness so most
certainly something more than worthy to share.

By the way, I am still waiting for some definition from this person on
what constitutes a rarity and what should/should not be reported.

So, my common and boring, normal, everyday, mundane and not noteworthy
bird sightings at my local haunt yesterday included two Black Bitterns
flying about 15m above the river in formation, two Rainbow Bee-eaters
(male presenting dragonflies to the lady twice) and a pair of Collared
Sparrowhawks, which I think may well have a nest on an island in the
middle of the river, nest TBC.

I hope your days are filled with far more exciting sightings than those
poor, sad birds. :)

Oh, I also forgot to mention the boring little Musk Lorikeets and Little
Lorikeets that have been keeping me company about 35 meters from my home
for the past two weeks. Two species I have never seen in my western Sydney
suburbs in the eight years since I lived there.

Cheers

-- 
Ákos Lumnitzer


===============================
www.birding-aus.org
birding-aus.blogspot.com

To unsubscribe from this mailing list, 
send the message:
unsubscribe 
(in the body of the message, with no Subject line)
to: birding-aus-request AT vicnet.net.au
===============================

No virus found in this incoming message.
Checked by AVG - www.avg.com 
Version: 8.5.425 / Virus Database: 270.14.52/2483 - Release Date: 11/05/09
19:52:00

==============================www.birding-aus.org
birding-aus.blogspot.com

To unsubscribe from this mailing list,
send the message:
unsubscribe
(in the body of the message, with no Subject line)
to: birding-aus-request AT vicnet.net.au
==============================
Subject: Nepean Weir sightings
From: Ákos Lumnitzer <akos AT amatteroflight.com>
Date: Fri, 6 Nov 2009 18:43:10 +1100
Hi birders

I was thinking of reporting this sighting to Birdline, but decided not to
due to a recent experience when one of the moderators kindly dismissed my
report of a wonderful male Superb Lyrebird. Though he (the Lyrebird, I
think I better clarify that though nothing would surprise me) was feeding
on worms and grubs and mimicking a dozen or so species yet in the
moderator's words the observation was not unusual or rare. Perhaps not
unusual as it is a common bird supposedly and what it was doing was normal
and maybe someone of legend twitcher or birder status sees that on every
outing (I'd LOVE to see THAT!), but arguably for 95% of the bird observing
and appreciating folks out there, which does include a birding virgin in
the presence of yours truly in the real bird world, it would be an
incredible sighting and not something they would often witness so most
certainly something more than worthy to share.

By the way, I am still waiting for some definition from this person on
what constitutes a rarity and what should/should not be reported.

So, my common and boring, normal, everyday, mundane and not noteworthy
bird sightings at my local haunt yesterday included two Black Bitterns
flying about 15m above the river in formation, two Rainbow Bee-eaters
(male presenting dragonflies to the lady twice) and a pair of Collared
Sparrowhawks, which I think may well have a nest on an island in the
middle of the river, nest TBC.

I hope your days are filled with far more exciting sightings than those
poor, sad birds. :)

Oh, I also forgot to mention the boring little Musk Lorikeets and Little
Lorikeets that have been keeping me company about 35 meters from my home
for the past two weeks. Two species I have never seen in my western Sydney
suburbs in the eight years since I lived there.

Cheers

-- 
Ákos Lumnitzer


===============================
www.birding-aus.org
birding-aus.blogspot.com

To unsubscribe from this mailing list, 
send the message:
unsubscribe 
(in the body of the message, with no Subject line)
to: birding-aus-request AT vicnet.net.au
===============================
Subject: Rfi. Duraki
From: John Hammond <johno77 AT y7mail.com>
Date: Thu, 5 Nov 2009 22:15:20 -0800 (PST)
Hi all.. Thinking of heading out to duraki state forest on the weekend and was 
wondering if anyone can give me info on other places around the place to visit. 
I usualy just visit the waterhole off the highway but I have heard there are 
other good sites around duraki. Would be very interested to hear of any recent 
squatter pigeon, black chinned honeyeater or turquoise parrot sightings. Thanks 
very much in advance.. 

John Hammond 




 
__________________________________________________________________________________ 

Get more done like never before with Yahoo!7 Mail.
Learn more: http://au.overview.mail.yahoo.com/
==============================www.birding-aus.org
birding-aus.blogspot.com

To unsubscribe from this mailing list,
send the message:
unsubscribe
(in the body of the message, with no Subject line)
to: birding-aus-request AT vicnet.net.au
==============================
Subject: RE: Little Stint at Woorinen VIC 02 November 2009
From: Peter Ewin <sittella AT hotmail.com>
Date: Fri, 6 Nov 2009 20:55:26 +1100
After seeing this on Eremaea on Wednesday morning (though with no details on 
whether the bird was still present) I decided to detour my trip to Barham for 
work via Woorinen to see if I could pick this up. The assumption that the South 
Darinage Lake was what is called North Lake (of course) on Google I headed to 
Lake Road on the south side of the lake. Very few birds about with Masked 
Lapwing and Silver Gull definite and probably Red-capped Plover way off in the 
heat/salt haze. Maybe I had the wrong spot but it was worth the detour. 

McDonalds Swamp near Koondrook is full of water and has a ridiculous number of 
birds. Highlights included 1 Wood Sandpiper, 1 Glossy Ibis, 1 Spotted Crake, 1 
Greenshank, Marsh Sandpipers (after no sightings in about 3 years I get them 
twice in a week) plus another squillion Native-hen (they really are everywhere 
this year). A scope probably could have yielded many more as many of the ducks 
are a long way off. 

Cheers,
Peter

> Date: Tue, 3 Nov 2009 17:54:41 -0800
> From: bluenuthatch AT yahoo.com.au
> To: birding-aus AT vicnet.net.au
> Subject: [Birding-Aus] Little Stint at Woorinen VIC 02 November 2009
> 
> Hi all,
> at South Drainage Lake, Woorinen, Vic. (about 20 km northwest of Swan Hill) 
myself & Scott Baker found a full breeding plumage Little Stint and obtained a 
number of photographs of same. The bird was observed for over an hour (11:00 - 
12:20) before disappearing. Other highlights in nw. Vic over the long weekend 
were: Pied Honeyeater (50 at Yarrara FFR including flock of 40 on the move over 
the canopy, mostly males), Crimson Chat (Murray Sunset NP & Goschen), Orange 
Chat (almost everywhere in chenopod shrublands), Pacific Golden Plover (1, 
South Drainage Lake), Glossy Ibises, Cockateils, Black Honeyeaters (Goschen), 4 
spp. Woodswallow (all Aus. spp. except Dusky & Little), and Red-lored Whistler 
(Murray Sunset NP). 

> P.S. Lansley.
> 
> 
> 
__________________________________________________________________________________ 

> Get more done like never before with Yahoo!7 Mail.
> Learn more: http://au.overview.mail.yahoo.com/
> ==========www.birding-aus.org
> birding-aus.blogspot.com
> 
> To unsubscribe from this mailing list, 
> send the message:
> unsubscribe 
> (in the body of the message, with no Subject line)
> to: birding-aus-request AT vicnet.net.au
> ==========
 		 	   		  
_________________________________________________________________
Looking to move this spring? With all the lastest places, searching has never 
been easier. Look now! 


http://clk.atdmt.com/NMN/go/157631292/direct/01/==============================www.birding-aus.org 

birding-aus.blogspot.com

To unsubscribe from this mailing list,
send the message:
unsubscribe
(in the body of the message, with no Subject line)
to: birding-aus-request AT vicnet.net.au
==============================
Subject: Re: Yellow Backed Lory - Not a new Australian Bird
From: "Tom and Mandy Wilson" <tomandmandy AT aapt.net.au>
Date: Fri, 6 Nov 2009 20:15:58 +1100
This one didn't seem to make it yesterday....
----- Original Message ----- 
From: "Tom and Mandy Wilson" 
To: "birding-aus" 
Sent: Thursday, November 05, 2009 9:41 PM
Subject: Yellow Backed Lory - Not a new Australian Bird


 Hi all
I was browsing the bird calendars at Dymocks in Sydney the other day, 
looking to see which one I was going to ask for as a Christmas present, when 
I encountered a calendar titled "Birds of Australia" by David Messent 
publications.  "Mr. December" was a Yellow Backed Lory, which from what I 
have worked out is a native of the Moluccas and Indonesia, so unless either:
- there is a planned influx in 2010 that we don't know about yet and it will 
qualify by December; or
- one has been seen on Christmas island or a similar territory close to 
Indonesia
it would not qualify as an Australian bird.
Does anybody check these calendars for accuracy?  (You'd hate to be a 
birding tourist coming here expecting to see one because it was on the 
calendar somebody sent you...)
Cheers
Tom Wilson

===============================
www.birding-aus.org
birding-aus.blogspot.com

To unsubscribe from this mailing list, 
send the message:
unsubscribe 
(in the body of the message, with no Subject line)
to: birding-aus-request AT vicnet.net.au
===============================
Subject: Re: Rare Bird Alert Website
From: "Wendy" <woobinda AT pipeline.com.au>
Date: Thu, 5 Nov 2009 14:01:04 +1000
That is perhaps a bit hazardous in current (and future months) climatic
conditions.
How about a drum/Tom Tom relay or (heralding) horns?
wm

----- Original Message ----- 
From: "Peter Shute" 
To: "Tony Russell" ; "'John Leonard'"
; "'Birding-aus'" 
Sent: Thursday, November 05, 2009 10:28 AM
Subject: RE: [Birding-Aus] Rare Bird Alert Website


I hadn't thought of that.  There may be others like Tony who will require a
smoke signal option.

Peter Shute

Tony Russell wrote on Thursday, 5 November 2009 11:04 AM:

> What's Twitter and Facebook and Web 2.0 apps ??  I still don't use a
> mobile phone - too much to have to carry around (and expensive? ).
> Just watch birding-aus for all the info required.
==========www.birding-aus.org
birding-aus.blogspot.com

To unsubscribe from this mailing list,
send the message:
unsubscribe
(in the body of the message, with no Subject line)
to: birding-aus-request AT vicnet.net.au
==========

===============================
www.birding-aus.org
birding-aus.blogspot.com

To unsubscribe from this mailing list, 
send the message:
unsubscribe 
(in the body of the message, with no Subject line)
to: birding-aus-request AT vicnet.net.au
===============================
Subject: crakes
From: "ninderry" <ninderry AT westnet.com.au>
Date: Thu, 5 Nov 2009 10:59:32 +1000
I had a nice time with crakes this morning at Cooroy Wetlands on the
Sunshine Coast. A Baillon's Crake was flushed twice, showing well. Then a
Spotless Crake offered good views. At least 10 Spotless Crakes were heard
calling.
Greg Roberts
===============================
www.birding-aus.org
birding-aus.blogspot.com

To unsubscribe from this mailing list, 
send the message:
unsubscribe 
(in the body of the message, with no Subject line)
to: birding-aus-request AT vicnet.net.au
===============================
Subject: RE: Pay for Rare Bird Alert...surely not?
From: "Tony Russell" <pratincole AT esc.net.au>
Date: Thu, 5 Nov 2009 10:37:34 +1030
I wouldn't know how to SMS (?) someone even if I had a mobile phone.

-----Original Message-----
From: birding-aus-bounces AT vicnet.net.au
[mailto:birding-aus-bounces AT vicnet.net.au] On Behalf Of David Stowe
Sent: Thursday, November 05, 2009 9:59 AM
To: Simon Mustoe
Cc: birding-aus AT vicnet.net.au
Subject: Re: [Birding-Aus] Pay for Rare Bird Alert...surely not?


Apologies if this has been brought up before (I don't remember seeing  
it but there has been ALOT of information in this topic and my head is  
swimming!) - but what is wrong with a simple SMS system? Everyone pretty
much has a mobile phone and you will get better  
coverage with a phone than having to be able to access internet etc.  
Wouldn't this be the same as a pager (or better)?
I recently switched to Telstra so that i had reception in more areas -  
my upcoming trip to Round Hill being a big consideration being away  
from my family/young baby etc (yes i have a wonderdul wife!). Sorry
again if this has been mentioned and found to be a stupid idea :)

Cheers
David Stowe


On 05/11/2009, at 9:06 AM, Simon Mustoe wrote:


Hi,

Time for me to chip in five cents!

I agree wholeheartedly with all the comments regarding social  
networking tools. Fantastic opportunities for birding.

Let's
not forget though, that long before Twitter and various websites
existed, we all had mobile phones and in times past could even access
the 'world network' using a comprehensive system of pay phones around
the country.

So why then, do we still pine for a Rare Bird Alert System?

The
reason is that it's not just about what tool you use but how you go
about it. There is one important part of the equation that has not yet
been discussed in this forum. I used to know Dick Filby who runs Rare
Bird Alert in the UK. Several of my close friends operated the system. I
was one of the FIRST birders in the UK to have one - Dick gave us
stoodents a freebie, so we could run around shamelessly boasting about
it ... as it went off with an audible alarm, it soon had birders
interested. But its success had nothing to do with the fact it was a
pager.

Rare Bird Alert works because it is manned every day and
in recent years, almost 24/7. It takes the hassle out of communication
because a simple phone call to a recorded message bank and within
minutes, your record is being received by the masses. The middle man
does the networking, so you don't have to. You don't even have to think
about logging on, it simply arrives on your phone wherever you happen to
be, at any time. It's success is due to hard work and, most importantly,
it is funded - so the system is quality controlled. This is really
important.

Yes, social networking tools are great
but they don't satisfy this need now and they won't in the future either
- well not until we have a Wide Area Network over the entire country
(maybe satellite iPhones in future). No medium will actually do the job
unless someone 'drives' the process. I or anyone else could easily use
Twitter to communicate rare birds but I have to also feed my family, so
I am not about to spend hours EVERY day managing and moderating the
process. Maybe we leave it to the masses but as Chris Sanderson says,
you then lose quality control. This was one of the most important
considerations in UK Rare Bird Alert. I can't tell you how frustrated
people got about cock ups. Quality is everything. Then, there is no
guarantee people would even receive the news. IPhone or not, you don't
log on all day every day and you certainly don't can't use an iPhone in
much of the outback - though you can get mobile reception, though GPRS
is going to be costing you the equivalent of satellite bandwidth (~$10 /
MB).

So the way I see it, if
Australians want Rare Bird Alert, then there is really no alternative to
a subscription system with some form of 'alert'. Now that doesn't
preclude the use of social-networking or the web. In fact, it may be
very complimentary.

Chris and I have begun a process to look
into this. If anyone who has not already responded, would like to
provide their thoughts then drop me a line and I will send you a
questionnaire.

Regards,

Simon Mustoe.
	

_________________________________________________________________
Download Messenger onto your mobile for free
http://clk.atdmt.com/UKM/go/174426567/direct/01/www.birding-aus.org
birding-aus.blogspot.com

To unsubscribe from this mailing list,
send the message:
unsubscribe
(in the body of the message, with no Subject line)
to: birding-aus-request AT vicnet.net.au


===============================
www.birding-aus.org
birding-aus.blogspot.com

To unsubscribe from this mailing list, 
send the message:
unsubscribe 
(in the body of the message, with no Subject line)
to: birding-aus-request AT vicnet.net.au ===============================

===============================
www.birding-aus.org
birding-aus.blogspot.com

To unsubscribe from this mailing list, 
send the message:
unsubscribe 
(in the body of the message, with no Subject line)
to: birding-aus-request AT vicnet.net.au
===============================
Subject: Re: Rare Bird Alert Website
From: Peter Shute <pshute AT nuw.org.au>
Date: Thu, 5 Nov 2009 03:03:26 +1100
Luke, when you say "I see our birding websites, including this one, as more 
than just a place to post and discuss rare bird sightings", which website are 
you referring to? 


Peter Shute


--------------------------
Sent using BlackBerry

----- Original Message -----
From: birding-aus-bounces AT vicnet.net.au 
To: Birding Aus 
Sent: Wed Nov 04 21:52:07 2009
Subject: [Birding-Aus] Rare Bird Alert Website

Great to see some good conversations recently on the subject of birding
internet sites, and new online tools for birding. Interesting to note is
that Twitter did not seem to feature in the recent conversation regarding
the *Rare Bird Alert Website*, yet it is probably the best suited (and by
that I mean the technology, and not the brand name itself) to meet the
seemingly increasing demands of 'real-time' mass communication of bird
sightings. The following is an email to Birding-Aus that I intended to post
last week in response to the *Birdlines on Twitter* discussion, but it is
related to the current discussion on *Rare Bird Alert Websites*:

Social Networking (the umbrella that covers Twitter, Facebook, MySpace etc)
might appear to be a relatively new thing, but in fact they are just tools
for online networking. This website, and a number of other locally produced
birding websites, are also prime examples of Social Networking. Birders have
been doing it for years.

It is inevitable that birders will eventually make the transition to using
these tools. Why? Because they are tailored perfectly (well, almost
perfectly) to what we already do, but they will enhance and enrich our
experience. One other reason that this form of communication is inevitable
is that young people of today are brought up with this medium for
communication, and they use it everyday. By that, I mean that they have a
standard way that they expect to receive information.

It is interesting to note some of the comments regarding the introduction of
Birdlines to Twitter, "clutter" being one of them. I agree that it seems
like clutter with all of the new online tools and mobile apps that are
pushed upon us. I also agree that they are somewhat prohibitive given the
cost, but that will change (or at least come down) over time. However, from
the perspective of the next and future generation of birders, "clutter"
would be a word they would use to describe this very website, and a number
of others that are commonly used by birders in Australia. That is purely
because these websites are not presented in a way that a reader can quickly
and easily gather the information they want. The new world wants the answer,
and they want it right away, with minimum effort.

Lets look at a couple of examples of where these new tools can enhance what
we currently do in the birding world:
1. The use of birdlines
Scenario 1 (Current): A birder goes out to the WTP for day. During the day
the birder passes a number of other birders, waving as they go by, as they
do not really know these people. The following day the birder is looking at
Birdline, and notices that someone has posted a sighting of a Ruff. The
birder is disappointed as they did not see the Ruff.
Scenario 2 (Future): A birder goes out to the WTP for a day. The birder is a
subscriber to the new Birdline Twitter feed. Whilst at the plant the birder
receives a live Twitter update that there is a Ruff at the Borrow Pits. The
birder quickly drives down there, and meets with the other birder who just
posted the sighting only minutes earlier. The birder now has a new tick, and
a new friend.

2. Twitching amongst specific groups
Scenario 1 (Current): A Blue-and-White Flycatcher turns up in Broome. One
particular high profile twitcher is telephoned by someone in Broome, and he
has packed his bags and is on his way. This twitcher has about a dozen
friends who would also be interested in seeing this bird, so he calls them
on his mobile, one by one. Who does he call first?
Scenario 2 (Future): A Blue-and-White Flycatcher turns up in Broome. One
particular high profile twitcher is telephoned by someone in Broome, and he
has packed his bags and is on his way. This twitcher has about a dozen
friends who would also be interested in seeing this bird, and he wants to
let them all know at once, but doesn't particularly want to post the site on
the website so everyone can see. Fortunately the twitcher and his friends
have established a closed network so that they can only see each others
posts, and no-one else can see the posts. The twitcher posts to his network,
and all of his fellow twitchers receive the sighting instantly, all at the
same time. They are all on their way, and will probably all arrive at the
same time.

I think the new social networking tools are great, but in their current form
they are not ideal. As birders, we need to shape them into tools that are
useful for what we love doing most: birding!

*End of original email*
*
*
With regards to the latest discussion on Rare Bird Alert Websites, I would
like to bring up a couple of extra points, along the same lines as above.

Firstly, there appears to be an assumption that the users of such websites
are only after rare or unusual sightings - I believe that this is not
entirely true. Speaking for myself, being a novice birder I use the websites
not only to find rare birds, but also to pick up reasonably common or
seasonal birds that I do not yet have on my list. By creating a website that
only posts sightings of rare birds (subjectively), we are restricting the
use of the site, and limiting the possibilities of what the site can become.
A far better way would be to base postings on user defined choices, or
automated rules through coding. Sooner or later birding websites are going
to become so inundated that manual moderation of the site will become almost
impossible. It would be very easy to code in specific rules that
automatically moderate a website so that particular species or locations
would or would not be shown. Along with modern day geographic information
systems (GIS), this could easily become spatially based rules as well. Any
sightings that 'break the rules' so to speak could then be flagged for
manual moderation.

Secondly, the real power of any of these websites is in the contributors. I
have seen some nice looking birding websites out there, but they are not
currently successful because they do not have a wealth of contribution that
some of the other sites have. I believe this comes down to 'usability',
which relates to my comment of 'clutter' in my initial email above. There is
currently also the issue of all of these different tools and websites on
offer that are not in one central location.

For those of you that are keen, do some searching on "Web 2.0" on the
internet (Wikipedia is a good start). Next time you visit your favourite
birding website, ask yourself these questions:
What is it I want to do?
What do I have to do to do it? (i.e. what are the steps involved, how many
clicks does it take to get there, how easy is it to do)
How is the information displayed? Can you think of better ways? Or is this
display perfect as it is?
How long does it take to display in this way? Are maps too slow?
What ways would you like to display or filter the information in your own
way?

The more of us that write down these ideas, the more we can formulate them
into a 'business case' and present them to the current website owners, or
indeed to a budding new website designer. I have plenty of ideas I have
already put on paper, and I would be more than willing to discuss them with
anyone here. They range from ways to mass communicate (e.g. twitter etc), to
social networks for creating and sharing bird lists, events etc (e.g.
Facebook etc), all the way to submitting survey and Atlas records. The
possibilities are endless.

I see our birding websites, including this one, as more than just a place to
post and discuss rare bird sightings. I see them as a gateway to the great
pastime of birding, for novices and veterans alike, and the more we come to
realise that, the many more people will come to enjoy birding both now and
into the future.

Regards,

Luke
===============================
www.birding-aus.org
birding-aus.blogspot.com

To unsubscribe from this mailing list, 
send the message:
unsubscribe 
(in the body of the message, with no Subject line)
to: birding-aus-request AT vicnet.net.au
===============================
===============================
www.birding-aus.org
birding-aus.blogspot.com

To unsubscribe from this mailing list, 
send the message:
unsubscribe 
(in the body of the message, with no Subject line)
to: birding-aus-request AT vicnet.net.au
===============================
Subject: RE: Pay for Rare Bird Alert...surely not?
From: "Tony Russell" <pratincole AT esc.net.au>
Date: Fri, 6 Nov 2009 17:36:11 +1030
They were probably out of season, they usually fruit in December
/January.

-----Original Message-----
From: birding-aus-bounces AT vicnet.net.au
[mailto:birding-aus-bounces AT vicnet.net.au] On Behalf Of Alistair
McKeough
Sent: Friday, November 06, 2009 4:18 PM
To: Simon Mustoe
Cc: birding-aus AT vicnet.net.au
Subject: Re: [Birding-Aus] Pay for Rare Bird Alert...surely not?


One of the principle advantages of my recent trip to western NSW was
that I had no Blackberry reception. Bliss.



2009/11/6 Simon Mustoe 

>
> It's funny isn't it...it's more of a peace of mind thing I suppose. 
> The more technology allows us to stay connected whilst allowing us the

> freedom to roam into the wilderness, the more paranoid we become about

> disconnecting ourselves from our everyday lives.
>
> Regards,
>
> Simon.
>
>
>
>
>
> > From: pshute AT nuw.org.au
> > To: simonmustoe AT hotmail.com; birding-aus AT vicnet.net.au
> > Date: Fri, 6 Nov 2009 14:14:32 +1100
> > Subject: RE: [Birding-Aus] Pay for Rare Bird Alert...surely not?
> >
> > Several people have mentioned the problem of receiving email in 
> > remote
> areas, e.g. via an iPhone, etc.  I'm wondering how important this is 
> to most people.  If you're in a remote area, are you going to be 
> willing to drop everything and go somewhere to see a bird somewhere 
> else?
> >
> > I would have thought you'd only be interested if the alert was for
> something close by (in which case you'd be very annoyed to have been 
> so close but to have missed it).  But what are the chances of that?  
> I'm guessing that usually it would be ok to wait until you can get 
> email again.
> >
> > I'm just guessing about this, I'm rarely out of range for long 
> > myself,
> unfortunately.
> >
> > Peter Shute
> >
> > Simon Mustoe wrote on Thursday, 5 November 2009 9:06 AM:
> >
> > > Then, there is no guarantee people would even receive the news. 
> > > IPhone or not, you don't log on all day every day and you 
> > > certainly don't can't use an iPhone in much of the outback - 
> > > though you can get mobile reception, though GPRS is going to be 
> > > costing you the equivalent of satellite bandwidth (~$10 / MB).
>
> _________________________________________________________________
> New Windows 7: Simplify what you do everyday. Find the right PC for 
> you. http://www.microsoft.com/uk/windows/buy/www.birding-aus.org
> birding-aus.blogspot.com
>
> To unsubscribe from this mailing list,
> send the message:
> unsubscribe
> (in the body of the message, with no Subject line)
> to: birding-aus-request AT vicnet.net.au
>
===============================
www.birding-aus.org
birding-aus.blogspot.com

To unsubscribe from this mailing list, 
send the message:
unsubscribe 
(in the body of the message, with no Subject line)
to: birding-aus-request AT vicnet.net.au ===============================

===============================
www.birding-aus.org
birding-aus.blogspot.com

To unsubscribe from this mailing list, 
send the message:
unsubscribe 
(in the body of the message, with no Subject line)
to: birding-aus-request AT vicnet.net.au
===============================
Subject: RE: One birder tackles the technology- TwitchathononTwitter
From: "Paul Dodd" <paul AT angrybluecat.com>
Date: Fri, 6 Nov 2009 18:09:13 +1100
In the spirit of making this the first ever "Twitter-enabled" Twitchaton,
Ruth and I will also "tweet" from time to time. I cannot claim that our
tweets will be anywhere near as humorous (or probably as frequent) as Dools'
but we'll do our best!

Paul: www.twitter.com/paulgdodd
Ruth: www.twitter.com/falconet69

We are competing as the "Gang-gang Gang" with Russell Woodford, Karen
Pearson and Peter Shute - I am not sure that they will be tweeting, but
Peter may be updating birding-aus on our exploits from his Blackberry.

Good luck to all teams competing this weekend!

Paul Dodd
Docklands, Victoria



-----Original Message-----
From: birding-aus-bounces AT vicnet.net.au
[mailto:birding-aus-bounces AT vicnet.net.au] On Behalf Of michael norris
Sent: Friday, 6 November 2009 4:53 PM
To: birding-aus AT vicnet.net.au
Subject: Re: [Birding-Aus] One birder tackles the technology-
TwitchathononTwitter

Yup - you can see (and reply to) the tweets on the web.

And sponsor the Bush Turkeys that way.

Michael Norris (aka  AT Hydromys)

> -----Original Message-----
>
> Inspired by the discussion on how technology can be used by birders, I
> have decided to attempt to put the attempt of our twitchathon team (The
> Bush Turkeys) to win this year's Victorian race on Twitter.
>
> But if anyone wants to follow us, check out
> http://twitter.com/Twitchathon for hopefully live updates on how we are
> going. > If anyone would like to sponsor the Bush Turkeys contact me on 
> this
> email address or on Twitter where apparently you put  AT Twitchathon before
> your message. All funds raised this year go to BA VicGroups bird study
> grants, providing vital funds for research into our local birds.
>
> Sean (Captain Turk) Dooley

===============================
www.birding-aus.org
birding-aus.blogspot.com

To unsubscribe from this mailing list, 
send the message:
unsubscribe 
(in the body of the message, with no Subject line)
to: birding-aus-request AT vicnet.net.au
===============================

No virus found in this incoming message.
Checked by AVG - www.avg.com 
Version: 8.5.425 / Virus Database: 270.14.51/2482 - Release Date: 11/05/09
19:52:00

===============================
www.birding-aus.org
birding-aus.blogspot.com

To unsubscribe from this mailing list, 
send the message:
unsubscribe 
(in the body of the message, with no Subject line)
to: birding-aus-request AT vicnet.net.au
===============================
Subject: RE: Re: Hall's Babbler Fowler's Gap
From: Peter Ewin <sittella AT hotmail.com>
Date: Fri, 6 Nov 2009 17:50:42 +1100
Hi Tim - I am interested in your comment about Babbler's being found around 
Brewarrina. If it is the town then it is long way east of Mutawintji (Bre is on 
the Darling River upstream of Bourke). Maybe there is a property near 
Mutawintji with the same name? 

The person to contact re Hall's Babblers is Dean Portelli who's e-mail address 
should be available in the archives. 

Cheers,
Peter

> Date: Thu, 5 Nov 2009 22:26:57 +1100
> From: Tim.Dolby AT vu.edu.au
> To: birding-aus AT vicnet.net.au
> Subject: [Birding-Aus] Re: Hall's Babbler Fowler's Gap
> 
> Hi Peter,
> 
> I'm not sure about Fowler's Gap Research Station, but they are found nearby 
at Mutawintji (Mootwingee) National Park, 130 km nth of Broken Hill. Restricted 
to the gorge systems of Mutawintji (such as Amphitheatre Gorge), they are also 
present within the restricted northern area of the park. They are also recorded 
recently around the township of Brewarrina, east of Mutawintji. 

> 
> Hall's Babbler is listed in the 'Birds of the Milparinka District and Cooper 
Creek Basin' (which incorporates Fowler's Gap) by E Wyndham, Emu 78 (4) 179 - 
187. Perhaps this is where you saw your reference to Fowler's Gap? 

> 
> Really interested to hear if any other records turn up in the area Peter.
> 
> Cheers,
> 
> Tim Dolby
> 
> _______________________________
> 
> Hi birders,
> 
> I recently came across a mention of Hall's Babbler for the Fowlers Gap
> Research Station in far-western NSW (north of Broken Hill). Does
> anyone know if they're actually present at this location? Has anyone
> been there?
> 
> cheers
> 
> Peter
> 
> 
> 
> 
> This email, including any attachment, is intended solely for the use of the 
intended recipient. It is confidential and may contain personal information or 
be subject to legal professional privilege. If you are not the intended 
recipient any use, disclosure, reproduction or storage of it is unauthorised. 
If you have received this email in error, please advise the sender via return 
email and delete it from your system immediately. Victoria University does not 
warrant that this email is free from viruses or defects and accepts no 
liability for any damage caused by such viruses or defects. 

> ==========www.birding-aus.org
> birding-aus.blogspot.com
> 
> To unsubscribe from this mailing list, 
> send the message:
> unsubscribe 
> (in the body of the message, with no Subject line)
> to: birding-aus-request AT vicnet.net.au
> ==========
 		 	   		  
_________________________________________________________________
Looking to move this spring? With all the lastest places, searching has never 
been easier. Look now! 


http://clk.atdmt.com/NMN/go/157631292/direct/01/==============================www.birding-aus.org 

birding-aus.blogspot.com

To unsubscribe from this mailing list,
send the message:
unsubscribe
(in the body of the message, with no Subject line)
to: birding-aus-request AT vicnet.net.au
==============================
Subject: Re: Night photography
From: Chris Charles <licole AT ozemail.com.au>
Date: Fri, 6 Nov 2009 17:29:12 +1100
Akos,
Archive item http://bioacoustics.cse.unsw.edu.au/birding-aus/1997-04/ 
msg00006.html
should tell you what you need to know.
Chris


Chris Charles
0412 911 184
licole AT ozemail.com.au
33deg 47'30"S
151deg10'09"E





On 06/11/2009, at 2:52 PM, Ákos Lumnitzer wrote:

> Hi birders
>
> Firstly, apologies if this is a subject that had been discussed  
> before.
>
> Can anyone shed light on photographing nocturnal birds, or to be more
> specific, the impact of shining a torch on them and taking a photo  
> using
> flash? Is there any scientific research that had been done to support
> people claiming that it is bad practice? Any papers (or pointing me to
> specific ones) dealing with this subject would be most appreciated,  
> or at
> least some authors and their relevant scientific research articles. I
> should still be able to log into my uni online database to retrieve
> articles despite just having graduated six weeks ago.
>
> Would a flash (camera flash) be like a lighting strike nearby?  
> Would it
> really be THAT harmful to the nocturnal birds’ night vision?
>
> Thanks and regards
>
> Akos
>
>
>
>
>
> -- 
> Ákos Lumnitzer
> http://www.amatteroflight.com
>
> ===============================
> www.birding-aus.org
> birding-aus.blogspot.com
>
> To unsubscribe from this mailing list,
> send the message:
> unsubscribe
> (in the body of the message, with no Subject line)
> to: birding-aus-request AT vicnet.net.au
> ===============================

==============================www.birding-aus.org
birding-aus.blogspot.com

To unsubscribe from this mailing list,
send the message:
unsubscribe
(in the body of the message, with no Subject line)
to: birding-aus-request AT vicnet.net.au
==============================
Subject: Re: One birder tackles the technology- TwitchathononTwitter
From: "michael norris" <menorris AT ozemail.com.au>
Date: Fri, 6 Nov 2009 16:53:27 +1100
Yup - you can see (and reply to) the tweets on the web.

And sponsor the Bush Turkeys that way.

Michael Norris (aka  AT Hydromys)

----- Original Message ----- 
From: "Tony Russell" 

> Aha ! So that's the twitter website. I wondered how to access it.
> Thanks Dools.
>
> T.
>
> -----Original Message-----
>
> Inspired by the discussion on how technology can be used by birders, I
> have decided to attempt to put the attempt of our twitchathon team (The
> Bush Turkeys) to win this year's Victorian race on Twitter.
>
> But if anyone wants to follow us, check out
> http://twitter.com/Twitchathon for hopefully live updates on how we are
> going. > If anyone would like to sponsor the Bush Turkeys contact me on 
> this
> email address or on Twitter where apparently you put  AT Twitchathon before
> your message. All funds raised this year go to BA VicGroups bird study
> grants, providing vital funds for research into our local birds.
>
> Sean (Captain Turk) Dooley

===============================
www.birding-aus.org
birding-aus.blogspot.com

To unsubscribe from this mailing list, 
send the message:
unsubscribe 
(in the body of the message, with no Subject line)
to: birding-aus-request AT vicnet.net.au
===============================
Subject: Re: Pay for Rare Bird Alert...surely not?
From: Alistair McKeough <alistair.mckeough AT gmail.com>
Date: Fri, 6 Nov 2009 16:48:09 +1100
One of the principle advantages of my recent trip to western NSW was that I
had no Blackberry reception. Bliss.



2009/11/6 Simon Mustoe 

>
> It's funny isn't it...it's more of a peace of mind thing I suppose. The
> more technology allows us to stay connected whilst allowing us the freedom
> to roam into the wilderness, the more paranoid we become about disconnecting
> ourselves from our everyday lives.
>
> Regards,
>
> Simon.
>
>
>
>
>
> > From: pshute AT nuw.org.au
> > To: simonmustoe AT hotmail.com; birding-aus AT vicnet.net.au
> > Date: Fri, 6 Nov 2009 14:14:32 +1100
> > Subject: RE: [Birding-Aus] Pay for Rare Bird Alert...surely not?
> >
> > Several people have mentioned the problem of receiving email in remote
> areas, e.g. via an iPhone, etc.  I'm wondering how important this is to most
> people.  If you're in a remote area, are you going to be willing to drop
> everything and go somewhere to see a bird somewhere else?
> >
> > I would have thought you'd only be interested if the alert was for
> something close by (in which case you'd be very annoyed to have been so
> close but to have missed it).  But what are the chances of that?  I'm
> guessing that usually it would be ok to wait until you can get email again.
> >
> > I'm just guessing about this, I'm rarely out of range for long myself,
> unfortunately.
> >
> > Peter Shute
> >
> > Simon Mustoe wrote on Thursday, 5 November 2009 9:06 AM:
> >
> > > Then, there is no guarantee people would even receive the news.
> > > IPhone or not, you don't log on all day every day and you certainly
> > > don't can't use an iPhone in much of the outback - though you can get
> > > mobile reception, though GPRS is going to be costing you the
> > > equivalent of satellite bandwidth (~$10 / MB).
>
> _________________________________________________________________
> New Windows 7: Simplify what you do everyday. Find the right PC for you.
> http://www.microsoft.com/uk/windows/buy/www.birding-aus.org
> birding-aus.blogspot.com
>
> To unsubscribe from this mailing list,
> send the message:
> unsubscribe
> (in the body of the message, with no Subject line)
> to: birding-aus-request AT vicnet.net.au
>
===============================
www.birding-aus.org
birding-aus.blogspot.com

To unsubscribe from this mailing list, 
send the message:
unsubscribe 
(in the body of the message, with no Subject line)
to: birding-aus-request AT vicnet.net.au
===============================
Subject: RE: Pay for Rare Bird Alert...surely not?
From: Simon Mustoe <simonmustoe AT hotmail.com>
Date: Fri, 6 Nov 2009 05:42:33 +0000
It's funny isn't it...it's more of a peace of mind thing I suppose. The more 
technology allows us to stay connected whilst allowing us the freedom to roam 
into the wilderness, the more paranoid we become about disconnecting ourselves 
from our everyday lives. 


Regards,

Simon.

 



> From: pshute AT nuw.org.au
> To: simonmustoe AT hotmail.com; birding-aus AT vicnet.net.au
> Date: Fri, 6 Nov 2009 14:14:32 +1100
> Subject: RE: [Birding-Aus] Pay for Rare Bird Alert...surely not?
> 
> Several people have mentioned the problem of receiving email in remote areas, 
e.g. via an iPhone, etc. I'm wondering how important this is to most people. If 
you're in a remote area, are you going to be willing to drop everything and go 
somewhere to see a bird somewhere else? 

> 
> I would have thought you'd only be interested if the alert was for something 
close by (in which case you'd be very annoyed to have been so close but to have 
missed it). But what are the chances of that? I'm guessing that usually it 
would be ok to wait until you can get email again. 

> 
> I'm just guessing about this, I'm rarely out of range for long myself, 
unfortunately. 

> 
> Peter Shute
> 
> Simon Mustoe wrote on Thursday, 5 November 2009 9:06 AM:
> 
> > Then, there is no guarantee people would even receive the news.
> > IPhone or not, you don't log on all day every day and you certainly
> > don't can't use an iPhone in much of the outback - though you can get
> > mobile reception, though GPRS is going to be costing you the
> > equivalent of satellite bandwidth (~$10 / MB).              
 		 	   		  
_________________________________________________________________
New Windows 7: Simplify what you do everyday. Find the right PC for you.

http://www.microsoft.com/uk/windows/buy/==============================www.birding-aus.org 

birding-aus.blogspot.com

To unsubscribe from this mailing list,
send the message:
unsubscribe
(in the body of the message, with no Subject line)
to: birding-aus-request AT vicnet.net.au
==============================
Subject: Night photography
From: Ákos Lumnitzer <akos AT amatteroflight.com>
Date: Fri, 6 Nov 2009 14:52:01 +1100
Hi birders

Firstly, apologies if this is a subject that had been discussed before.

Can anyone shed light on photographing nocturnal birds, or to be more
specific, the impact of shining a torch on them and taking a photo using
flash? Is there any scientific research that had been done to support
people claiming that it is bad practice? Any papers (or pointing me to
specific ones) dealing with this subject would be most appreciated, or at
least some authors and their relevant scientific research articles. I
should still be able to log into my uni online database to retrieve
articles despite just having graduated six weeks ago.

Would a flash (camera flash) be like a lighting strike nearby? Would it
really be THAT harmful to the nocturnal birds’ night vision?

Thanks and regards

Akos





-- 
Ákos Lumnitzer
http://www.amatteroflight.com

===============================
www.birding-aus.org
birding-aus.blogspot.com

To unsubscribe from this mailing list, 
send the message:
unsubscribe 
(in the body of the message, with no Subject line)
to: birding-aus-request AT vicnet.net.au
===============================
Subject: Re: Pay for Rare Bird Alert...surely not?
From: David Stowe <davidstowe AT optusnet.com.au>
Date: Fri, 6 Nov 2009 14:42:47 +1100
What if the rarity is also in a remote place just down the road from  
where you are?????
Plenty of good birding spots that are in remote locations that are  
relatively well travelled by birders. I'd be even more annoyed if i  
had made a trip all the way to the Kimberley or Cape etc only to find  
that i had missed something while i was there.

Dave

On 06/11/2009, at 2:14 PM, Peter Shute wrote:

Several people have mentioned the problem of receiving email in remote  
areas, e.g. via an iPhone, etc.  I'm wondering how important this is  
to most people.  If you're in a remote area, are you going to be  
willing to drop everything and go somewhere to see a bird somewhere  
else?

I would have thought you'd only be interested if the alert was for  
something close by (in which case you'd be very annoyed to have been  
so close but to have missed it).  But what are the chances of that?   
I'm guessing that usually it would be ok to wait until you can get  
email again.

I'm just guessing about this, I'm rarely out of range for long myself,  
unfortunately.

Peter Shute

Simon Mustoe wrote on Thursday, 5 November 2009 9:06 AM:

> Then, there is no guarantee people would even receive the news.
> IPhone or not, you don't log on all day every day and you certainly
> don't can't use an iPhone in much of the outback - though you can get
> mobile reception, though GPRS is going to be costing you the
> equivalent of satellite bandwidth (~$10 / MB).
www.birding-aus.org
birding-aus.blogspot.com

To unsubscribe from this mailing list,
send the message:
unsubscribe
(in the body of the message, with no Subject line)
to: birding-aus-request AT vicnet.net.au


===============================
www.birding-aus.org
birding-aus.blogspot.com

To unsubscribe from this mailing list, 
send the message:
unsubscribe 
(in the body of the message, with no Subject line)
to: birding-aus-request AT vicnet.net.au
===============================
Subject: RE: Pay for Rare Bird Alert...surely not?
From: Peter Shute <pshute AT nuw.org.au>
Date: Fri, 6 Nov 2009 14:14:32 +1100
Several people have mentioned the problem of receiving email in remote areas, 
e.g. via an iPhone, etc. I'm wondering how important this is to most people. If 
you're in a remote area, are you going to be willing to drop everything and go 
somewhere to see a bird somewhere else? 


I would have thought you'd only be interested if the alert was for something 
close by (in which case you'd be very annoyed to have been so close but to have 
missed it). But what are the chances of that? I'm guessing that usually it 
would be ok to wait until you can get email again. 


I'm just guessing about this, I'm rarely out of range for long myself, 
unfortunately. 


Peter Shute

Simon Mustoe wrote on Thursday, 5 November 2009 9:06 AM:

> Then, there is no guarantee people would even receive the news.
> IPhone or not, you don't log on all day every day and you certainly
> don't can't use an iPhone in much of the outback - though you can get
> mobile reception, though GPRS is going to be costing you the
> equivalent of satellite bandwidth (~$10 / MB).              
==============================www.birding-aus.org
birding-aus.blogspot.com

To unsubscribe from this mailing list,
send the message:
unsubscribe
(in the body of the message, with no Subject line)
to: birding-aus-request AT vicnet.net.au
==============================
Subject: RE: Re: Recording data
From: Peter Shute <pshute AT nuw.org.au>
Date: Fri, 6 Nov 2009 13:54:40 +1100
Eremaea, and presumably others, will do the the stats you mention, but you'd 
better have a look to make sure it's just how you want it, if you don't mind 
storing data online for others to see. 


Access can do exactly the same graphs that Excel can do, if that's going to 
solve the problem, I think it's actually the same software shared by both 
programs. Might be worth Googling for how to get started with it. 


Peter Shute

mandmyoung AT optusnet.com.au wrote on Friday, 6 November 2009 1:44 PM:

> Hi Everyone.
> 
> I'm just wondering if there is any specific software, or web
> application that is available for recording trips, life lists, year
> lists etc?  
> At the moment I use an MS Spreadsheet based on Christidis and Boles
> 2008 for my life list, year list, trips etc, but I find that it just
> doesn't have the flexibility that I want from it.  
> 
> I'm looking for an application that will allow me to input data taken
> over a period of time, then to produce different graph reports. I
> want to have different reports that will allow me to show how many
> species visit a certain location over the period of a year, or how
> many of a particular species was seen at a location over the period
> of a year, and other similar type of reports.     
> 
> I can create reports within MS Access that will do the reporting the
> way that I want it to, but I can't get it to print it out as a graph.
> And I can create reports within MS Excel that will print out the
> report in a graph, but the data entry is tedious and time consuming,
> because I can't work out how to create a data entry template that
> captures the data for the report. I have to input the data manually
> each time.      
> 
> I have been toying with the idea of creating a web-based application
> that will allow me enter in data from trips (Species, age, sex, etc
> etc), then prints out a report by location, species, age, sex etc, so
> that I can see species specifics for a location over a given period.
> However, the learning curve for that is more than my basic HTML
> editing skills can handle.     
> 
> Any help is much appreciated.
> 
> Regards,
> Mark
> ===============================
> www.birding-aus.org
> birding-aus.blogspot.com
> 
> To unsubscribe from this mailing list,
> send the message:
> unsubscribe
> (in the body of the message, with no Subject line)
> to: birding-aus-request AT vicnet.net.au
> 
=============================================================www.birding-aus.org 

birding-aus.blogspot.com

To unsubscribe from this mailing list,
send the message:
unsubscribe
(in the body of the message, with no Subject line)
to: birding-aus-request AT vicnet.net.au
==============================
Subject: Re: Recording data
From: mandmyoung AT optusnet.com.au
Date: Fri, 06 Nov 2009 13:43:49 +1100
Hi Everyone.

I'm just wondering if there is any specific software, or web application that 
is available for recording trips, life lists, year lists etc? 

At the moment I use an MS Spreadsheet based on Christidis and Boles 2008 for my 
life list, year list, trips etc, but I find that it just doesn't have the 
flexibility that I want from it. 


I'm looking for an application that will allow me to input data taken over a 
period of time, then to produce different graph reports. I want to have 
different reports that will allow me to show how many species visit a certain 
location over the period of a year, or how many of a particular species was 
seen at a location over the period of a year, and other similar type of 
reports. 


I can create reports within MS Access that will do the reporting the way that I 
want it to, but I can't get it to print it out as a graph. And I can create 
reports within MS Excel that will print out the report in a graph, but the data 
entry is tedious and time consuming, because I can't work out how to create a 
data entry template that captures the data for the report. I have to input the 
data manually each time. 


I have been toying with the idea of creating a web-based application that will 
allow me enter in data from trips (Species, age, sex, etc etc), then prints out 
a report by location, species, age, sex etc, so that I can see species 
specifics for a location over a given period. However, the learning curve for 
that is more than my basic HTML editing skills can handle. 


Any help is much appreciated.

Regards,
Mark
===============================
www.birding-aus.org
birding-aus.blogspot.com

To unsubscribe from this mailing list, 
send the message:
unsubscribe 
(in the body of the message, with no Subject line)
to: birding-aus-request AT vicnet.net.au
===============================
Subject: Re: Common-Uncommon-Rare
From: Dave Torr <davidtorr AT gmail.com>
Date: Fri, 6 Nov 2009 13:12:59 +1100
I have seen some in the US that use the latter system - maybe with a range
of %ages as well, The trouble with absolute numbers is that they depend on
how many times the place has been visited! Many of course are seasonal as
well.....


2009/11/6 Tim Dolby 

> Just off the top of my head, one way of doing this is by the number of
> recorded sightings i.e. vagrant equals <10, rare <100, uncommon <1000,
> common >1000+, or something like that, depending on your context, place,
> birds etc.
>
> Another way is to link it to the particular habitat type, such 'vagrant:
> few records in appropriate habitat', 'rare: rarely seen in appropriate
> habitat', 'uncommon: occasionally seen in the appropriate habitat',
> 'common: expect to see in appropriate habitat', and 'very common: you'll
> be kicking them out of your way!'
>
> Hope this helps.
>
> Tim
>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: birding-aus-bounces AT vicnet.net.au
> [mailto:birding-aus-bounces AT vicnet.net.au] On Behalf Of Pine Creek
> Pictures
> Sent: Friday, 6 November 2009 11:54 AM
> To: birding-aus AT vicnet.net.au
> Subject: [Birding-Aus] Common-Uncommon-Rare
>
> Does anyone know if there is a standard definition of the terms Common,
> Uncommon, Rare.
>
> We are in the process of trying to update some brochures and attempting
> to assign a frequency of occurrence to the bird species.
>
> This is traditionally done with the the notations C=Common, U=Uncomon,
> R=Rare, V=vagrant etc.
>
> Here I have at least 8 various publications and checklists, all of which
> give a different definition to these terms.
>
> Thanks
>
> Dominic Chaplin
> Cairns, QLD
>
> ==========www.birding-aus.org
> birding-aus.blogspot.com
>
> To unsubscribe from this mailing list,
> send the message:
> unsubscribe
> (in the body of the message, with no Subject line)
> to: birding-aus-request AT vicnet.net.au
> ==========
>
>
> This email, including any attachment, is intended solely for the use of the
> intended recipient. It is confidential and may contain personal information
> or be subject to legal professional privilege. If you are not the intended
> recipient any use, disclosure, reproduction or storage of it is
> unauthorised. If you have received this email in error, please advise the
> sender via return email and delete it from your system immediately. Victoria
> University does not warrant that this email is free from viruses or defects
> and accepts no liability for any damage caused by such viruses or defects.
> www.birding-aus.org
> birding-aus.blogspot.com
>
> To unsubscribe from this mailing list,
> send the message:
> unsubscribe
> (in the body of the message, with no Subject line)
> to: birding-aus-request AT vicnet.net.au
>
===============================
www.birding-aus.org
birding-aus.blogspot.com

To unsubscribe from this mailing list, 
send the message:
unsubscribe 
(in the body of the message, with no Subject line)
to: birding-aus-request AT vicnet.net.au
===============================
Subject: RE: Common-Uncommon-Rare
From: "Tim Dolby" <Tim.Dolby AT vu.edu.au>
Date: Fri, 6 Nov 2009 12:54:31 +1100
Just off the top of my head, one way of doing this is by the number of
recorded sightings i.e. vagrant equals <10, rare <100, uncommon <1000,
common >1000+, or something like that, depending on your context, place,
birds etc.

Another way is to link it to the particular habitat type, such 'vagrant:
few records in appropriate habitat', 'rare: rarely seen in appropriate
habitat', 'uncommon: occasionally seen in the appropriate habitat',
'common: expect to see in appropriate habitat', and 'very common: you'll
be kicking them out of your way!'

Hope this helps. 

Tim

-----Original Message-----
From: birding-aus-bounces AT vicnet.net.au
[mailto:birding-aus-bounces AT vicnet.net.au] On Behalf Of Pine Creek
Pictures
Sent: Friday, 6 November 2009 11:54 AM
To: birding-aus AT vicnet.net.au
Subject: [Birding-Aus] Common-Uncommon-Rare

Does anyone know if there is a standard definition of the terms Common,
Uncommon, Rare.

We are in the process of trying to update some brochures and attempting
to assign a frequency of occurrence to the bird species.

This is traditionally done with the the notations C=Common, U=Uncomon,
R=Rare, V=vagrant etc.

Here I have at least 8 various publications and checklists, all of which
give a different definition to these terms.

Thanks

Dominic Chaplin
Cairns, QLD

==========www.birding-aus.org
birding-aus.blogspot.com

To unsubscribe from this mailing list, 
send the message:
unsubscribe 
(in the body of the message, with no Subject line)
to: birding-aus-request AT vicnet.net.au
==========


This email, including any attachment, is intended solely for the use of the 
intended recipient. It is confidential and may contain personal information or 
be subject to legal professional privilege. If you are not the intended 
recipient any use, disclosure, reproduction or storage of it is unauthorised. 
If you have received this email in error, please advise the sender via return 
email and delete it from your system immediately. Victoria University does not 
warrant that this email is free from viruses or defects and accepts no 
liability for any damage caused by such viruses or defects. 

==============================www.birding-aus.org
birding-aus.blogspot.com

To unsubscribe from this mailing list,
send the message:
unsubscribe
(in the body of the message, with no Subject line)
to: birding-aus-request AT vicnet.net.au
==============================
Subject: Doth Feathers Maketh the Bird, or the Dinosaur?
From: Carl Clifford <carlsclifford AT gmail.com>
Date: Fri, 6 Nov 2009 12:29:36 +1100
Dear All,

New research has come up with some interesting findings on the  
Archeopteryx. See  http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=fVNXXLLUYFM

Cheers,

Carl Clifford
===============================
www.birding-aus.org
birding-aus.blogspot.com

To unsubscribe from this mailing list, 
send the message:
unsubscribe 
(in the body of the message, with no Subject line)
to: birding-aus-request AT vicnet.net.au
===============================
Subject: Common-Uncommon-Rare
From: "Pine Creek Pictures" <dominic AT pinecreekpictures.com.au>
Date: Fri, 6 Nov 2009 10:53:35 +1000
Does anyone know if there is a standard definition of the terms Common, 
Uncommon, Rare. 


We are in the process of trying to update some brochures and attempting to 
assign a frequency of occurrence to the bird species. 


This is traditionally done with the the notations C=Common, U=Uncomon, R=Rare, 
V=vagrant etc. 


Here I have at least 8 various publications and checklists, all of which give a 
different definition to these terms. 


Thanks

Dominic Chaplin
Cairns, QLD

==============================www.birding-aus.org
birding-aus.blogspot.com

To unsubscribe from this mailing list,
send the message:
unsubscribe
(in the body of the message, with no Subject line)
to: birding-aus-request AT vicnet.net.au
==============================
Subject: Papua New Guinea visit Report No. 3
From: "Pine Creek Pictures" <dominic AT pinecreekpictures.com.au>
Date: Fri, 6 Nov 2009 09:33:01 +1000
Words apear to have all run together as viewed so I'll try again. 
Dominic.Report text only http://www.surfbirds.com/trip_report.php?id=1712Report 
with images http://www.pinecreekpictures.com.au/png5.html 

==============================www.birding-aus.org
birding-aus.blogspot.com

To unsubscribe from this mailing list,
send the message:
unsubscribe
(in the body of the message, with no Subject line)
to: birding-aus-request AT vicnet.net.au
==============================
Subject: Re: One birder tackles the technology- Twitchathon onTwitter
From: Alistair McKeough <alistair.mckeough AT gmail.com>
Date: Fri, 6 Nov 2009 09:35:47 +1100
http://lmgtfy.com/?q=twitter

2009/11/6 Tony Russell 

> Aha ! So that's the twitter website. I wondered how to access it.
> Thanks Dools.
>
> T.
>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: birding-aus-bounces AT vicnet.net.au
> [mailto:birding-aus-bounces AT vicnet.net.au] On Behalf Of Sean Dooley
> Sent: Friday, November 06, 2009 7:24 AM
> To: birding-aus AT vicnet.net.au
> Subject: [Birding-Aus] One birder tackles the technology- Twitchathon
> onTwitter
>
>
> Inspired by the discussion on how technology can be used by birders, I
> have decided to attempt to put the attempt of our twitchathon team (The
> Bush
> Turkeys) to win this year's Victorian race on Twitter. Being a rather
> late adapter of new technology (I still don't trust them fancy, new
> fangled smoke
> signals!) this could be a bit of a disaster, particularly as for much of
> the race I thin kwe will be out of range for me to send any tweets.
>
>
>
> But if anyone wants to follow us, check out
> http://twitter.com/Twitchathon for hopefully live updates on how we are
> going. Members of the Bush Turkeys have been involved in the Thon from
> the very first Twitchathon and the team has existed since 1989 and have
> competed as a team ten times previously managing to win four times. We
> haven't raced since 2006 and as none of us have had a chance to suss out
> what we used to think was our unbeatable route, we will have a tough job
> trying to beat the young guns (well maybe not so young) who have won the
> last two events. But it is a fantastic spring for birds in Victoria this
> year with masses of birds moving in such as Crimson Chats, Budgies,
> trillers, Balck Honeyeaters etc, so this could be one where the Vic
> record could fall. (224 species)
>
>
>
> If anyone would like to sponsor the Bush Turkeys contact me on this
> email address or on Twitter where apparently you put  AT Twitchathon before
> your message. All funds raised this year go to BA VicGroups bird study
> grants, providing vital funds for research into our local birds.
>
>
>
> Good luck to the other teams, I hope you have a safe and bird-filled
> race.
>
>
>
> Sean (Captain Turk) Dooley
>
>
>
>
>
> ===============================
> www.birding-aus.org
> birding-aus.blogspot.com
>
> To unsubscribe from this mailing list,
> send the message:
> unsubscribe
> (in the body of the message, with no Subject line)
> to: birding-aus-request AT vicnet.net.au ===============================
>
> ===============================
> www.birding-aus.org
> birding-aus.blogspot.com
>
> To unsubscribe from this mailing list,
> send the message:
> unsubscribe
> (in the body of the message, with no Subject line)
> to: birding-aus-request AT vicnet.net.au
> ===============================
>
===============================
www.birding-aus.org
birding-aus.blogspot.com

To unsubscribe from this mailing list, 
send the message:
unsubscribe 
(in the body of the message, with no Subject line)
to: birding-aus-request AT vicnet.net.au
===============================
Subject: RE: One birder tackles the technology- Twitchathon onTwitter
From: "Tony Russell" <pratincole AT esc.net.au>
Date: Fri, 6 Nov 2009 09:03:19 +1030
Aha ! So that's the twitter website. I wondered how to access it.
Thanks Dools.

T.

-----Original Message-----
From: birding-aus-bounces AT vicnet.net.au
[mailto:birding-aus-bounces AT vicnet.net.au] On Behalf Of Sean Dooley
Sent: Friday, November 06, 2009 7:24 AM
To: birding-aus AT vicnet.net.au
Subject: [Birding-Aus] One birder tackles the technology- Twitchathon
onTwitter


Inspired by the discussion on how technology can be used by birders, I
have decided to attempt to put the attempt of our twitchathon team (The
Bush
Turkeys) to win this year's Victorian race on Twitter. Being a rather
late adapter of new technology (I still don't trust them fancy, new
fangled smoke
signals!) this could be a bit of a disaster, particularly as for much of
the race I thin kwe will be out of range for me to send any tweets. 

 

But if anyone wants to follow us, check out
http://twitter.com/Twitchathon for hopefully live updates on how we are
going. Members of the Bush Turkeys have been involved in the Thon from
the very first Twitchathon and the team has existed since 1989 and have
competed as a team ten times previously managing to win four times. We
haven't raced since 2006 and as none of us have had a chance to suss out
what we used to think was our unbeatable route, we will have a tough job
trying to beat the young guns (well maybe not so young) who have won the
last two events. But it is a fantastic spring for birds in Victoria this
year with masses of birds moving in such as Crimson Chats, Budgies,
trillers, Balck Honeyeaters etc, so this could be one where the Vic
record could fall. (224 species)

 

If anyone would like to sponsor the Bush Turkeys contact me on this
email address or on Twitter where apparently you put  AT Twitchathon before
your message. All funds raised this year go to BA VicGroups bird study
grants, providing vital funds for research into our local birds.

 

Good luck to the other teams, I hope you have a safe and bird-filled
race.

 

Sean (Captain Turk) Dooley

 

 

===============================
www.birding-aus.org
birding-aus.blogspot.com

To unsubscribe from this mailing list, 
send the message:
unsubscribe 
(in the body of the message, with no Subject line)
to: birding-aus-request AT vicnet.net.au ===============================

===============================
www.birding-aus.org
birding-aus.blogspot.com

To unsubscribe from this mailing list, 
send the message:
unsubscribe 
(in the body of the message, with no Subject line)
to: birding-aus-request AT vicnet.net.au
===============================
Subject: Papua New Guinea Visit Report No. 3
From: "Lisa & Dominic" <lisa01 AT activ8.net.au>
Date: Fri, 6 Nov 2009 07:48:00 +1000
Papua New Guinea - 3 Short Trips

In June, August and in October I was involved in 3 independant birding trips to 
Papua New Guinea 

from Cairns

Trip 1 June, 2009 Varirata/Kiunga/Kama/Kumul Lodge/Brown River/PAU/RabaulTrip 2 
August, 2009 Madang/Keki LodgeTrip 3 October, 2009 PAU/Varirata/Brown 
River/TariStarting backwards, this is the report of the third trip. If anyone 
is interested please click below.It is moderately long, but may have 
interesting moments, in particular some observations of changesat the once 
classic world birding destination, Tari, in the Southern Highlands.For report 
text onlyhttp://www.surfbirds.com/trip_report.php?id=1712For report with 
imageshttp://www.pinecreekpictures.com.au/png5Dominic Chaplin,Cairns, QLD 


==============================www.birding-aus.org
birding-aus.blogspot.com

To unsubscribe from this mailing list,
send the message:
unsubscribe
(in the body of the message, with no Subject line)
to: birding-aus-request AT vicnet.net.au
==============================
Subject: Rare Bird Alert Website
From: Luke Shelley <ldshelle AT gmail.com>
Date: Fri, 6 Nov 2009 08:19:34 +1100
Hear, hear Simon! Precisely the point I was trying to make in my first post
on the topic (although I do apologise for the long winded email, and
therefore understand if my message was lost!). What a wonderful conversation
this is turning out to be! It is fantastic to see that so many people have
thoughts on this, and am really pleased with what people are putting
forward.

Yes, thus far the focus has been on Rare Bird Alerts, but I think there is
far more to it than that. I think there is a real opportunity here to put
something together that serves more than just a real-time alert system. A
central website that provides information on how to get into birding, advice
on binoculars, where you can find birds, maps, lists, the ability to join
discussion groups, share your lists, announce upcoming events, upload
surveys etc etc.

I can understand that many people are going to respond by saying that we
don't need it - and perhaps those people don't. But consider this:

Bird research and conservation relies very heavily on the commitment of
volunteer birders. Organisations such as BOCA and BA also rely on annual
financial membership from the same people. To date, the means we have to
communicate have been sufficient to gather the information required on
birding. However, the next generation of birders are currently growing up
with mobile phones, laptop computers, the internet, Twitter, Facebook,
Playstations, X-Box etc etc. How is birding going to compete against all of
that? These users will come to expect a certain standard of how the
information is presented to them, which means that we need to create
something that meets those expectations, yet still retains all of the
features and content we currently have.

I am not advocating that we redesign everything just for the sake of future
generations. I am taking on board everyone's comments, especially those who
are saying that we don't need such a system. To me, this just highlights the
fact that we need to use the new technology (the internet) in such a way as
to cater for the current users, and for future generations.

I think there are enough people interested in this to perhaps think about
taking this 'offline' (that is, take the discussion out of this forum).
Would anyone be interested in forming a group to discuss some ideas? Perhaps
we could put something together as a group, and then report back to the
Birding-Aus website for comment? I would really like to get the
administrators/moderators of the current suite of websites involved as well.

-- 
Luke
===============================
www.birding-aus.org
birding-aus.blogspot.com

To unsubscribe from this mailing list, 
send the message:
unsubscribe 
(in the body of the message, with no Subject line)
to: birding-aus-request AT vicnet.net.au
===============================
Subject: Birds Australia Rarities Committee website
From: Birds Australia Southern Queensland <basq AT birdsaustralia.com.au>
Date: Fri, 06 Nov 2009 06:18:23 +1000
http://www.tonypalliser.com/barc/barc-home.html

-- 

Regards
Grahame Rogers
Secretary, Birds Australia Southern Queensland
PO Box 224, Crows Nest, Qld, 4355
www.basq.org.au

===============================
www.birding-aus.org
birding-aus.blogspot.com

To unsubscribe from this mailing list, 
send the message:
unsubscribe 
(in the body of the message, with no Subject line)
to: birding-aus-request AT vicnet.net.au
===============================
Subject: One birder tackles the technology- Twitchathon on Twitter
From: "Sean Dooley" <sdooley AT bigpond.net.au>
Date: Fri, 6 Nov 2009 07:54:23 +1100
Inspired by the discussion on how technology can be used by birders, I have
decided to attempt to put the attempt of our twitchathon team (The Bush
Turkeys) to win this year's Victorian race on Twitter. Being a rather late
adapter of new technology (I still don't trust them fancy, new fangled smoke
signals!) this could be a bit of a disaster, particularly as for much of the
race I thin kwe will be out of range for me to send any tweets. 

 

But if anyone wants to follow us, check out http://twitter.com/Twitchathon
for hopefully live updates on how we are going. Members of the Bush Turkeys
have been involved in the Thon from the very first Twitchathon and the team
has existed since 1989 and have competed as a team ten times previously
managing to win four times. We haven't raced since 2006 and as none of us
have had a chance to suss out what we used to think was our unbeatable
route, we will have a tough job trying to beat the young guns (well maybe
not so young) who have won the last two events. But it is a fantastic spring
for birds in Victoria this year with masses of birds moving in such as
Crimson Chats, Budgies, trillers, Balck Honeyeaters etc, so this could be
one where the Vic record could fall. (224 species)

 

If anyone would like to sponsor the Bush Turkeys contact me on this email
address or on Twitter where apparently you put  AT Twitchathon before your
message. All funds raised this year go to BA VicGroups bird study grants,
providing vital funds for research into our local birds.

 

Good luck to the other teams, I hope you have a safe and bird-filled race.

 

Sean (Captain Turk) Dooley

 

 

===============================
www.birding-aus.org
birding-aus.blogspot.com

To unsubscribe from this mailing list, 
send the message:
unsubscribe 
(in the body of the message, with no Subject line)
to: birding-aus-request AT vicnet.net.au
===============================
Subject: Re: Rare Bird Alert Website
From: Gary Wright <gary.wright.email AT gmail.com>
Date: Thu, 5 Nov 2009 20:46:00 +1030
I'm with Tony, use Birding-aus and dodge the mobile phone and keep your
brain intact without the electromagnetic radiation and save a lot of money.

Gary

2009/11/5 Tony Russell 

> What's Twitter and Facebook and Web 2.0 apps ??  I still don't use a
> mobile phone - too much to have to carry around (and expensive? ). Just
> watch birding-aus for all the info required.
>
> Tony.
> .
>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: birding-aus-bounces AT vicnet.net.au
> [mailto:birding-aus-bounces AT vicnet.net.au] On Behalf Of John Leonard
> Sent: Thursday, November 05, 2009 8:47 AM
> To: Birding-aus
> Subject: Re: [Birding-Aus] Rare Bird Alert Website
>
>
> I think keep it simple, remember that a lot of old fogeys like myself
> haven't caught up with Web 2.0 apps like Twitter and Facebook.
>
> A susbscription web-page with a feed. New reports are posted at the top
> with all the details and contacts.
>
> What could be simpler?
>
> John Leonard
>
> 2009/11/4 Rosemary Royle :
> > Thanks Luke for such an excellent and thoughtful post - it certainly
> > helped me understand how tools like Twitter could be sensibly
> > exploited.
> >
> > Rosemary.
> >  ----- Original Message -----
> >  From: Luke Shelley
> >  To: Birding Aus
> >  Sent: Wednesday, November 04, 2009 10:52 AM
> >  Subject: [Birding-Aus] Rare Bird Alert Website
> >
> >
> >  Great to see some good conversations recently on the subject of
> > birding
> >  internet sites, and new online tools for birding. Interesting to note
> is
> >  that Twitter did not seem to feature in the recent conversation
> regarding
> >  the *Rare Bird Alert Website*, yet it is probably the best suited
> (and by
> >  that I mean the technology, and not the brand name itself) to meet
> the
> >  seemingly increasing demands of 'real-time' mass communication of
> bird
> >  sightings. The following is an email to Birding-Aus that I intended
> to post
> >  last week in response to the *Birdlines on Twitter* discussion, but
> it is
> >  related to the current discussion on *Rare Bird Alert Websites*:
> >
> >  Social Networking (the umbrella that covers Twitter, Facebook,
> > MySpace etc)
> >  might appear to be a relatively new thing, but in fact they are just
> tools
> >  for online networking. This website, and a number of other locally
> produced
> >  birding websites, are also prime examples of Social Networking.
> Birders have
> >  been doing it for years.
> >
> >  It is inevitable that birders will eventually make the transition to
> > using
> >  these tools. Why? Because they are tailored perfectly (well, almost
> >  perfectly) to what we already do, but they will enhance and enrich
> our
> >  experience. One other reason that this form of communication is
> inevitable
> >  is that young people of today are brought up with this medium for
> >  communication, and they use it everyday. By that, I mean that they
> have a
> >  standard way that they expect to receive information.
> >
> >  It is interesting to note some of the comments regarding the
> > introduction of
> >  Birdlines to Twitter, "clutter" being one of them. I agree that it
> seems
> >  like clutter with all of the new online tools and mobile apps that
> are
> >  pushed upon us. I also agree that they are somewhat prohibitive given
> the
> >  cost, but that will change (or at least come down) over time.
> However, from
> >  the perspective of the next and future generation of birders,
> "clutter"
> >  would be a word they would use to describe this very website, and a
> number
> >  of others that are commonly used by birders in Australia. That is
> purely
> >  because these websites are not presented in a way that a reader can
> quickly
> >  and easily gather the information they want. The new world wants the
> answer,
> >  and they want it right away, with minimum effort.
> >
> >  Lets look at a couple of examples of where these new tools can
> > enhance what
> >  we currently do in the birding world:
> >  1. The use of birdlines
> >  Scenario 1 (Current): A birder goes out to the WTP for day. During
> the day
> >  the birder passes a number of other birders, waving as they go by, as
> they
> >  do not really know these people. The following day the birder is
> looking at
> >  Birdline, and notices that someone has posted a sighting of a Ruff.
> The
> >  birder is disappointed as they did not see the Ruff.
> >  Scenario 2 (Future): A birder goes out to the WTP for a day. The
> birder is a
> >  subscriber to the new Birdline Twitter feed. Whilst at the plant the
> birder
> >  receives a live Twitter update that there is a Ruff at the Borrow
> Pits. The
> >  birder quickly drives down there, and meets with the other birder who
> just
> >  posted the sighting only minutes earlier. The birder now has a new
> tick, and
> >  a new friend.
> >
> >  2. Twitching amongst specific groups
> >  Scenario 1 (Current): A Blue-and-White Flycatcher turns up in Broome.
>
> > One
> >  particular high profile twitcher is telephoned by someone in Broome,
> and he
> >  has packed his bags and is on his way. This twitcher has about a
> dozen
> >  friends who would also be interested in seeing this bird, so he calls
> them
> >  on his mobile, one by one. Who does he call first?
> >  Scenario 2 (Future): A Blue-and-White Flycatcher turns up in Broome.
> One
> >  particular high profile twitcher is telephoned by someone in Broome,
> and he
> >  has packed his bags and is on his way. This twitcher has about a
> dozen
> >  friends who would also be interested in seeing this bird, and he
> wants to
> >  let them all know at once, but doesn't particularly want to post the
> site on
> >  the website so everyone can see. Fortunately the twitcher and his
> friends
> >  have established a closed network so that they can only see each
> others
> >  posts, and no-one else can see the posts. The twitcher posts to his
> network,
> >  and all of his fellow twitchers receive the sighting instantly, all
> at the
> >  same time. They are all on their way, and will probably all arrive at
> the
> >  same time.
> >
> >  I think the new social networking tools are great, but in their
> > current form
> >  they are not ideal. As birders, we need to shape them into tools that
> are
> >  useful for what we love doing most: birding!
> >
> >  *End of original email*
> >  *
> >  *
> >  With regards to the latest discussion on Rare Bird Alert Websites, I
> > would
> >  like to bring up a couple of extra points, along the same lines as
> above.
> >
> >  Firstly, there appears to be an assumption that the users of such
> > websites
> >  are only after rare or unusual sightings - I believe that this is not
> >  entirely true. Speaking for myself, being a novice birder I use the
> websites
> >  not only to find rare birds, but also to pick up reasonably common or
> >  seasonal birds that I do not yet have on my list. By creating a
> website that
> >  only posts sightings of rare birds (subjectively), we are restricting
> the
> >  use of the site, and limiting the possibilities of what the site can
> become.
> >  A far better way would be to base postings on user defined choices,
> or
> >  automated rules through coding. Sooner or later birding websites are
> going
> >  to become so inundated that manual moderation of the site will become
> almost
> >  impossible. It would be very easy to code in specific rules that
> >  automatically moderate a website so that particular species or
> locations
> >  would or would not be shown. Along with modern day geographic
> information
> >  systems (GIS), this could easily become spatially based rules as
> well. Any
> >  sightings that 'break the rules' so to speak could then be flagged
> for
> >  manual moderation.
> >
> >  Secondly, the real power of any of these websites is in the
> > contributors. I
> >  have seen some nice looking birding websites out there, but they are
> not
> >  currently successful because they do not have a wealth of
> contribution that
> >  some of the other sites have. I believe this comes down to
> 'usability',
> >  which relates to my comment of 'clutter' in my initial email above.
> There is
> >  currently also the issue of all of these different tools and websites
> on
> >  offer that are not in one central location.
> >
> >  For those of you that are keen, do some searching on "Web 2.0" on the
> >  internet (Wikipedia is a good start). Next time you visit your
> > favourite
> >  birding website, ask yourself these questions:
> >  What is it I want to do?
> >  What do I have to do to do it? (i.e. what are the steps involved, how
> many
> >  clicks does it take to get there, how easy is it to do)
> >  How is the information displayed? Can you think of better ways? Or is
> this
> >  display perfect as it is?
> >  How long does it take to display in this way? Are maps too slow?
> >  What ways would you like to display or filter the information in your
> own
> >  way?
> >
> >  The more of us that write down these ideas, the more we can formulate
>
> > them
> >  into a 'business case' and present them to the current website
> owners, or
> >  indeed to a budding new website designer. I have plenty of ideas I
> have
> >  already put on paper, and I would be more than willing to discuss
> them with
> >  anyone here. They range from ways to mass communicate (e.g. twitter
> etc), to
> >  social networks for creating and sharing bird lists, events etc (e.g.
> >  Facebook etc), all the way to submitting survey and Atlas records.
> The
> >  possibilities are endless.
> >
> >  I see our birding websites, including this one, as more than just a
> > place to
> >  post and discuss rare bird sightings. I see them as a gateway to the
> great
> >  pastime of birding, for novices and veterans alike, and the more we
> come to
> >  realise that, the many more people will come to enjoy birding both
> now and
> >  into the future.
> >
> >  Regards,
> >
> >  Luke
> >  ===============================
> >  www.birding-aus.org
> >  birding-aus.blogspot.com
> >
> >  To unsubscribe from this mailing list,
> >  send the message:
> >  unsubscribe
> >  (in the body of the message, with no Subject line)
> >  to: birding-aus-request AT vicnet.net.au
> >  ===============================
> >
> >
> > ----------------------------------------------------------------------
> > --------
> >
> >
> >
> >  No virus found in this incoming message.
> >  Checked by AVG - www.avg.com
> >  Version: 8.5.424 / Virus Database: 270.14.48/2479 - Release Date:
> > 11/03/09 19:38:00 www.birding-aus.org birding-aus.blogspot.com
> >
> > To unsubscribe from this mailing list,
> > send the message:
> > unsubscribe
> > (in the body of the message, with no Subject line)
> > to: birding-aus-request AT vicnet.net.au
> >
>
>
>
> --
> John Leonard
> Canberra
> Australia
> www.jleonard.net
>
> "I rejoice that there are owls." Thoreau ==========www.birding-aus.org
> birding-aus.blogspot.com
>
> To unsubscribe from this mailing list,
> send the message:
> unsubscribe
> (in the body of the message, with no Subject line)
> to: birding-aus-request AT vicnet.net.au
> ===========
>
> www.birding-aus.org
> birding-aus.blogspot.com
>
> To unsubscribe from this mailing list,
> send the message:
> unsubscribe
> (in the body of the message, with no Subject line)
> to: birding-aus-request AT vicnet.net.au
>
===============================
www.birding-aus.org
birding-aus.blogspot.com

To unsubscribe from this mailing list, 
send the message:
unsubscribe 
(in the body of the message, with no Subject line)
to: birding-aus-request AT vicnet.net.au
===============================
Subject: Re: Hall's Babbler Fowler's Gap
From: "Tim Dolby" <Tim.Dolby AT vu.edu.au>
Date: Thu, 5 Nov 2009 22:26:57 +1100
Hi Peter,

I'm not sure about Fowler's Gap Research Station, but they are found nearby at 
Mutawintji (Mootwingee) National Park, 130 km nth of Broken Hill. Restricted to 
the gorge systems of Mutawintji (such as Amphitheatre Gorge), they are also 
present within the restricted northern area of the park. They are also recorded 
recently around the township of Brewarrina, east of Mutawintji. 


Hall's Babbler is listed in the 'Birds of the Milparinka District and Cooper 
Creek Basin' (which incorporates Fowler's Gap) by E Wyndham, Emu 78 (4) 179 - 
187. Perhaps this is where you saw your reference to Fowler's Gap? 


Really interested to hear if any other records turn up in the area Peter.

Cheers,

Tim Dolby

_______________________________

Hi birders,

I recently came across a mention of Hall's Babbler for the Fowlers Gap
Research Station in far-western NSW (north of Broken Hill). Does
anyone know if they're actually present at this location? Has anyone
been there?

cheers

Peter




This email, including any attachment, is intended solely for the use of the 
intended recipient. It is confidential and may contain personal information or 
be subject to legal professional privilege. If you are not the intended 
recipient any use, disclosure, reproduction or storage of it is unauthorised. 
If you have received this email in error, please advise the sender via return 
email and delete it from your system immediately. Victoria University does not 
warrant that this email is free from viruses or defects and accepts no 
liability for any damage caused by such viruses or defects. 

==============================www.birding-aus.org
birding-aus.blogspot.com

To unsubscribe from this mailing list,
send the message:
unsubscribe
(in the body of the message, with no Subject line)
to: birding-aus-request AT vicnet.net.au
==============================
Subject: rare bird alerts
From: "Pat OMalley" <P.Omalley AT usyd.edu.au>
Date: Thu, 5 Nov 2009 22:33:15 +1100
One way of facilitating rare bird alerts would be to get the publishers of 
field guides to put a little section up front mentioning sites like B-Aus as 
outlets for alerts. 

 
But the problem immediately becomes apparent - very likely many false alarms 
from inexperienced birders. Then the accurate reports get lost in the crowd and 
only a few sources would be trusted. So we'd be pretty much back where we are 
now, but with a lot of extra noise. 

 
Cheers
Pat
==============================www.birding-aus.org
birding-aus.blogspot.com

To unsubscribe from this mailing list,
send the message:
unsubscribe
(in the body of the message, with no Subject line)
to: birding-aus-request AT vicnet.net.au
==============================
Subject: Tahiti Petrel and Black-bellied Stormie Photos
From: Simon Mustoe <simonmustoe AT hotmail.com>
Date: Thu, 5 Nov 2009 11:28:25 +0000
Some great images by Chris Sanderson 
http://aussiebirding.wildiaries.com/trips/188 


I haven't seen Tahiti Petrel shots this good before. Maybe I should get up and 
spend some time on the Southport Pelagics. Would be good to get away from this 
cold Melbourne weather...5 degrees forecast tonight!! 


Simon.
 		 	   		  
_________________________________________________________________
Chat to your friends for free on selected mobiles

http://clk.atdmt.com/UKM/go/174426567/direct/01/==============================www.birding-aus.org 

birding-aus.blogspot.com

To unsubscribe from this mailing list,
send the message:
unsubscribe
(in the body of the message, with no Subject line)
to: birding-aus-request AT vicnet.net.au
==============================
Subject: RE: Rare Bird Alerts Data Capture
From: "Tony Russell" <pratincole AT esc.net.au>
Date: Thu, 5 Nov 2009 21:38:12 +1030
Hi Rosemary, 

Eek !! , 40 miles is only 66.7 km. I go further than that for my
shopping each week.  Just kidding, I go about 3km.

We also have mobile coverage problems too in some of the remote areas -
that's if there's any credit left on the SIMCARD.

Tony.

-----Original Message-----
From: birding-aus-bounces AT vicnet.net.au
[mailto:birding-aus-bounces AT vicnet.net.au] On Behalf Of Rosemary Royle
Sent: Thursday, November 05, 2009 8:51 PM
To: birding-aus
Subject: Re: [Birding-Aus] Rare Bird Alerts Data Capture


Another two-penneth from the UK. 

One small point which is worth thinking about - the types of rarities in
the UK differ somewhat from those in Australia. Many rarities in the UK
only hang around for very short periods - basically they are lost and
are trying to be somewhere else. After a feed and a rest they are off
again. Or in many cases they probably just die. They are also often in
difficult-to-access places such as northern Scottish islands. So speed
and immediacy are of the essence. 

As far as I can tell most rarities in Australia hang around for a while
(though not quite long enough - we looked for the Burren Junction
Lapwing about 3 days after it was last seen!) so a web based or email
system is potentially all that is needed. And also the core group of
Twitchers is much smaller so they can still use the good old telephone
should a mega-important thing turn up. I also think a completely
unmoderated system such as Twitter could be useful - the group concerned
is quite small and potentially would know each other so it would be up
to each user to decide whether they can rely on the information being
supplied. But the mobile phone coverage issue can't be ignored. 

PS We only twitch things in Pembrokeshire (max 40 miles Tony) and only
then reluctantly, and they have usually gone by the time we get there!
And we can't use mobile phones either as we have no coverage where we
live!

Rosemary Royle
Wales, UK
  ----- Original Message ----- 
  From: Richard Baxter 
  To: birding-aus 
  Cc: Richard BAXTER 
  Sent: Thursday, November 05, 2009 1:19 AM
  Subject: [Birding-Aus] Rare Bird Alerts Data Capture




  Hello Birders,
  Personally I don't have a great problem with the current methods of
disseminating data in relation to rarity sightings. In most cases, the
information gets through relatively quickly, whether its phone call,
text, birding-aus or eremaea etc. 

  I admit receiving sighting details in real-time would be great but my
biggest issue is not the receiving of information but the CAPTURE of
information.

  We have to have the sighting information before we can send it out to
the masses. The single most frustrating element of twitching is
obviously dipping and I've lost count of the number of rarities that
have been reported, days and often over a week after they were first
seen. 

  The question is: How do we make it easy for people to report their
sightings?

  The reality is that only a very small percentage of people birding in
Australia are on Birding-Aus and even fewer have ever heard of Eremaea.
Most don't know who or what to ring and therefore many sightings go
unreported. 

  There are many examples.

  1. Grey-headed Lapwing. Not reported on B-Aus until days after the
initial sighting, Why?

  2. Last year I dropped into a remote property near Broome and was
talking to the owner, an old bloke, who had built a rain forest in his
backyard. He told me he had seen Blue and White Flycatcher and
Red-legged Crake in recent years at the pond near his back door!
  I said," Did you let anyone know, they're pretty interesting birds to
see?" He said," I wouldn't know who to tell, mate."

  3. A couple of years ago I twitched a bird that had been reported on
B-Aus and dipped. Whilst at the location I ran into the bloke that found
the bird and ascertained it had arrived 10 days ago and hadn't been seen
for the last two days. I asked him why he didn't tell someone sooner and
he said," I didn't know who to tell, I've only ever met one serious
birdwatcher and that was some bloke from Melbourne, 20yrs ago."

  There are thousands of people out there birding everyday, the same
thousands that are buying the thousands of field guides each year from
bookshops. 

  Q. A grey nomad sitting in front of his caravan looking over the lake
in Kununurra sees a Grey Heron land on the bank 30m away. He checks his
field guide and reads that Grey Heron is very rare in Australia. He's
not an avid birder, hasn't got the internet in his van and knows no keen
birders to ring. How does he tell anyone about the sighting??

  How do we capture these sightings to put on rare bird alerts?


  Cheers
  Richard Baxter
















 
________________________________________________________________________
__________
  Win 1 of 4 Sony home entertainment packs thanks to Yahoo!7.
  Enter now: http://au.docs.yahoo.com/homepageset/
  ==========www.birding-aus.org
  birding-aus.blogspot.com

  To unsubscribe from this mailing list, 
  send the message:
  unsubscribe 
  (in the body of the message, with no Subject line)
  to: birding-aus-request AT vicnet.net.au
  ===========


------------------------------------------------------------------------
------



  No virus found in this incoming message.
  Checked by AVG - www.avg.com 
  Version: 8.5.424 / Virus Database: 270.14.50/2481 - Release Date:
11/04/09 19:51:00 ==========www.birding-aus.org birding-aus.blogspot.com

To unsubscribe from this mailing list, 
send the message:
unsubscribe 
(in the body of the message, with no Subject line)
to: birding-aus-request AT vicnet.net.au
===========

===============================
www.birding-aus.org
birding-aus.blogspot.com

To unsubscribe from this mailing list, 
send the message:
unsubscribe 
(in the body of the message, with no Subject line)
to: birding-aus-request AT vicnet.net.au
===============================
Subject: RE: Rare Bird Alerts Data Capture
From: Simon Mustoe <simonmustoe AT hotmail.com>
Date: Thu, 5 Nov 2009 10:55:07 +0000
Interesting points Rosemary.

I'd be keen to hear the views of birding-aussies on the growth of birding in 
Australia over the last few years. Rosemary, you may have a view on the similar 
growth in birding in the UK during the 1990s. I started twitching the UK in 
about 1993. At that time, Birdline was still the main news line and was a 
premium rate 50p/min phone number with recorded messages. Pagers only came in a 
year or two later and although I attended some massive twitches, in those days 
the numbers weren't that great. As far as I can recall, birding became 
'mainstream' in the UK only during the 1990s and the growth was astounding. Was 
this anything to do with Birdline and pagers? 


This brings me to my point.

In Australia, the distances are indeed huge and in fact many of the 'rarities' 
are actually resident birds. One of the problems is trying to get up to date 
information or even finding out exactly where to see things. I wonder whether 
there are far more 'potential' birders out there than we realise. It's a great 
hobby but I think I would have really struggled to get into it, if I had had to 
learn birding from scratch when arriving in Australia in 2001. A lot of what we 
take for granted is not necessarily apparent to the wider population of 
Australia. I wonder whether, an effort to make birds more accessible, would see 
a much greater number of people taking up birding. There are various ways to do 
this but at the heart of these discussions, is the desire to have a more 
comprehensive environment for reporting "rarities". 


If the birding community can get the formula right, perhaps there is scope for 
a far greater commitment to birding and bird conservation in Australia. 


Regards,

Simon.




> From: rosemaryroyle AT tiscali.co.uk
> To: birding-aus AT vicnet.net.au
> Subject: Re: [Birding-Aus] Rare Bird Alerts Data Capture
> Date: Thu, 5 Nov 2009 10:20:34 +0000
> 
> Another two-penneth from the UK. 
> 
> One small point which is worth thinking about - the types of rarities in the 
UK differ somewhat from those in Australia. Many rarities in the UK only hang 
around for very short periods - basically they are lost and are trying to be 
somewhere else. After a feed and a rest they are off again. Or in many cases 
they probably just die. They are also often in difficult-to-access places such 
as northern Scottish islands. So speed and immediacy are of the essence. 

> 
> As far as I can tell most rarities in Australia hang around for a while 
(though not quite long enough - we looked for the Burren Junction Lapwing about 
3 days after it was last seen!) so a web based or email system is potentially 
all that is needed. And also the core group of Twitchers is much smaller so 
they can still use the good old telephone should a mega-important thing turn 
up. I also think a completely unmoderated system such as Twitter could be 
useful - the group concerned is quite small and potentially would know each 
other so it would be up to each user to decide whether they can rely on the 
information being supplied. But the mobile phone coverage issue can't be 
ignored. 

> 
> PS We only twitch things in Pembrokeshire (max 40 miles Tony) and only then 
reluctantly, and they have usually gone by the time we get there! And we can't 
use mobile phones either as we have no coverage where we live! 

> 
> Rosemary Royle
> Wales, UK
>   ----- Original Message ----- 
>   From: Richard Baxter 
>   To: birding-aus 
>   Cc: Richard BAXTER 
>   Sent: Thursday, November 05, 2009 1:19 AM
>   Subject: [Birding-Aus] Rare Bird Alerts Data Capture
> 
> 
> 
> 
>   Hello Birders,
> Personally I don't have a great problem with the current methods of 
disseminating data in relation to rarity sightings. In most cases, the 
information gets through relatively quickly, whether its phone call, text, 
birding-aus or eremaea etc. 

> 
> I admit receiving sighting details in real-time would be great but my biggest 
issue is not the receiving of information but the CAPTURE of information. 

> 
> We have to have the sighting information before we can send it out to the 
masses. The single most frustrating element of twitching is obviously dipping 
and I've lost count of the number of rarities that have been reported, days and 
often over a week after they were first seen. 

> 
> The question is: How do we make it easy for people to report their sightings? 

> 
> The reality is that only a very small percentage of people birding in 
Australia are on Birding-Aus and even fewer have ever heard of Eremaea. Most 
don't know who or what to ring and therefore many sightings go unreported. 

> 
>   There are many examples.
> 
> 1. Grey-headed Lapwing. Not reported on B-Aus until days after the initial 
sighting, Why? 

> 
> 2. Last year I dropped into a remote property near Broome and was talking to 
the owner, an old bloke, who had built a rain forest in his backyard. He told 
me he had seen Blue and White Flycatcher and Red-legged Crake in recent years 
at the pond near his back door! 

> I said," Did you let anyone know, they're pretty interesting birds to see?" 
He said," I wouldn't know who to tell, mate." 

> 
> 3. A couple of years ago I twitched a bird that had been reported on B-Aus 
and dipped. Whilst at the location I ran into the bloke that found the bird and 
ascertained it had arrived 10 days ago and hadn't been seen for the last two 
days. I asked him why he didn't tell someone sooner and he said," I didn't know 
who to tell, I've only ever met one serious birdwatcher and that was some bloke 
from Melbourne, 20yrs ago." 

> 
> There are thousands of people out there birding everyday, the same thousands 
that are buying the thousands of field guides each year from bookshops. 

> 
> Q. A grey nomad sitting in front of his caravan looking over the lake in 
Kununurra sees a Grey Heron land on the bank 30m away. He checks his field 
guide and reads that Grey Heron is very rare in Australia. He's not an avid 
birder, hasn't got the internet in his van and knows no keen birders to ring. 
How does he tell anyone about the sighting?? 

> 
>   How do we capture these sightings to put on rare bird alerts?
> 
> 
>   Cheers
>   Richard Baxter
> 
> 
> 
> 
> 
> 
> 
> 
> 
> 
> 
> 
> 
> 
> 
> 
> 
__________________________________________________________________________________ 

>   Win 1 of 4 Sony home entertainment packs thanks to Yahoo!7.
>   Enter now: http://au.docs.yahoo.com/homepageset/
>   ==========www.birding-aus.org
>   birding-aus.blogspot.com
> 
>   To unsubscribe from this mailing list, 
>   send the message:
>   unsubscribe 
>   (in the body of the message, with no Subject line)
>   to: birding-aus-request AT vicnet.net.au
>   ===========
> 
> 
> 
------------------------------------------------------------------------------ 

> 
> 
> 
>   No virus found in this incoming message.
>   Checked by AVG - www.avg.com 
> Version: 8.5.424 / Virus Database: 270.14.50/2481 - Release Date: 11/04/09 
19:51:00 

> ==========www.birding-aus.org
> birding-aus.blogspot.com
> 
> To unsubscribe from this mailing list, 
> send the message:
> unsubscribe 
> (in the body of the message, with no Subject line)
> to: birding-aus-request AT vicnet.net.au
> ==========
 		 	   		  
_________________________________________________________________
Download Messenger onto your mobile for free

http://clk.atdmt.com/UKM/go/174426567/direct/01/==============================www.birding-aus.org 

birding-aus.blogspot.com

To unsubscribe from this mailing list,
send the message:
unsubscribe
(in the body of the message, with no Subject line)
to: birding-aus-request AT vicnet.net.au
==============================
Subject: Re: Rare Bird Alerts Data Capture
From: "Rosemary Royle" <rosemaryroyle AT tiscali.co.uk>
Date: Thu, 5 Nov 2009 10:20:34 -0000
Another two-penneth from the UK. 

One small point which is worth thinking about - the types of rarities in the UK 
differ somewhat from those in Australia. Many rarities in the UK only hang 
around for very short periods - basically they are lost and are trying to be 
somewhere else. After a feed and a rest they are off again. Or in many cases 
they probably just die. They are also often in difficult-to-access places such 
as northern Scottish islands. So speed and immediacy are of the essence. 


As far as I can tell most rarities in Australia hang around for a while (though 
not quite long enough - we looked for the Burren Junction Lapwing about 3 days 
after it was last seen!) so a web based or email system is potentially all that 
is needed. And also the core group of Twitchers is much smaller so they can 
still use the good old telephone should a mega-important thing turn up. I also 
think a completely unmoderated system such as Twitter could be useful - the 
group concerned is quite small and potentially would know each other so it 
would be up to each user to decide whether they can rely on the information 
being supplied. But the mobile phone coverage issue can't be ignored. 


PS We only twitch things in Pembrokeshire (max 40 miles Tony) and only then 
reluctantly, and they have usually gone by the time we get there! And we can't 
use mobile phones either as we have no coverage where we live! 


Rosemary Royle
Wales, UK
  ----- Original Message ----- 
  From: Richard Baxter 
  To: birding-aus 
  Cc: Richard BAXTER 
  Sent: Thursday, November 05, 2009 1:19 AM
  Subject: [Birding-Aus] Rare Bird Alerts Data Capture




  Hello Birders,
 Personally I don't have a great problem with the current methods of 
disseminating data in relation to rarity sightings. In most cases, the 
information gets through relatively quickly, whether its phone call, text, 
birding-aus or eremaea etc. 


 I admit receiving sighting details in real-time would be great but my biggest 
issue is not the receiving of information but the CAPTURE of information. 


 We have to have the sighting information before we can send it out to the 
masses. The single most frustrating element of twitching is obviously dipping 
and I've lost count of the number of rarities that have been reported, days and 
often over a week after they were first seen. 


  The question is: How do we make it easy for people to report their sightings?

 The reality is that only a very small percentage of people birding in 
Australia are on Birding-Aus and even fewer have ever heard of Eremaea. Most 
don't know who or what to ring and therefore many sightings go unreported. 


  There are many examples.

 1. Grey-headed Lapwing. Not reported on B-Aus until days after the initial 
sighting, Why? 


 2. Last year I dropped into a remote property near Broome and was talking to 
the owner, an old bloke, who had built a rain forest in his backyard. He told 
me he had seen Blue and White Flycatcher and Red-legged Crake in recent years 
at the pond near his back door! 

 I said," Did you let anyone know, they're pretty interesting birds to see?" He 
said," I wouldn't know who to tell, mate." 


 3. A couple of years ago I twitched a bird that had been reported on B-Aus and 
dipped. Whilst at the location I ran into the bloke that found the bird and 
ascertained it had arrived 10 days ago and hadn't been seen for the last two 
days. I asked him why he didn't tell someone sooner and he said," I didn't know 
who to tell, I've only ever met one serious birdwatcher and that was some bloke 
from Melbourne, 20yrs ago." 


 There are thousands of people out there birding everyday, the same thousands 
that are buying the thousands of field guides each year from bookshops. 


 Q. A grey nomad sitting in front of his caravan looking over the lake in 
Kununurra sees a Grey Heron land on the bank 30m away. He checks his field 
guide and reads that Grey Heron is very rare in Australia. He's not an avid 
birder, hasn't got the internet in his van and knows no keen birders to ring. 
How does he tell anyone about the sighting?? 


  How do we capture these sightings to put on rare bird alerts?


  Cheers
  Richard Baxter
















 
__________________________________________________________________________________ 

  Win 1 of 4 Sony home entertainment packs thanks to Yahoo!7.
  Enter now: http://au.docs.yahoo.com/homepageset/
  ==========www.birding-aus.org
  birding-aus.blogspot.com

  To unsubscribe from this mailing list, 
  send the message:
  unsubscribe 
  (in the body of the message, with no Subject line)
  to: birding-aus-request AT vicnet.net.au
  ===========


------------------------------------------------------------------------------



  No virus found in this incoming message.
  Checked by AVG - www.avg.com 
 Version: 8.5.424 / Virus Database: 270.14.50/2481 - Release Date: 11/04/09 
19:51:00 

==============================www.birding-aus.org
birding-aus.blogspot.com

To unsubscribe from this mailing list,
send the message:
unsubscribe
(in the body of the message, with no Subject line)
to: birding-aus-request AT vicnet.net.au
==============================
Subject: Re: Rare Bird Alert Website
From: Ian May <birding AT ozemail.com.au>
Date: Thu, 05 Nov 2009 19:49:06 +1100
If we pay a bit more can we get rarer birds reported sooner?

John Leonard wrote:

>I think keep it simple, remember that a lot of old fogeys like myself
>haven't caught up with Web 2.0 apps like Twitter and Facebook.
>
>A susbscription web-page with a feed. New reports are posted at the
>top with all the details and contacts.
>
>What could be simpler?
>
>John Leonard
>
>2009/11/4 Rosemary Royle :
>  
>
>>Thanks Luke for such an excellent and thoughtful post - it certainly helped 
me understand how tools like Twitter could be sensibly exploited. 

>>
>>Rosemary.
>> ----- Original Message -----
>> From: Luke Shelley
>> To: Birding Aus
>> Sent: Wednesday, November 04, 2009 10:52 AM
>> Subject: [Birding-Aus] Rare Bird Alert Website
>>
>>
>> Great to see some good conversations recently on the subject of birding
>> internet sites, and new online tools for birding. Interesting to note is
>> that Twitter did not seem to feature in the recent conversation regarding
>> the *Rare Bird Alert Website*, yet it is probably the best suited (and by
>> that I mean the technology, and not the brand name itself) to meet the
>> seemingly increasing demands of 'real-time' mass communication of bird
>> sightings. The following is an email to Birding-Aus that I intended to post
>> last week in response to the *Birdlines on Twitter* discussion, but it is
>> related to the current discussion on *Rare Bird Alert Websites*:
>>
>> Social Networking (the umbrella that covers Twitter, Facebook, MySpace etc)
>> might appear to be a relatively new thing, but in fact they are just tools
>> for online networking. This website, and a number of other locally produced
>> birding websites, are also prime examples of Social Networking. Birders have
>> been doing it for years.
>>
>> It is inevitable that birders will eventually make the transition to using
>> these tools. Why? Because they are tailored perfectly (well, almost
>> perfectly) to what we already do, but they will enhance and enrich our
>> experience. One other reason that this form of communication is inevitable
>> is that young people of today are brought up with this medium for
>> communication, and they use it everyday. By that, I mean that they have a
>> standard way that they expect to receive information.
>>
>> It is interesting to note some of the comments regarding the introduction of
>> Birdlines to Twitter, "clutter" being one of them. I agree that it seems
>> like clutter with all of the new online tools and mobile apps that are
>> pushed upon us. I also agree that they are somewhat prohibitive given the
>> cost, but that will change (or at least come down) over time. However, from
>> the perspective of the next and future generation of birders, "clutter"
>> would be a word they would use to describe this very website, and a number
>> of others that are commonly used by birders in Australia. That is purely
>> because these websites are not presented in a way that a reader can quickly
>> and easily gather the information they want. The new world wants the answer,
>> and they want it right away, with minimum effort.
>>
>> Lets look at a couple of examples of where these new tools can enhance what
>> we currently do in the birding world:
>> 1. The use of birdlines
>> Scenario 1 (Current): A birder goes out to the WTP for day. During the day
>> the birder passes a number of other birders, waving as they go by, as they
>> do not really know these people. The following day the birder is looking at
>> Birdline, and notices that someone has posted a sighting of a Ruff. The
>> birder is disappointed as they did not see the Ruff.
>> Scenario 2 (Future): A birder goes out to the WTP for a day. The birder is a
>> subscriber to the new Birdline Twitter feed. Whilst at the plant the birder
>> receives a live Twitter update that there is a Ruff at the Borrow Pits. The
>> birder quickly drives down there, and meets with the other birder who just
>> posted the sighting only minutes earlier. The birder now has a new tick, and
>> a new friend.
>>
>> 2. Twitching amongst specific groups
>> Scenario 1 (Current): A Blue-and-White Flycatcher turns up in Broome. One
>> particular high profile twitcher is telephoned by someone in Broome, and he
>> has packed his bags and is on his way. This twitcher has about a dozen
>> friends who would also be interested in seeing this bird, so he calls them
>> on his mobile, one by one. Who does he call first?
>> Scenario 2 (Future): A Blue-and-White Flycatcher turns up in Broome. One
>> particular high profile twitcher is telephoned by someone in Broome, and he
>> has packed his bags and is on his way. This twitcher has about a dozen
>> friends who would also be interested in seeing this bird, and he wants to
>> let them all know at once, but doesn't particularly want to post the site on
>> the website so everyone can see. Fortunately the twitcher and his friends
>> have established a closed network so that they can only see each others
>> posts, and no-one else can see the posts. The twitcher posts to his network,
>> and all of his fellow twitchers receive the sighting instantly, all at the
>> same time. They are all on their way, and will probably all arrive at the
>> same time.
>>
>> I think the new social networking tools are great, but in their current form
>> they are not ideal. As birders, we need to shape them into tools that are
>> useful for what we love doing most: birding!
>>
>> *End of original email*
>> *
>> *
>> With regards to the latest discussion on Rare Bird Alert Websites, I would
>> like to bring up a couple of extra points, along the same lines as above.
>>
>> Firstly, there appears to be an assumption that the users of such websites
>> are only after rare or unusual sightings - I believe that this is not
>> entirely true. Speaking for myself, being a novice birder I use the websites
>> not only to find rare birds, but also to pick up reasonably common or
>> seasonal birds that I do not yet have on my list. By creating a website that
>> only posts sightings of rare birds (subjectively), we are restricting the
>> use of the site, and limiting the possibilities of what the site can become.
>> A far better way would be to base postings on user defined choices, or
>> automated rules through coding. Sooner or later birding websites are going
>> to become so inundated that manual moderation of the site will become almost
>> impossible. It would be very easy to code in specific rules that
>> automatically moderate a website so that particular species or locations
>> would or would not be shown. Along with modern day geographic information
>> systems (GIS), this could easily become spatially based rules as well. Any
>> sightings that 'break the rules' so to speak could then be flagged for
>> manual moderation.
>>
>> Secondly, the real power of any of these websites is in the contributors. I
>> have seen some nice looking birding websites out there, but they are not
>> currently successful because they do not have a wealth of contribution that
>> some of the other sites have. I believe this comes down to 'usability',
>> which relates to my comment of 'clutter' in my initial email above. There is
>> currently also the issue of all of these different tools and websites on
>> offer that are not in one central location.
>>
>> For those of you that are keen, do some searching on "Web 2.0" on the
>> internet (Wikipedia is a good start). Next time you visit your favourite
>> birding website, ask yourself these questions:
>> What is it I want to do?
>> What do I have to do to do it? (i.e. what are the steps involved, how many
>> clicks does it take to get there, how easy is it to do)
>> How is the information displayed? Can you think of better ways? Or is this
>> display perfect as it is?
>> How long does it take to display in this way? Are maps too slow?
>> What ways would you like to display or filter the information in your own
>> way?
>>
>> The more of us that write down these ideas, the more we can formulate them
>> into a 'business case' and present them to the current website owners, or
>> indeed to a budding new website designer. I have plenty of ideas I have
>> already put on paper, and I would be more than willing to discuss them with
>> anyone here. They range from ways to mass communicate (e.g. twitter etc), to
>> social networks for creating and sharing bird lists, events etc (e.g.
>> Facebook etc), all the way to submitting survey and Atlas records. The
>> possibilities are endless.
>>
>> I see our birding websites, including this one, as more than just a place to
>> post and discuss rare bird sightings. I see them as a gateway to the great
>> pastime of birding, for novices and veterans alike, and the more we come to
>> realise that, the many more people will come to enjoy birding both now and
>> into the future.
>>
>> Regards,
>>
>> Luke
>> ===============================
>> www.birding-aus.org
>> birding-aus.blogspot.com
>>
>> To unsubscribe from this mailing list,
>> send the message:
>> unsubscribe
>> (in the body of the message, with no Subject line)
>> to: birding-aus-request AT vicnet.net.au
>> ===============================
>>
>>

>>------------------------------------------------------------------------------ 

>>
>>
>>
>> No virus found in this incoming message.
>> Checked by AVG - www.avg.com
>> Version: 8.5.424 / Virus Database: 270.14.48/2479 - Release Date: 11/03/09 
19:38:00 

>>www.birding-aus.org
>>birding-aus.blogspot.com
>>
>>To unsubscribe from this mailing list,
>>send the message:
>>unsubscribe
>>(in the body of the message, with no Subject line)
>>to: birding-aus-request AT vicnet.net.au
>>
>>    
>>
>
>
>
>  
>
>------------------------------------------------------------------------
>
>
>No virus found in this incoming message.
>Checked by AVG - www.avg.com 
>Version: 8.5.424 / Virus Database: 270.14.48/2479 - Release Date: 11/03/09 
19:38:00 

>
>  
>
===============================
www.birding-aus.org
birding-aus.blogspot.com

To unsubscribe from this mailing list, 
send the message:
unsubscribe 
(in the body of the message, with no Subject line)
to: birding-aus-request AT vicnet.net.au
===============================
Subject: Hall's Babbler Fowler's Gap
From: Peter Waanders <waanders.peter AT gmail.com>
Date: Thu, 5 Nov 2009 16:05:04 +1030
Hi birders,

I recently came across a mention of Hall's Babbler for the Fowlers Gap
Research Station in far-western NSW (north of Broken Hill). Does
anyone know if they're actually present at this location? Has anyone
been there?

cheers

Peter
==============================www.birding-aus.org
birding-aus.blogspot.com

To unsubscribe from this mailing list,
send the message:
unsubscribe
(in the body of the message, with no Subject line)
to: birding-aus-request AT vicnet.net.au
==============================
Subject: Black-bellied Storm Petrels off Sydney.
From: "Paul Walbridge" <Paul_Walbridge AT health.qld.gov.au>
Date: Thu, 05 Nov 2009 07:13:29 +1000
Hi All, I've never been quite able to work out how Black-bellied Storm Petrels 
are so rarely seen off Wollongong/Sydney when just a few hundred kilometres to 
the north in SEQ waters one is virtually guaranteed to see them anytime June - 
November. I'm not talking in ones or twos either, up to 33 in a day. Just to 
the south of Wollongong off of Ulladulla (admittedly in very deep water) on two 
October trips in a row we encountered quite large numbers of the species. 
Cheers - Paul W. 

==============================www.birding-aus.org
birding-aus.blogspot.com

To unsubscribe from this mailing list,
send the message:
unsubscribe
(in the body of the message, with no Subject line)
to: birding-aus-request AT vicnet.net.au
==============================
Subject: RE: BARC website
From: "Billinghurst, David (RTATECH)" <David.Billinghurst AT riotinto.com>
Date: Thu, 5 Nov 2009 14:58:53 +1100
> From: Alistair McKeough
> 
> Could somebody point me in the direction of BARC's website. I 
> think it used to be kindly hosted by Tony Palliser on his 
> bigpond, but the link I have seems to be dead.

http://www.tonypalliser.com/barc/barc-home.html

This email is confidential and may also be privileged. If you are not the 
intended recipient, please notify us immediately and delete this message from 
your system without first printing or copying it. Any personal data in this 
email (including any attachments) must be handled in accordance with the Rio 
Tinto Group Data Protection Policy and all applicable data protection laws. 

==============================www.birding-aus.org
birding-aus.blogspot.com

To unsubscribe from this mailing list,
send the message:
unsubscribe
(in the body of the message, with no Subject line)
to: birding-aus-request AT vicnet.net.au
==============================
Subject: Re: Satin-Leaden Flycatchers again
From: Rod Gardner <r.gardner AT griffith.edu.au>
Date: Thu, 5 Nov 2009 13:53:36 +1000
Hi Allan,

Thanks, Allan. It's good to hear from someone who has been trying to work 
out if you can split these two on calls. Your answer is pretty much what I 
suspected - that it's extremely difficult because of the variation in the 
calls of LF (I wouldn't know about SF). One question this raises, though, 
is whether the BOCA calls are reliable. As I said in my original posting, 
the call I heard at Anstead was almost identical to the first call for SF 
on the BOCA recordings. I don't doubt that that recording is of a SF, but 
does anyone know if LF might produce the same call?

Rod





From:
"Allan Richardson" 
To:
, "Rod Gardner" 
Date:
04/11/09 09:18 PM
Subject:
Re: [Birding-Aus] Satin-Leaden Flycatchers again



Hi Rod

In recent years I've been pretty keen to test the calls of SF compared 
with 
LF. And over the past few seasons have tracked down many a variation on 
the 
LF call suspecting that a SF would show itself, only to find LF.  A week 
ago 
I was working on the Newnes Plateau in the western Blue Mountains and 
encountered LF regularly, most deviating from the calls that I am used to 
hearing on the Central Coast where I live. The last flycatcher call I 
encountered during the week sounded very much like a LF, but turned out to 

be a SF. I have heard SF in the past, which sounded different to LF calls, 

but I suspect, from my own experiences, that the variation of call within 
each species may make it hard to draw some general rules of thumb here.

Regards

Allan Richardson


----- Original Message ----- 
From: "Rod Gardner" 
To: 
Sent: Thursday, October 29, 2009 11:14 AM
Subject: [Birding-Aus] Satin-Leaden Flycatchers again


> Following up on the Leaden/Satin Flycatcher thread, I have another
> question about these birds. Leaden Flycatchers are common on my local
> patch in the west of Brisbane, and I’m familiar with their calls. 
Recently
> I heard a call that was Leaden Flycatcher-like, but not one I’d heard
> before. I didn’t get to see the bird, as it was in a densely vegetated
> gully, but recorded the call on a digital voice recorder. When I got 
home
> and checked it with the BOCA recordings, it was pretty much identical to
> the first calls of the Satin Flycatcher on those tapes. However, 
according
> to HANZAB, the calls of LFs and SFs are very similar, with lots of
> individual variation, and it says they are separable only with practice.
> Can anyone say whether that first Satin call on the BOCA tapes is
> diagnostic?
>



-------------------------------------------------------------------------------- 



> ===============================
> www.birding-aus.org
> birding-aus.blogspot.com
>
> To unsubscribe from this mailing list,
> send the message:
> unsubscribe
> (in the body of the message, with no Subject line)
> to: birding-aus-request AT vicnet.net.au
> =============================== 




===============================
www.birding-aus.org
birding-aus.blogspot.com

To unsubscribe from this mailing list, 
send the message:
unsubscribe 
(in the body of the message, with no Subject line)
to: birding-aus-request AT vicnet.net.au
===============================
Subject: RE: Rare Bird Alerts Data Capture
From: Simon Mustoe <simonmustoe AT hotmail.com>
Date: Thu, 5 Nov 2009 04:42:43 +0000
David,



We're working on it. Wildiaries has been built with exactly that in
mind. The coding behind it offers the chance to integrate all these facilities, 
whilst 

retaining the existing sites, empowering the existing administrators
and improving the reach of each birding network. It takes time and money 
though... 




Regards,



Simon. 




> From: davidstowe AT optusnet.com.au
> To: cookilaria AT yahoo.com
> Subject: Re: [Birding-Aus] Rare Bird Alerts Data Capture
> Date: Thu, 5 Nov 2009 12:47:03 +1100
> CC: richard AT birdingtours.com.au; birding-aus AT vicnet.net.au
> 
> Fantastic points raised here Richard and I'm not sure what we do about  
> it.
> As an avid birder/low level twitcher I actually find it confusing with  
> the number of different outlets - ie do i post to Birding-Aus, eremea,  
> Birds Australia Atlas, Birdpedia ...etc ..or do i too just put it in  
> the too hard basket and just call a couple of mates?! So bringing  
> those perspectives together with one united system would be great -  
> easier to publicise to the masses and less confusing for the others?
> 
> Cheers
> Dave
> 
> On 05/11/2009, at 12:19 PM, Richard Baxter wrote:
> 
> 
> 
> Hello Birders,
>                     Personally I don't have a great problem with the  
> current methods of disseminating data in relation to rarity  
> sightings.  In most cases, the information gets through relatively  
> quickly, whether its phone call, text, birding-aus or eremaea etc.
> 
> I admit receiving sighting details in real-time would be great but my  
> biggest issue is not the receiving of information but the CAPTURE of  
> information.
> 
> We have to have the sighting information before we can send it out to  
> the masses.  The single most frustrating element of twitching is  
> obviously dipping and I've lost count of the number of rarities that  
> have been reported, days and often over a week after they were first  
> seen.
> 
> The question is: How do we make it easy for people to report their  
> sightings?
> 
> The reality is that only a very small percentage of people birding in  
> Australia are on Birding-Aus and even fewer have ever heard of  
> Eremaea.  Most don't know who or what to ring and therefore many  
> sightings go unreported.
> 
> There are many examples.
> 
> 1. Grey-headed Lapwing.  Not reported on B-Aus until days after the  
> initial sighting, Why?
> 
> 2. Last year I dropped into a remote property near Broome and was  
> talking to the owner, an old bloke, who had built a rain forest in his  
> backyard.  He told me he had seen Blue and White Flycatcher and Red- 
> legged Crake in recent years at the pond near his back door!
> I said," Did you let anyone know, they're pretty interesting birds to  
> see?"  He said," I wouldn't know who to tell, mate."
> 
> 3. A couple of years ago I twitched a bird that had been reported on B- 
> Aus and dipped.  Whilst at the location I ran into the bloke that  
> found the bird and ascertained it had arrived 10 days ago and hadn't  
> been seen for the last two days.  I asked him why he didn't tell  
> someone sooner and he said," I didn't know who to tell, I've only ever  
> met one serious birdwatcher and that was some bloke from Melbourne,  
> 20yrs ago."
> 
> There are thousands of people out there birding everyday, the same  
> thousands that are buying the thousands of field guides each year from  
> bookshops.
> 
> Q.  A grey nomad sitting in front of his caravan looking over the lake  
> in Kununurra sees a Grey Heron land on the bank 30m away. He checks  
> his field guide and reads that Grey Heron is very rare in Australia.   
> He's not an avid birder, hasn't got the internet in his van and knows  
> no keen birders to ring.  How does he tell anyone about the sighting??
> 
> How do we capture these sightings to put on rare bird alerts?
> 
> 
> Cheers
> Richard Baxter
> 
> 
> 
> 
> 
> 
> 
> 
> 
> 
> 
> 
> 
> 
> 
> 
>        
> 
__________________________________________________________________________________ 

> Win 1 of 4 Sony home entertainment packs thanks to Yahoo!7.
> Enter now: http://au.docs.yahoo.com/homepageset/
> www.birding-aus.org
> birding-aus.blogspot.com
> 
> To unsubscribe from this mailing list,
> send the message:
> unsubscribe
> (in the body of the message, with no Subject line)
> to: birding-aus-request AT vicnet.net.au
> 
> 
> ===============================
> www.birding-aus.org
> birding-aus.blogspot.com
> 
> To unsubscribe from this mailing list, 
> send the message:
> unsubscribe 
> (in the body of the message, with no Subject line)
> to: birding-aus-request AT vicnet.net.au
> ===============================
 		 	   		  
_________________________________________________________________
New Windows 7: Simplify what you do everyday. Find the right PC for you.

http://www.microsoft.com/uk/windows/buy/==============================www.birding-aus.org 

birding-aus.blogspot.com

To unsubscribe from this mailing list,
send the message:
unsubscribe
(in the body of the message, with no Subject line)
to: birding-aus-request AT vicnet.net.au
==============================
Subject: Re: BARC website
From: Alistair McKeough <alistair.mckeough AT gmail.com>
Date: Thu, 5 Nov 2009 15:22:22 +1100
Thank you everyone for your responses. It appear that my link was correct
and that Telstra was just having a wobbly when I was trying to look
yesterday, so the site was down.

Alistair

2009/11/4 Alistair McKeough 

> Could somebody point me in the direction of BARC's website. I think it used
> to be kindly hosted by Tony Palliser on his bigpond, but the link I have
> seems to be dead.
>
> Has it moved?
>
> Alistair
>
===============================
www.birding-aus.org
birding-aus.blogspot.com

To unsubscribe from this mailing list, 
send the message:
unsubscribe 
(in the body of the message, with no Subject line)
to: birding-aus-request AT vicnet.net.au
===============================
Subject: Re: [Birding-Aus] Australian Painted Snipe in Dubbo
From: "Colin R" <jangles AT fastmail.fm>
Date: Wed, 04 Nov 2009 13:12:19 +1000
Hi all

Just like to make an observation relating to accessing private property
- in my experience this is a real issue in Australia. Owners seem to
have some sort of possession fixation relating to their vast, mostly
uninhabitated land! In the UK and Ireland there is a much more flexible,
friendly attitude towards birders and others, such as walkers, accessing
property. In most cases so long as gates are left as found - usually
closed  - and stock left unmolested, there is no major drama. Please do
not equate my comments to some one walking through MY front yard - its
not the same, sorry, can't accept that argument. The fact that some
people do access property for the purposes of shooting illegally - that
I can accept - but its usually fairly obvious you're not carrying a
rifle, isn't it?

Anyway - must away - thanks for your time!

Cheers

Colin

Chris's observations regarding the deaths of rare vagrants may, repeat
may, have some truth - however, in general birders are not seen as such
a threat as they often appear here and yes, I too have heard of the
issues on the Scilly Isles, but we are talking extremes here, not the
norm. 

On Wed, 04 Nov 2009 03:56 +0930, "Denise Goodfellow"
 wrote:
> I'd be interested in seeing Laurie's research.  I've some US papers that
> mention this as well.
> 
> I've twice, in 26 years, been guiding birders who have either entered
> private property or gone into sensitive habitat.  The last one, a woman
> just
> a few months ago, entered a preschool grounds after a bird.  A few have
> been
> disgruntled when I refused to play tapes to call up birds in particular
> areas.  
> 
> The biggest issue in the Top End that I'm aware of is birders entering
> the
> sewage ponds without a permit, resulting in management becoming very
> upset
> to the point of threatening to arrest them.  Consequently, access to the
> ponds has been further tightened.
> 
> However, in my experience up here, combat or gonzo birders (as they're
> called in the US) tend to put themselves at risk more than the birds, for
> instance insisting on going out when it's very hot and humid. Two, whom I
> refused to accompany one stinking hot afternoon, later collapsed with
> heat
> exhaustion.  
> 
> The desire to systematise eg by stamp collecting or twitching, seems to
> be a
> feature of the male brain according to research I've read.
> Denise
> 
> Denise Lawungkurr Goodfellow
> PO Box 3460 NT 0832, AUSTRALIA
> Ph. 61 08 89 328306
> Mobile: 04 386 50 835
> 
> Birdwatching and Indigenous tourism consultant
> PhD Candidate
> 
> http://www.denisegoodfellow.com.au
> http://www.earthfoot.org
> http://groups.yahoo.com/group/baby-dreaming
> http://www.ausbird.com
> http://birderstravel.com
> http://www.theloveofood.com (Rowan Goodfellow Thompson)
> 
> 
> 
> on 3/11/09 9:40 PM, Chris Sanderson at chris.sanderson AT gmail.com wrote:
> 
> > Hi Tim,
> > 
> > I believe in the UK a small number of rare birds have died from constant
> > harassment leading to an inability to feed to recover from a long trip.
> > This is possibly what Peter is referring to?  Also I hear from various
> > sources of cases where twitchers (usually identity unknown) have been
> > observed by landholders to tresspass to look for birds.  This still appears
> > to be a sadly common occurrence, though as you say, its not fair to tar all
> > twitchers with that brush as I know many who wouldn't enter a property
> > without permission.  However those that do give all birders, not just
> > twitchers, a bad name with the general public.
> > 
> > I will say this though, a recent study by our own Dr Laurie Knight showed
> > that the more fanatical a twitcher is, the less they care about
> > conservation.  That's hard data from a fairly broad survey there (I hope
> > I've paraphrased your work correctly there Laurie, feel free to jump in if
> > I'm misquoting).
> > 
> > As for earlier questions about collectors, I'd love to hear from someone in
> > the customs department, but I know for a fact they are still finding living
> > animals being smuggled, and I have little doubt that the same would go for
> > dead animals - there are a lot of people for whom collecting 
skins/specimens 

> > is akin to stamp collecting (or pokemon for the younger people out there
> > reading this...gotta catch em all).  Look no further than our own official
> > bodies - out there looking to collect one or several of the newly found
> > Spotted Quail-Thrush in Far North QLD before they even know if its a new
> > species or even how many there are in the population...
> > 
> > Back to the point at hand.  I thought the objection was over GPS
> > co-ordinates being given in an open online forum. A general location in the 

> > email with an offer of directions offline would be fine I would think, as
> > suggested by an earlier poster.  At least that means someone wanting to
> > break the law has to leave evidence in the form of an email if they want 
the 

> > details.
> > 
> > Regards,
> > Chris
> > 
> > On Tue, Nov 3, 2009 at 6:06 PM, Tim Jones  wrote:
> > 
> >> 
> >> Peter,
> >> 
> >> 
> >> 
> >> What do the 'fanatical Twitchers' do? I reckon this is mostly just
> >> sensationalised hearsay. I see so much prattle about the terrible harm 
they 

> >> do, but I have yet to see a properly substantiated report of something 
which 

> >> has had any serious effect on wildlife and I've been on many, many
> >> 'fanatical twitches' in my time.
> >> 
> >> 
> >> 
> >> There are a few people who go a bit too far in their pursuit, but most
> >> 'fanatical twitchers' are also fanatical conservationists and also want
> >> future generations to share their joy of seeing wonderful places and
> >> wonderful wildlife.
> >> 
> >> 
> >> 
> >> I just wish people would get things in proportion. This kind of statement
> >> tars us all with the same brush and just gets us all a bad name.
> >> 
> >> 
> >> 
> >> NB I'm not arguing about the need to be judicious with information.
> >> 
> >> 
> >> 
> >> Cheers
> >> 
> >> 
> >> 
> >> Tim
> >> 
> >> 
> >> 
> >> 
> >>> From: kbrandwood AT bigpond.com
> >>> To: pshute AT nuw.org.au; carlsclifford AT gmail.com
> >>> Subject: Re: [SPAM] [Birding-Aus] Australian Painted Snipe in Dubbo
> >>> Date: Tue, 3 Nov 2009 11:28:29 +1100
> >>> CC: d.eldridge AT unsw.edu.au;
> >>> 
> >>> Hi Peter, my main concern was the Painted Snipe, and yes I do believe
> >> that
> >>> there are people who would take a Painted Snipe for their collection. Its
> >> no
> >>> different than collecting feathers a subject that as been discussed
> >> recently
> >>> on this forum. Collecting feathers appears to be a harmless pastime on
> >> the
> >>> surface but you can imagine someone who as all the feathers of all the
> >>> parrot species except for the Night Parrot. I could easily see such a
> >> person
> >>> trying to find out where to find one and going out and shooting it to get
> >>> the feather.You only have to see what some of the fanatical Twitchers get
> >> up
> >>> to at times to understand the need to be alert to whom you give
> >> information
> >>> to. Thankfully it is only a small minority that are involved in such
> >>> behaviour.
> >>> ----- Original Message -----
> >>> From: "Peter Shute" 
> >>> To: ; 
> >>> Cc: ; 
> >>> Sent: Monday, November 02, 2009 5:49 PM
> >>> Subject: Re: [SPAM] [Birding-Aus] Australian Painted Snipe in Dubbo
> >>> 
> >>> 
> >>>> I know this is true for birds on the nest, (especially parrots?) but
> >> would
> >>>> someone really collect a Painted Snipe or a Brolga?
> >>>> 
> >>>> Peter Shute
> >>>> 
> >>>> 
> >>>> --------------------------
> >>>> Sent using BlackBerry
> >>>> 
> >>>> ----- Original Message -----
> >>>> From: birding-aus-bounces AT vicnet.net.au
> >>>> 
> >>>> To: Keith Brandwood 
> >>>> Cc: David Eldridge ; birding-aus AT vicnet.net.au
> >>>> 
> >>>> Sent: Mon Nov 02 17:45:54 2009
> >>>> Subject: Re: [SPAM] [Birding-Aus] Australian Painted Snipe in Dubbo
> >>>> 
> >>>> Keith,
> >>>> 
> >>>> I heartily agree.
> >>>> 
> >>>> Carl Clifford
> >>>> 
> >>>> 
> >>>> On 02/11/2009, at 4:38 PM, Keith Brandwood wrote:
> >>>> 
> >>>> Why are we still giving out coordinates for endangered species such as
> >>>> the Painted Snipe or any other endangered species on this forum.
> >>>> Please lets stop this practice from today.All that is required is to
> >>>> ask them to contact you if they want to see the species, then after
> >>>> vetting them you can decide on whether you want to tell them.
> >>>> Collecting rare wildlife can assure you is still alive and kicking.
> >>>> ----- Original Message ----- From: "Frank Hemmings"
> >>>>  >>>>> 
> >>>> To: 
> >>>> Cc: "David Eldridge" 
> >>>> Sent: Monday, November 02, 2009 8:41 AM
> >>>> Subject: [SPAM] [Birding-Aus] Australian Painted Snipe in Dubbo
> >>>> 
> >>>> 
> >>>> Hi All,
> >>>> 
> >>>> As part of our twitchathon effort, the Bumbling Bee-eaters (David
> >>>> Eldridge, David Hair and myself) saw an Australian Painted Snipe in
> >>>> Dubbo on Saturday afternoon; this was in the first 10 birds seen on
> >>>> the trip and congratulations to Dave Eldridge for spotting it. The
> >>>> bird, a female, was sitting low in a small pond off Fitzroy St, N of
> >>>> the itnersection with River St & off the E side of the road. There
> >>>> were 2 small ponds, and it was sitting on the edge of the smaller,
> >>>> further pond; it turns out that this is actually closer to the end of
> >>>> Dowton Drive off River St. Grid coordinates from Google Earth 32deg
> >>>> 13min 54.1sec S, 148deg 37min, 3.6sec E. This was a lifer for me
> >>>> which I hadn't expected on this trip, and to see this bird without
> >>>> expecting it at a site was a great suprise.
> >>>> 
> >>>> Also of note were 2 Brolgas on a tank seen from Coolbaggie Forest Rd,
> >>>> 4km from Eumungerie at 31deg 57min 43 sec S, 148deg 39min 32sec E.
> >>>> 
> >>>> I'm not sure if either of these are still there but I'm sure some may
> >>>> be interested in finding them. All up we recorded 185 species between
> >>>> Dubbo and Newcastle - not bad for a first time run. Cheers,
> >>>> 
> >>>> Frank
> >>>> 
> >>>> Frank Hemmings
> >>>> Curator
> >>>> John T. Waterhouse Herbarium
> >>>> School of Biological, Earth and Environmental Sciences
> >>>> University of New South Wales
> >>>> UNSW SYDNEY 2052
> >>>> AUSTRALIA
> >>>> 
> >>>> Tel +61 2 9385 3274
> >>>> Fax +61 2 9385 1558
> >>>> 
> >>>> CRICOS Provider Code:00098G
> >>>> ==========www.birding-aus.org
> >>>> birding-aus.blogspot.com
> >>>> 
> >>>> To unsubscribe from this mailing list,
> >>>> send the message:
> >>>> unsubscribe
> >>>> (in the body of the message, with no Subject line)
> >>>> to: birding-aus-request AT vicnet.net.au
> >>>> ==========
> >>>> ===============================
> >>>> www.birding-aus.org
> >>>> birding-aus.blogspot.com
> >>>> 
> >>>> To unsubscribe from this mailing list, send the message:
> >>>> unsubscribe (in the body of the message, with no Subject line)
> >>>> to: birding-aus-request AT vicnet.net.au
> >>>> ===============================
> >>>> 
> >>>> ===============================
> >>>> www.birding-aus.org
> >>>> birding-aus.blogspot.com
> >>>> 
> >>>> To unsubscribe from this mailing list,
> >>>> send the message:
> >>>> unsubscribe
> >>>> (in the body of the message, with no Subject line)
> >>>> to: birding-aus-request AT vicnet.net.au
> >>>> ===============================
> >>>> 
> >>> 
> >>> ===============================
> >>> www.birding-aus.org
> >>> birding-aus.blogspot.com
> >>> 
> >>> To unsubscribe from this mailing list,
> >>> send the message:
> >>> unsubscribe
> >>> (in the body of the message, with no Subject line)
> >>> to: birding-aus-request AT vicnet.net.au
> >>> ===============================
> >> 
> >> _________________________________________________________________
> >> View photos of singles in your area Click Here
> >> http://clk.atdmt.com/NMN/go/150855801/direct/01/www.birding-aus.org
> >> birding-aus.blogspot.com
> >> 
> >> To unsubscribe from this mailing list,
> >> send the message:
> >> unsubscribe
> >> (in the body of the message, with no Subject line)
> >> to: birding-aus-request AT vicnet.net.au
> >> 
> > ===============================
> > www.birding-aus.org
> > birding-aus.blogspot.com
> > 
> > To unsubscribe from this mailing list,
> > send the message:
> > unsubscribe 
> > (in the body of the message, with no Subject line)
> > to: birding-aus-request AT vicnet.net.au
> > ===============================
> 
> 
> ===============================
> www.birding-aus.org
> birding-aus.blogspot.com
> 
> To unsubscribe from this mailing list, 
> send the message:
> unsubscribe 
> (in the body of the message, with no Subject line)
> to: birding-aus-request AT vicnet.net.au
> ===============================
-- 
  Colin Reid
  jangles AT fastmail.fm
So many birds, so little time...... 


-- 
http://www.fastmail.fm - A fast, anti-spam email service.

===============================
www.birding-aus.org
birding-aus.blogspot.com

To unsubscribe from this mailing list, 
send the message:
unsubscribe 
(in the body of the message, with no Subject line)
to: birding-aus-request AT vicnet.net.au
===============================
Subject: BARC website
From: Alistair McKeough <alistair.mckeough AT gmail.com>
Date: Wed, 4 Nov 2009 13:52:33 +1100
Could somebody point me in the direction of BARC's website. I think it used
to be kindly hosted by Tony Palliser on his bigpond, but the link I have
seems to be dead.

Has it moved?

Alistair
===============================
www.birding-aus.org
birding-aus.blogspot.com

To unsubscribe from this mailing list, 
send the message:
unsubscribe 
(in the body of the message, with no Subject line)
to: birding-aus-request AT vicnet.net.au
===============================
Subject: Re: Red-necked Crake etc.
From: "Alan Gillanders" <alan AT alanswildlifetours.com.au>
Date: Thu, 5 Nov 2009 12:11:45 +1000
G'day All,
I concur about the Black-faced Monarchs. We had an early wave here on the 
Southern Tablelands and then nothing. Now a few. One calling in the yard as 
I type.

Had Superb Fruit-doves on an egg but something got the egg without damaging 
the nest. A Victoria's Riflebird has built its snake-skin lined nest above 
the walkway to the Curtain Fig. You'll have to see the bird to find the 
nest.

Regards,
Alan Gillanders

Alan's Wildlife Tours
2 Mather Road
Yungaburra 4884
www.alanswildlifetours.com.au
Phone 07 4095 3784
Int. + 61 7 4095 3784
Mobile 0408 953 786

Alan's blog http://alanswildlife.blogspot.com/

===============================
www.birding-aus.org
birding-aus.blogspot.com

To unsubscribe from this mailing list, 
send the message:
unsubscribe 
(in the body of the message, with no Subject line)
to: birding-aus-request AT vicnet.net.au
===============================
Subject: Re: Rare Bird Alert Website
From: David Richardson <albatrossvaldez AT gmail.com>
Date: Thu, 5 Nov 2009 13:15:33 +1100
That wasnt you sending one up recently from the pond,was it Peter?

On Thu, Nov 5, 2009 at 11:28 AM, Peter Shute  wrote:

> I hadn't thought of that.  There may be others like Tony who will require a
> smoke signal option.
>
> Peter Shute
>
> Tony Russell wrote on Thursday, 5 November 2009 11:04 AM:
>
> > What's Twitter and Facebook and Web 2.0 apps ??  I still don't use a
> > mobile phone - too much to have to carry around (and expensive? ).
> > Just watch birding-aus for all the info required.
>  www.birding-aus.org
> birding-aus.blogspot.com
>
> To unsubscribe from this mailing list,
> send the message:
> unsubscribe
> (in the body of the message, with no Subject line)
> to: birding-aus-request AT vicnet.net.au
>
===============================
www.birding-aus.org
birding-aus.blogspot.com

To unsubscribe from this mailing list, 
send the message:
unsubscribe 
(in the body of the message, with no Subject line)
to: birding-aus-request AT vicnet.net.au
===============================
Subject: Re: Rare Bird Alerts Data Capture
From: David Stowe <davidstowe AT optusnet.com.au>
Date: Thu, 5 Nov 2009 12:47:03 +1100
Fantastic points raised here Richard and I'm not sure what we do about  
it.
As an avid birder/low level twitcher I actually find it confusing with  
the number of different outlets - ie do i post to Birding-Aus, eremea,  
Birds Australia Atlas, Birdpedia ...etc ..or do i too just put it in  
the too hard basket and just call a couple of mates?! So bringing  
those perspectives together with one united system would be great -  
easier to publicise to the masses and less confusing for the others?

Cheers
Dave

On 05/11/2009, at 12:19 PM, Richard Baxter wrote:



Hello Birders,
                    Personally I don't have a great problem with the  
current methods of disseminating data in relation to rarity  
sightings.  In most cases, the information gets through relatively  
quickly, whether its phone call, text, birding-aus or eremaea etc.

I admit receiving sighting details in real-time would be great but my  
biggest issue is not the receiving of information but the CAPTURE of  
information.

We have to have the sighting information before we can send it out to  
the masses.  The single most frustrating element of twitching is  
obviously dipping and I've lost count of the number of rarities that  
have been reported, days and often over a week after they were first  
seen.

The question is: How do we make it easy for people to report their  
sightings?

The reality is that only a very small percentage of people birding in  
Australia are on Birding-Aus and even fewer have ever heard of  
Eremaea.  Most don't know who or what to ring and therefore many  
sightings go unreported.

There are many examples.

1. Grey-headed Lapwing.  Not reported on B-Aus until days after the  
initial sighting, Why?

2. Last year I dropped into a remote property near Broome and was  
talking to the owner, an old bloke, who had built a rain forest in his  
backyard.  He told me he had seen Blue and White Flycatcher and Red- 
legged Crake in recent years at the pond near his back door!
I said," Did you let anyone know, they're pretty interesting birds to  
see?"  He said," I wouldn't know who to tell, mate."

3. A couple of years ago I twitched a bird that had been reported on B- 
Aus and dipped.  Whilst at the location I ran into the bloke that  
found the bird and ascertained it had arrived 10 days ago and hadn't  
been seen for the last two days.  I asked him why he didn't tell  
someone sooner and he said," I didn't know who to tell, I've only ever  
met one serious birdwatcher and that was some bloke from Melbourne,  
20yrs ago."

There are thousands of people out there birding everyday, the same  
thousands that are buying the thousands of field guides each year from  
bookshops.

Q.  A grey nomad sitting in front of his caravan looking over the lake  
in Kununurra sees a Grey Heron land on the bank 30m away. He checks  
his field guide and reads that Grey Heron is very rare in Australia.   
He's not an avid birder, hasn't got the internet in his van and knows  
no keen birders to ring.  How does he tell anyone about the sighting??

How do we capture these sightings to put on rare bird alerts?


Cheers
Richard Baxter
















       

__________________________________________________________________________________ 

Win 1 of 4 Sony home entertainment packs thanks to Yahoo!7.
Enter now: http://au.docs.yahoo.com/homepageset/
www.birding-aus.org
birding-aus.blogspot.com

To unsubscribe from this mailing list,
send the message:
unsubscribe
(in the body of the message, with no Subject line)
to: birding-aus-request AT vicnet.net.au


===============================
www.birding-aus.org
birding-aus.blogspot.com

To unsubscribe from this mailing list, 
send the message:
unsubscribe 
(in the body of the message, with no Subject line)
to: birding-aus-request AT vicnet.net.au
===============================
Subject: Rare Bird Alerts Data Capture
From: Richard Baxter <cookilaria AT yahoo.com>
Date: Wed, 4 Nov 2009 17:19:51 -0800 (PST)

Hello Birders,
                   Personally I don't have a great problem with the current 
methods of disseminating data in relation to rarity sightings.  In most cases, 
the information gets through relatively quickly, whether its phone call, text, 
birding-aus or eremaea etc.  

 
I admit receiving sighting details in real-time would be great but my biggest 
issue is not the receiving of information but the CAPTURE of information. 

 
We have to have the sighting information before we can send it out to the 
masses.  The single most frustrating element of twitching is obviously dipping 
and I've lost count of the number of rarities that have been reported, days and 
often over a week after they were first seen.  

 
The question is: How do we make it easy for people to report their sightings?
 
The reality is that only a very small percentage of people birding in Australia 
are on Birding-Aus and even fewer have ever heard of Eremaea.  Most don't know 
who or what to ring and therefore many sightings go unreported.  

 
There are many examples.
 
1. Grey-headed Lapwing.  Not reported on B-Aus until days after the initial 
sighting, Why? 

 
2. Last year I dropped into a remote property near Broome and was talking to 
the owner, an old bloke, who had built a rain forest in his backyard.  He told 
me he had seen Blue and White Flycatcher and Red-legged Crake in recent years 
at the pond near his back door! 

I said," Did you let anyone know, they're pretty interesting birds to see?"  He 
said," I wouldn't know who to tell, mate." 

 
3. A couple of years ago I twitched a bird that had been reported on B-Aus and 
dipped.  Whilst at the location I ran into the bloke that found the bird and 
ascertained it had arrived 10 days ago and hadn't been seen for the last two 
days.  I asked him why he didn't tell someone sooner and he said," I didn't 
know who to tell, I've only ever met one serious birdwatcher and that was some 
bloke from Melbourne, 20yrs ago." 

 
There are thousands of people out there birding everyday, the same thousands 
that are buying the thousands of field guides each year from bookshops.  

 
Q.  A grey nomad sitting in front of his caravan looking over the lake in 
Kununurra sees a Grey Heron land on the bank 30m away. He checks his field 
guide and reads that Grey Heron is very rare in Australia.  He's not an avid 
birder, hasn't got the internet in his van and knows no keen birders to ring.  
How does he tell anyone about the sighting?? 

 
How do we capture these sightings to put on rare bird alerts?
 
 
Cheers
Richard Baxter
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 


 
__________________________________________________________________________________ 

Win 1 of 4 Sony home entertainment packs thanks to Yahoo!7.
Enter now: http://au.docs.yahoo.com/homepageset/
==============================www.birding-aus.org
birding-aus.blogspot.com

To unsubscribe from this mailing list,
send the message:
unsubscribe
(in the body of the message, with no Subject line)
to: birding-aus-request AT vicnet.net.au
==============================
Subject: RE: Rare Bird Alert Website
From: Peter Shute <pshute AT nuw.org.au>
Date: Thu, 5 Nov 2009 11:28:07 +1100
I hadn't thought of that. There may be others like Tony who will require a 
smoke signal option. 


Peter Shute

Tony Russell wrote on Thursday, 5 November 2009 11:04 AM:

> What's Twitter and Facebook and Web 2.0 apps ??  I still don't use a
> mobile phone - too much to have to carry around (and expensive? ).
> Just watch birding-aus for all the info required.  
==============================www.birding-aus.org
birding-aus.blogspot.com

To unsubscribe from this mailing list,
send the message:
unsubscribe
(in the body of the message, with no Subject line)
to: birding-aus-request AT vicnet.net.au
==============================
Subject: RE: Rare Bird Alert Operator
From: "Tony Russell" <pratincole AT esc.net.au>
Date: Thu, 5 Nov 2009 10:35:30 +1030
Nah ! Just watch b-a.

T.

-----Original Message-----
From: birding-aus-bounces AT vicnet.net.au
[mailto:birding-aus-bounces AT vicnet.net.au] On Behalf Of Carl Clifford
Sent: Thursday, November 05, 2009 9:57 AM
To: Birding-Aus Aus
Subject: [Birding-Aus] Rare Bird Alert Operator


There seem to be quite a few out there who are in favour of a rare  
bird alert system. Unfortunately no one has put up their hand to  
operate the system.
I presume that the organisation and operation is to be left up to the  
marvellous multi-skilled they.

Cheers,

Carl Clifford
===============================
www.birding-aus.org
birding-aus.blogspot.com

To unsubscribe from this mailing list, 
send the message:
unsubscribe 
(in the body of the message, with no Subject line)
to: birding-aus-request AT vicnet.net.au ===============================

===============================
www.birding-aus.org
birding-aus.blogspot.com

To unsubscribe from this mailing list, 
send the message:
unsubscribe 
(in the body of the message, with no Subject line)
to: birding-aus-request AT vicnet.net.au
===============================
Subject: RE: Rare Bird Alert Website
From: "Tony Russell" <pratincole AT esc.net.au>
Date: Thu, 5 Nov 2009 10:34:20 +1030
What's Twitter and Facebook and Web 2.0 apps ??  I still don't use a
mobile phone - too much to have to carry around (and expensive? ). Just
watch birding-aus for all the info required.

Tony.
. 

-----Original Message-----
From: birding-aus-bounces AT vicnet.net.au
[mailto:birding-aus-bounces AT vicnet.net.au] On Behalf Of John Leonard
Sent: Thursday, November 05, 2009 8:47 AM
To: Birding-aus
Subject: Re: [Birding-Aus] Rare Bird Alert Website


I think keep it simple, remember that a lot of old fogeys like myself
haven't caught up with Web 2.0 apps like Twitter and Facebook.

A susbscription web-page with a feed. New reports are posted at the top
with all the details and contacts.

What could be simpler?

John Leonard

2009/11/4 Rosemary Royle :
> Thanks Luke for such an excellent and thoughtful post - it certainly 
> helped me understand how tools like Twitter could be sensibly 
> exploited.
>
> Rosemary.
>  ----- Original Message -----
>  From: Luke Shelley
>  To: Birding Aus
>  Sent: Wednesday, November 04, 2009 10:52 AM
>  Subject: [Birding-Aus] Rare Bird Alert Website
>
>
>  Great to see some good conversations recently on the subject of 
> birding
>  internet sites, and new online tools for birding. Interesting to note
is
>  that Twitter did not seem to feature in the recent conversation
regarding
>  the *Rare Bird Alert Website*, yet it is probably the best suited
(and by
>  that I mean the technology, and not the brand name itself) to meet
the
>  seemingly increasing demands of 'real-time' mass communication of
bird
>  sightings. The following is an email to Birding-Aus that I intended
to post
>  last week in response to the *Birdlines on Twitter* discussion, but
it is
>  related to the current discussion on *Rare Bird Alert Websites*:
>
>  Social Networking (the umbrella that covers Twitter, Facebook, 
> MySpace etc)
>  might appear to be a relatively new thing, but in fact they are just
tools
>  for online networking. This website, and a number of other locally
produced
>  birding websites, are also prime examples of Social Networking.
Birders have
>  been doing it for years.
>
>  It is inevitable that birders will eventually make the transition to 
> using
>  these tools. Why? Because they are tailored perfectly (well, almost
>  perfectly) to what we already do, but they will enhance and enrich
our
>  experience. One other reason that this form of communication is
inevitable
>  is that young people of today are brought up with this medium for
>  communication, and they use it everyday. By that, I mean that they
have a
>  standard way that they expect to receive information.
>
>  It is interesting to note some of the comments regarding the 
> introduction of
>  Birdlines to Twitter, "clutter" being one of them. I agree that it
seems
>  like clutter with all of the new online tools and mobile apps that
are
>  pushed upon us. I also agree that they are somewhat prohibitive given
the
>  cost, but that will change (or at least come down) over time.
However, from
>  the perspective of the next and future generation of birders,
"clutter"
>  would be a word they would use to describe this very website, and a
number
>  of others that are commonly used by birders in Australia. That is
purely
>  because these websites are not presented in a way that a reader can
quickly
>  and easily gather the information they want. The new world wants the
answer,
>  and they want it right away, with minimum effort.
>
>  Lets look at a couple of examples of where these new tools can 
> enhance what
>  we currently do in the birding world:
>  1. The use of birdlines
>  Scenario 1 (Current): A birder goes out to the WTP for day. During
the day
>  the birder passes a number of other birders, waving as they go by, as
they
>  do not really know these people. The following day the birder is
looking at
>  Birdline, and notices that someone has posted a sighting of a Ruff.
The
>  birder is disappointed as they did not see the Ruff.
>  Scenario 2 (Future): A birder goes out to the WTP for a day. The
birder is a
>  subscriber to the new Birdline Twitter feed. Whilst at the plant the
birder
>  receives a live Twitter update that there is a Ruff at the Borrow
Pits. The
>  birder quickly drives down there, and meets with the other birder who
just
>  posted the sighting only minutes earlier. The birder now has a new
tick, and
>  a new friend.
>
>  2. Twitching amongst specific groups
>  Scenario 1 (Current): A Blue-and-White Flycatcher turns up in Broome.

> One
>  particular high profile twitcher is telephoned by someone in Broome,
and he
>  has packed his bags and is on his way. This twitcher has about a
dozen
>  friends who would also be interested in seeing this bird, so he calls
them
>  on his mobile, one by one. Who does he call first?
>  Scenario 2 (Future): A Blue-and-White Flycatcher turns up in Broome.
One
>  particular high profile twitcher is telephoned by someone in Broome,
and he
>  has packed his bags and is on his way. This twitcher has about a
dozen
>  friends who would also be interested in seeing this bird, and he
wants to
>  let them all know at once, but doesn't particularly want to post the
site on
>  the website so everyone can see. Fortunately the twitcher and his
friends
>  have established a closed network so that they can only see each
others
>  posts, and no-one else can see the posts. The twitcher posts to his
network,
>  and all of his fellow twitchers receive the sighting instantly, all
at the
>  same time. They are all on their way, and will probably all arrive at
the
>  same time.
>
>  I think the new social networking tools are great, but in their 
> current form
>  they are not ideal. As birders, we need to shape them into tools that
are
>  useful for what we love doing most: birding!
>
>  *End of original email*
>  *
>  *
>  With regards to the latest discussion on Rare Bird Alert Websites, I 
> would
>  like to bring up a couple of extra points, along the same lines as
above.
>
>  Firstly, there appears to be an assumption that the users of such 
> websites
>  are only after rare or unusual sightings - I believe that this is not
>  entirely true. Speaking for myself, being a novice birder I use the
websites
>  not only to find rare birds, but also to pick up reasonably common or
>  seasonal birds that I do not yet have on my list. By creating a
website that
>  only posts sightings of rare birds (subjectively), we are restricting
the
>  use of the site, and limiting the possibilities of what the site can
become.
>  A far better way would be to base postings on user defined choices,
or
>  automated rules through coding. Sooner or later birding websites are
going
>  to become so inundated that manual moderation of the site will become
almost
>  impossible. It would be very easy to code in specific rules that
>  automatically moderate a website so that particular species or
locations
>  would or would not be shown. Along with modern day geographic
information
>  systems (GIS), this could easily become spatially based rules as
well. Any
>  sightings that 'break the rules' so to speak could then be flagged
for
>  manual moderation.
>
>  Secondly, the real power of any of these websites is in the 
> contributors. I
>  have seen some nice looking birding websites out there, but they are
not
>  currently successful because they do not have a wealth of
contribution that
>  some of the other sites have. I believe this comes down to
'usability',
>  which relates to my comment of 'clutter' in my initial email above.
There is
>  currently also the issue of all of these different tools and websites
on
>  offer that are not in one central location.
>
>  For those of you that are keen, do some searching on "Web 2.0" on the
>  internet (Wikipedia is a good start). Next time you visit your 
> favourite
>  birding website, ask yourself these questions:
>  What is it I want to do?
>  What do I have to do to do it? (i.e. what are the steps involved, how
many
>  clicks does it take to get there, how easy is it to do)
>  How is the information displayed? Can you think of better ways? Or is
this
>  display perfect as it is?
>  How long does it take to display in this way? Are maps too slow?
>  What ways would you like to display or filter the information in your
own
>  way?
>
>  The more of us that write down these ideas, the more we can formulate

> them
>  into a 'business case' and present them to the current website
owners, or
>  indeed to a budding new website designer. I have plenty of ideas I
have
>  already put on paper, and I would be more than willing to discuss
them with
>  anyone here. They range from ways to mass communicate (e.g. twitter
etc), to
>  social networks for creating and sharing bird lists, events etc (e.g.
>  Facebook etc), all the way to submitting survey and Atlas records.
The
>  possibilities are endless.
>
>  I see our birding websites, including this one, as more than just a 
> place to
>  post and discuss rare bird sightings. I see them as a gateway to the
great
>  pastime of birding, for novices and veterans alike, and the more we
come to
>  realise that, the many more people will come to enjoy birding both
now and
>  into the future.
>
>  Regards,
>
>  Luke
>  ===============================
>  www.birding-aus.org
>  birding-aus.blogspot.com
>
>  To unsubscribe from this mailing list,
>  send the message:
>  unsubscribe
>  (in the body of the message, with no Subject line)
>  to: birding-aus-request AT vicnet.net.au
>  ===============================
>
>
> ----------------------------------------------------------------------
> --------
>
>
>
>  No virus found in this incoming message.
>  Checked by AVG - www.avg.com
>  Version: 8.5.424 / Virus Database: 270.14.48/2479 - Release Date: 
> 11/03/09 19:38:00 www.birding-aus.org birding-aus.blogspot.com
>
> To unsubscribe from this mailing list,
> send the message:
> unsubscribe
> (in the body of the message, with no Subject line)
> to: birding-aus-request AT vicnet.net.au
>



-- 
John Leonard
Canberra
Australia
www.jleonard.net

"I rejoice that there are owls." Thoreau ==========www.birding-aus.org
birding-aus.blogspot.com

To unsubscribe from this mailing list, 
send the message:
unsubscribe 
(in the body of the message, with no Subject line)
to: birding-aus-request AT vicnet.net.au
===========

==============================www.birding-aus.org
birding-aus.blogspot.com

To unsubscribe from this mailing list,
send the message:
unsubscribe
(in the body of the message, with no Subject line)
to: birding-aus-request AT vicnet.net.au
==============================
Subject: RE: [Birding-Aus] Australian Painted Snipe in Dubbo
From: "Tony Russell" <pratincole AT esc.net.au>
Date: Thu, 5 Nov 2009 10:28:56 +1030
Hi all, I found Mike's note interesting , particularly in para 2 in
which he talks of UK twitchers travelling 200 miles for a bird.
 200 Miles !! 
 Well well, it's a bit different here in Oz where we frequently travel
many thousands of km for a tick. I hate to think how often I've done
Adelaide to Perth, Darwin, Cairns, Werribee,  Cape York, The Kimberleys,
Christmas Is, Ashmore Reef, Norfolk and Lord Howe, Tasmania, trips into
the outback,  etc etc in search of a single bird ( and usually getting
it) and thinking little of it - except when I've dipped out like we did
last weekend chasing the Southern Fulmar at Portland, pest of a thing !!

Tony.

-----Original Message-----
From: birding-aus-bounces AT vicnet.net.au
[mailto:birding-aus-bounces AT vicnet.net.au] On Behalf Of Mike Collard
Sent: Thursday, November 05, 2009 5:09 AM
To: birding aus
Subject: Re: [SPAM] [Birding-Aus] Australian Painted Snipe in Dubbo


Hi all,

As a lurker from the UK ( although I have birded in Australia and
enjoyed 
wonderful help from this email group ) I thought I should add some
thoughts 
about twitching  in the UK.

1) There are some who will go long distances and spend money to get a
new UK 
bird; recent example was a Sandhill Crane on Orkney; not that easy to
get 
to; damage to the environment is the fuel used to get folks there; it
added 
some revenue to the island though!
2) There are many who will go 200 miles for a good bird; invariably 
collections are organised if it fits in with either the reserve the bird
was 
found in or who found it; eg. the local non-birding vicar found a 
White-crowned Sparrow so an amazing £5k was collected; his church was 
blessed with some new glass including an image of the said Sparrow.
3) Twitching does not really cause a problem; I am sure many of the
rares 
that are twitched never get to their destination anyway; now and again
there 
is some trespass and sometimes the bird gets too much attention but that
is 
about it in the UK; honest!

The Isles of Scilly has done ok because of birders over the years;
boatman 
make substantial money on ferrying birders around the small islands to
catch 
up with rares. Lots of hotels and pubs are full of birders at certain
times; 
again revenue generation.

The serious and continuing danger to all our birds ( including common 
species ) are eggers, developers, shooters of game birds and duck,
crooked 
and poor environmental consultants, insipid Councils and Governments
over 
the years who let people with clout rule and sadly a number of
landowners. 
The lack of insects in the countryside is frightening; go for a drive
years 
ago and your car lights would get covered in insects, but not any more.

Best/ Mike Collard


----- Original Message ----- 
From: "Penny Brockman" 
To: "Tim Jones" 
Cc: ; "birding aus" 
Sent: Wednesday, November 04, 2009 12:36 AM
Subject: Re: [SPAM] [Birding-Aus] Australian Painted Snipe in Dubbo


> Fanatical twitchers in Australia are unlikely to be problem - so far.
> However, I hear things are not so rosy in the UK where there are 
> 1,000s/10,000s ?? of fanatical twitchers prepared to fly from one end
of 
> the country to the other at the drop of a new vagrant.  The Scilly
Isles 
> landowners seem to have a grouch and there have been reports of areas 
> closed from twitchers.
>
>>
>> What do the 'fanatical Twitchers' do? I reckon this is mostly just
>> sensationalised hearsay. I see so much prattle about the terrible
harm 
>> they do, but I have yet to see a properly substantiated report of 
>> something which has had any serious effect on wildlife and I've been
on 
>> many, many 'fanatical twitches' in my time.
>>
>> There are a few people who go a bit too far in their pursuit, but 
>> most
>> 'fanatical twitchers' are also fanatical conservationists and also
want 
>> future generations to share their joy of seeing wonderful places and 
>> wonderful wildlife.
>>
>>
>> I just wish people would get things in proportion. This kind of 
>> statement
>> tars us all with the same brush and just gets us all a bad name.
>>
>>
>> NB I'm not arguing about the need to be judicious with information.
>>
>>
>> Cheers
>>
>>
>> Tim
>>
>>
>>
>>> From: kbrandwood AT bigpond.com
>>> To: pshute AT nuw.org.au; carlsclifford AT gmail.com
>>> Subject: Re: [SPAM] [Birding-Aus] Australian Painted Snipe in Dubbo
>>> Date: Tue, 3 Nov 2009 11:28:29 +1100
>>> CC: d.eldridge AT unsw.edu.au;
>>> Hi Peter, my main concern was the Painted Snipe, and yes I do 
>>> believe
>>> that there are people who would take a Painted Snipe for their 
>>> collection. Its no different than collecting feathers a subject that
as 
>>> been discussed recently on this forum. Collecting feathers appears
to be 
>>> a harmless pastime on the surface but you can imagine someone who as
all 
>>> the feathers of all the parrot species except for the Night Parrot.
I 
>>> could easily see such a person trying to find out where to find one
and 
>>> going out and shooting it to get the feather.You only have to see
what 
>>> some of the fanatical Twitchers get up to at times to understand the

>>> need to be alert to whom you give information to. Thankfully it is
only 
>>> a small minority that are involved in such behaviour.
>>> ----- Original Message ----- 
>>> From: "Peter Shute" 
>>> To: ; 
>>> Cc: ; 
>>> Sent: Monday, November 02, 2009 5:49 PM
>>> Subject: Re: [SPAM] [Birding-Aus] Australian Painted Snipe in Dubbo
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>> I know this is true for birds on the nest, (especially parrots?) 
>>>> but
>>>> would someone really collect a Painted Snipe or a Brolga?
>>>>
>>>> Peter Shute
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> --------------------------
>>>> Sent using BlackBerry
>>>>
>>>> ----- Original Message -----
>>>> From: birding-aus-bounces AT vicnet.net.au
>>>> 
>>>> To: Keith Brandwood 
>>>> Cc: David Eldridge ;
birding-aus AT vicnet.net.au 
>>>> 
>>>> Sent: Mon Nov 02 17:45:54 2009
>>>> Subject: Re: [SPAM] [Birding-Aus] Australian Painted Snipe in Dubbo
>>>>
>>>> Keith,
>>>>
>>>> I heartily agree.
>>>>
>>>> Carl Clifford
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> On 02/11/2009, at 4:38 PM, Keith Brandwood wrote:
>>>>
>>>> Why are we still giving out coordinates for endangered species such

>>>> as the Painted Snipe or any other endangered species on this forum.

>>>> Please lets stop this practice from today.All that is required is 
>>>> to ask them to contact you if they want to see the species, then 
>>>> after vetting them you can decide on whether you want to tell them.

>>>> Collecting rare wildlife can assure you is still alive and kicking.
>>>> ----- Original Message ----- From: "Frank Hemmings"
>>>> >>>       To: 
>>>> Cc: "David Eldridge" 
>>>> Sent: Monday, November 02, 2009 8:41 AM
>>>> Subject: [SPAM] [Birding-Aus] Australian Painted Snipe in Dubbo
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> Hi All,
>>>>
>>>> As part of our twitchathon effort, the Bumbling Bee-eaters (David 
>>>> Eldridge, David Hair and myself) saw an Australian Painted Snipe in

>>>> Dubbo on Saturday afternoon; this was in the first 10 birds seen on

>>>> the trip and congratulations to Dave Eldridge for spotting it. The 
>>>> bird, a female, was sitting low in a small pond off Fitzroy St, N 
>>>> of the itnersection with River St & off the E side of the road. 
>>>> There were 2 small ponds, and it was sitting on the edge of the 
>>>> smaller, further pond; it turns out that this is actually closer to

>>>> the end of Dowton Drive off River St. Grid coordinates from Google 
>>>> Earth 32deg 13min 54.1sec S, 148deg 37min, 3.6sec E. This was a 
>>>> lifer for me which I hadn't expected on this trip, and to see this 
>>>> bird without expecting it at a site was a great suprise.
>>>>
>>>> Also of note were 2 Brolgas on a tank seen from Coolbaggie Forest 
>>>> Rd, 4km from Eumungerie at 31deg 57min 43 sec S, 148deg 39min 32sec

>>>> E.
>>>>
>>>> I'm not sure if either of these are still there but I'm sure some 
>>>> may be interested in finding them. All up we recorded 185 species 
>>>> between Dubbo and Newcastle - not bad for a first time run. Cheers,
>>>>
>>>> Frank
>>>>
>>>> Frank Hemmings
>>>> Curator
>>>> John T. Waterhouse Herbarium
>>>> School of Biological, Earth and Environmental Sciences University 
>>>> of New South Wales UNSW SYDNEY 2052
>>>> AUSTRALIA
>>>>
>>>> Tel +61 2 9385 3274
>>>> Fax +61 2 9385 1558
>>>>
>>>> CRICOS Provider Code:00098G
>>>> ==========www.birding-aus.org
>>>> birding-aus.blogspot.com
>>>>
>>>> To unsubscribe from this mailing list,
>>>> send the message:
>>>> unsubscribe
>>>> (in the body of the message, with no Subject line)
>>>> to: birding-aus-request AT vicnet.net.au
>>>> ==========
>>>> ===============================
>>>> www.birding-aus.org
>>>> birding-aus.blogspot.com
>>>>
>>>> To unsubscribe from this mailing list, send the message: 
>>>> unsubscribe (in the body of the message, with no Subject line)
>>>> to: birding-aus-request AT vicnet.net.au 
>>>> ===============================
>>>>
>>>> ===============================
>>>> www.birding-aus.org
>>>> birding-aus.blogspot.com
>>>>
>>>> To unsubscribe from this mailing list,
>>>> send the message:
>>>> unsubscribe
>>>> (in the body of the message, with no Subject line)
>>>> to: birding-aus-request AT vicnet.net.au 
>>>> ===============================
>>>>
>>>>
>>> ===============================
>>> www.birding-aus.org
>>> birding-aus.blogspot.com
>>>
>>> To unsubscribe from this mailing list, send the message: unsubscribe

>>> (in the body of the message, with no Subject line)
>>> to: birding-aus-request AT vicnet.net.au 
>>> ===============================
>>>
>>       
>> _________________________________________________________________
>> View photos of singles in your area Click Here
>>
http://clk.atdmt.com/NMN/go/150855801/direct/01/========================
======www.birding-aus.org
>> birding-aus.blogspot.com
>>
>> To unsubscribe from this mailing list, send the message: unsubscribe 
>> (in the body of the message, with no Subject line)
>> to: birding-aus-request AT vicnet.net.au ============================
>>
>
> ===============================
> www.birding-aus.org
> birding-aus.blogspot.com
>
> To unsubscribe from this mailing list, send the message:
> unsubscribe (in the body of the message, with no Subject line)
> to: birding-aus-request AT vicnet.net.au
> =============================== 

===============================
www.birding-aus.org
birding-aus.blogspot.com

To unsubscribe from this mailing list, 
send the message:
unsubscribe 
(in the body of the message, with no Subject line)
to: birding-aus-request AT vicnet.net.au
===============================

==============================www.birding-aus.org
birding-aus.blogspot.com

To unsubscribe from this mailing list,
send the message:
unsubscribe
(in the body of the message, with no Subject line)
to: birding-aus-request AT vicnet.net.au
==============================
Subject: Darwin, Little Grebe still present...
From: "Peter Kyne" <Peter.Kyne AT cdu.edu.au>
Date: Thu, 5 Nov 2009 09:08:28 +0930
Hi Birding Aussers,
 
Thought I'd send an update from Darwin. The Little Grebe is still at Leanyer 
Sewage Ponds (we saw it again this morning), being faithful to the same pond. 

 
In other Darwin news:
 
While there has been up to 4 Little Ringed Plovers seen at Leanyer since late 
August, we couldn't locate any this morning. Which doesn't mean they aren't 
there. They are easily overlooked. We saw 1 on Tuesday. 

 
Eastern Yellow Wagtails have generally been scarce at Leanyer (only a handful 
of reported sightings). There have been good numbers at Knuckey's Lagoons 
(Fiddlers Lane) though. Micha and I counted 15 there last weekend. 6 Australian 
Pratincoles remain at that site. 

 
Barn Swallows have been scarce. We have seen a single bird at Leanyer with Tree 
Martins on two consecutive days, but we have not seen one since October 12. 

 
The Botanic Gardens Rufous Owls are being very co-operative in the rainforest 
section of the gardens, now often perched side by side. 

 
Chestnut Rail is being seen consistently on the boat ramp side of Buffalo Creek 
(even in the carpark!). 

 
White-browed Crake is fairly easy to find at Fogg Dam. That location is always 
a joy to visit. 

 
Oriental Plovers are still making their regular mid morning visits to 
Nightcliff Rocks. 12 were seen yesterday. 

 
Little Curlews are around. Leanyer, the Fogg Dam area and Knuckey's Lagoon 
(Snipe Swamp) are all good locations. 

 
There has only been one report of a Snipe (presumed Swinhoe's) this season, and 
that was from McMinn's Lagoon. We await the arrival of the Oriental Pratincoles 
and hopefully some nice vagrants. 

 
There has been some mention on Birding Aus of access to Leanyer. While Power 
and Water are not giving out any more keys at the moment, current permit 
holders are still able to access the ponds. We are happy to take any birders. 

 
Cheers, Pete Kyne and Micha Jackson, Darwin, NT
==============================www.birding-aus.org
birding-aus.blogspot.com

To unsubscribe from this mailing list,
send the message:
unsubscribe
(in the body of the message, with no Subject line)
to: birding-aus-request AT vicnet.net.au
==============================
Subject: Re: Pay for Rare Bird Alert...surely not?
From: David Stowe <davidstowe AT optusnet.com.au>
Date: Thu, 5 Nov 2009 10:28:47 +1100
Apologies if this has been brought up before (I don't remember seeing  
it but there has been ALOT of information in this topic and my head is  
swimming!) - but what is wrong with a simple SMS system?
Everyone pretty much has a mobile phone and you will get better  
coverage with a phone than having to be able to access internet etc.  
Wouldn't this be the same as a pager (or better)?
I recently switched to Telstra so that i had reception in more areas -  
my upcoming trip to Round Hill being a big consideration being away  
from my family/young baby etc (yes i have a wonderdul wife!).
Sorry again if this has been mentioned and found to be a stupid idea :)

Cheers
David Stowe


On 05/11/2009, at 9:06 AM, Simon Mustoe wrote:


Hi,

Time for me to chip in five cents!

I agree wholeheartedly with all the comments regarding social  
networking tools. Fantastic opportunities for birding.

Let's
not forget though, that long before Twitter and various websites
existed, we all had mobile phones and in times past could even access
the 'world network' using a comprehensive system of pay phones around
the country.

So why then, do we still pine for a Rare Bird Alert System?

The
reason is that it's not just about what tool you use but how you go
about it. There is one important part of the equation that has not yet
been discussed in this forum. I used to know Dick Filby who runs Rare
Bird Alert in the UK. Several of my close friends operated the system.
I was one of the FIRST birders in the UK to have one - Dick gave us
stoodents a freebie, so we could run around shamelessly boasting about
it ... as it went off with an audible alarm, it soon had birders
interested. But its success had nothing to do with the fact it was a
pager.

Rare Bird Alert works because it is manned every day and
in recent years, almost 24/7. It takes the hassle out of communication
because a simple phone call to a recorded message bank and within
minutes, your record is being received by the masses. The middle man
does the networking, so you don't have to. You don't even have to think
about logging on, it simply arrives on your phone wherever you happen
to be, at any time. It's success is due to hard work and, most
importantly, it is funded - so the system is quality controlled. This
is really important.

Yes, social networking tools are great
but they don't satisfy this need now and they won't in the future
either - well not until we have a Wide Area Network over the entire
country (maybe satellite iPhones in future). No medium will actually do
the job unless someone 'drives' the process. I or anyone else could
easily use Twitter to communicate rare birds but I have to also feed my
family, so I am not about to spend hours EVERY day managing and
moderating the process. Maybe we leave it to the masses but as Chris
Sanderson says, you then lose quality control. This was one of the most
important considerations in UK Rare Bird Alert. I can't tell you how
frustrated people got about cock ups. Quality is everything. Then,
there is no guarantee people would even receive the news. IPhone or
not, you don't log on all day every day and you certainly don't can't
use an iPhone in much of the outback - though you can get mobile
reception, though GPRS is going to be costing you the equivalent of
satellite bandwidth (~$10 / MB).

So the way I see it, if
Australians want Rare Bird Alert, then there is really no alternative
to a subscription system with some form of 'alert'. Now that doesn't
preclude the use of social-networking or the web. In fact, it may be
very complimentary.

Chris and I have begun a process to look
into this. If anyone who has not already responded, would like to
provide their thoughts then drop me a line and I will send you a
questionnaire.

Regards,

Simon Mustoe.
		 	   		   		 	   		
_________________________________________________________________
Download Messenger onto your mobile for free
http://clk.atdmt.com/UKM/go/174426567/direct/01/www.birding-aus.org
birding-aus.blogspot.com

To unsubscribe from this mailing list,
send the message:
unsubscribe
(in the body of the message, with no Subject line)
to: birding-aus-request AT vicnet.net.au


===============================
www.birding-aus.org
birding-aus.blogspot.com

To unsubscribe from this mailing list, 
send the message:
unsubscribe 
(in the body of the message, with no Subject line)
to: birding-aus-request AT vicnet.net.au
===============================
Subject: Rare Bird Alert Operator
From: Carl Clifford <carlsclifford AT gmail.com>
Date: Thu, 5 Nov 2009 10:27:15 +1100
There seem to be quite a few out there who are in favour of a rare  
bird alert system. Unfortunately no one has put up their hand to  
operate the system.
I presume that the organisation and operation is to be left up to the  
marvellous multi-skilled they.

Cheers,

Carl Clifford
===============================
www.birding-aus.org
birding-aus.blogspot.com

To unsubscribe from this mailing list, 
send the message:
unsubscribe 
(in the body of the message, with no Subject line)
to: birding-aus-request AT vicnet.net.au
===============================